Thursday, August 13, 2026

Missing human rights lawyer still terrifies the CCP vs Zhu Rongji's death

 Direct translations

China's "Democratically Elected President"? He terrifies the CCP
— Gao Zhisheng "disappeared" for nine years; supporters urge not to forget

Epoch Times Reporters : Tang Bing and Hong Ning / Editor: Fang Xun / Source: The Epoch Times / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0814/2420727.html
Renowned Chinese human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng has been "missing" for nine years, his fate unknown. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities have consistently refused to provide any information, even denying the fact of his detention. Many observers both in China and overseas have expressed their respect for Gao Zhisheng and their anger towards the CCP, urging that he not be forgotten. They believe the CCP's secret imprisonment of Gao Zhisheng stems primarily from fear of a deep-seated crisis within the regime.

Mainland Lawyer: He has a divine blessing; The CCP is very afraid of him

Born on 20 April 1964, Gao Zhisheng is from Jia County, Yulin City, Shaanxi Province. He has practiced law since 1996, long advocating for the rights of vulnerable groups. He has defended cases considered sensitive by the authorities, including Falun Gong practitioners, underground Christians, and impoverished farmers and private entrepreneurs who have disputes with officials. He is widely respected and hailed as "China's conscience," "a pioneer of China's human rights movement," and "a leading figure in China's human rights lawyer community."

Yang Dong (pseudonym), a human rights lawyer involved in the 709 crackdown, told The Epoch Times that Gao Zhisheng had a significant influence on him.

“When I first started out, I watched a documentary called ‘Beyond Fear: The Story of Gao Zhisheng,’ which taught me about his situation. I also read his book, ‘2017, Rise Up, China.’ This information was circulating, and the CCP was very afraid of him.”

Yang Dong believes that Gao Zhisheng was blessed by divine intervention. “He was persecuted many times, yet he didn’t die, and he never yielded. The CCP’s secret agents and state security officers jokingly said that he was the democratically elected president, the people’s president. So, the CCP is actually very afraid of him.”

Yang Dong said that the environment in China is getting worse, and the CCP is increasingly feeling a crisis of regime, fearing those who have great influence among the people. The CCP has controlled Gao Zhisheng for so many years, making him seem like he has disappeared from the face of the earth, without any news, “but I believe he is definitely still alive.”

高智晟律师当年与访民在一起的留影。(韩亦言提供)
Image : Photo of Gao Zhisheng with petitioners. Provided by Han Yiyan

Former Imprisoned Lawyer: Gao Zhisheng's torture was ten thousand times more severe than mine

Since the end of 2004, Gao Zhisheng repeatedly petitioned high-ranking officials of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), arguing that the suppression of Falun Gong and other groups lacked legal basis and demanding that the authorities change their methods. He also participated in the investigation into allegations of organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners. He was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize three times. In November 2005, Gao Zhisheng and his wife publicly announced their withdrawal from the CCP.

Gao Zhisheng was repeatedly harassed and tortured by the CCP using mafia-like methods. In August 2006, his license was revoked and he was secretly abducted, during which time he was subjected to four months of torture. On 22 December 2006, a Beijing court sentenced Gao Zhisheng to three years in prison with a five-year suspended sentence for "inciting subversion of state power." However, during his probation period, he was repeatedly secretly abducted and tortured.

In 2007, Gao Zhisheng published an open letter to the U.S. Congress describing the human rights situation in China and calling for a U.S. boycott of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Shortly after, he was tortured for two consecutive months. In February 2009, he lost contact with the outside world. Under international pressure, he briefly appeared in Beijing in April 2010 for an interview with the Associated Press, before disappearing again for 20 months.

Gao Zhisheng was released on 7 August 2014, after serving three years of a wrongful imprisonment, but his physical and mental condition was extremely poor. He was placed under house arrest by the authorities after his release.

In 2016, Gao Zhisheng published his book, *2017, Rise Up, China*, documenting the CCP's kidnapping, imprisonment, and torture of him, and testifying to divine revelation, predicting the CCP's downfall, and offering his views on building a democratic and modern China.

In January 2017, he publicly released a draft of the *Constitution of the Federal Republic of China*. This draft outlines his propositions and visions for constitutional democracy, federalism, and national transformation in China's future. The draft was published on the Epoch Times website. (Link)

On 13 August 2017, Gao Zhisheng, while under illegal house arrest in his hometown in Shaanxi Province, suddenly lost all contact with the outside world and his whereabouts became unknown.

Zeng Yuan (pseudonym), a mainland human rights lawyer who was sentenced by the CCP for "inciting subversion of state power," told the Epoch Times that Gao's charges and sentence were similar to his.

"In terms of publicly available sentences, I have one more charge than Gao, and two or three more years of imprisonment, but the persecution and torture Gao Zhisheng suffered is a thousand times, ten thousand times more severe than mine! The harm Gao suffered is unimaginable and unacceptable!"

Zeng Yuan believes that Gao's draft constitution on the future democratic constitutionalism of the new China, his interviews with foreign media after his release from prison, and the human rights awards he received from the international community have angered the authoritarian and dictatorial CCP's top rulers.

"Attorney Gao has played a positive role in promoting democracy and constitutionalism in China, and has served as a model for the awakening of the Chinese people. Attorney Gao has long been subjected to the evil and barbaric suppression of the CCP, which even made him disappear for nine years, neither alive nor dead, without a trace. This is truly the height of evil and terror, sending chills down one's spine!" he said.

Zeng Yuan believes that for the past nine years, the authorities have certainly tried every means to force Attorney Gao to confess and abandon his ideals of democracy and constitutionalism. Gao Zhisheng certainly refused to comply with their demands, which is why he has not been released to this day.

Zeng Yuan wants to say to Attorney Gao: "You are supported by me and all my fellow advocates who love democracy and freedom! You are not alone! Let's cheer each other on! Let's work together! Let's change China! In the near future, the democratic Greater China we hope for will surely be realized! Better to die upright than live on your knees! You are doing great! Persistence will lead to victory! Long live freedom! Democracy will prevail!"

Dong Quan (pseudonym), a lawyer from the 709 crackdown in mainland China, stated that Attorney Gao Zhisheng's nine-year disappearance is sufficient proof that evil has no bottom line. The CCP's actions fully constitute illegal detention and other related crimes. However, the evil of the CCP's public security, procuratorate, and judicial system is intertwined; there should be no illusions about it.

《神与我们并肩作战》书封(博大出版社提供)
Image : Book cover of "God Fights With Us" provided by Boda Press


Insider: Gao Zhisheng's case is a taboo in China

Fang Zheng, a leader of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, told The Epoch Times that Gao Zhisheng had already been detained and tortured multiple times by the CCP government before his recent disappearance, and this time he likely suffered even more severe treatment.

Fang Zheng said that everyone calls Gao Zhisheng the backbone of the nation and the conscience of China. "Such an image of unyielding integrity is naturally feared by the CCP government because he can inspire many people. The CCP is now afraid of the awakening of the people, afraid of Gao Zhisheng's tenacious and indomitable spirit of resistance, because the CCP knows its sins are too numerous."

Gao Zhisheng's wife, Geng He, and their two children are currently in exile in the United States. Since leaving mainland China with her children in 2009 and obtaining asylum in the United States, Geng He has consistently spoken out publicly for Gao Zhisheng, whose fate remains unknown, and has been searching for her husband's whereabouts.

Fang Zheng stated that Gao Zhisheng's immediate family has also received no information. The Gao Zhisheng case is a taboo subject in China. When his family inquires with the government, no one pays attention. Even when they hire lawyers to inquire about Gao Zhisheng's situation, no lawyer is available; there is absolutely no room for maneuver. The CCP has gone to great lengths to completely block the news.

"This is a very strange and very important phenomenon, enough to attract the attention of the international community. We must speak out for Gao Zhisheng; otherwise, how can justice be served?" he emphasized.

He stated that Gao Zhisheng is now the family member of a U.S. citizen, and the U.S. government has the right and the ability to inquire. "We urge the US government to put pressure on the CCP government and Xi Jinping."

The outcry of supporters: Jie Lijian, chairman of the International Alliance of the China Democracy Party, lamented: "The sky in America is blue and free, while the sky in China is dark, terrifying, and suffocating."

He told The Epoch Times that lawyer Gao Zhisheng is hailed as the backbone of China. For nine years, his wife and family have endured immense suffering, searching for hope in despair and darkness. Where is lawyer Gao Zhisheng? We, people around the world who care about democracy and human rights, demand answers from the CCP's tyranny:

"Immediately release lawyer Gao Zhisheng so he can reunite with his family. Justice will not be absent; evil criminals will be brought to justice."

"Lawyer Gao Zhisheng, have you heard our cries? Has the Communist Party's tyranny heard the world's condemnation and roar of justice? Human rights abusers will be brought to justice."

"Salute to lawyer Gao Zhisheng, salute to all the backbone of Chinese human rights who speak out for justice in the darkness," said Jie Lijian.

A lawyer residing in the US praises Gao Zhisheng and calls for not forgetting. Former Chinese human rights lawyer Wu Shaoping told The Epoch Times that Gao Zhisheng represented many cases involving religious beliefs, such as those concerning Falun Gong. These types of cases are highly sensitive within the CCP regime.

"He is the bravest one. In terms of defending human rights, I think he is the most epoch-making." "Wu Shaoping said that Gao Zhisheng, born into poverty, rose to become a renowned lawyer through personal effort, a truly legendary story. He possesses unwavering resilience, choosing to continue the struggle despite long-term persecution by the CCP, and even writing a lengthy statement in 2017 asserting that the collapse of the CCP regime was imminent.

"Under such circumstances, his ability to continue speaking out and telling the world is itself extremely difficult, demonstrating his unwavering integrity," Wu Shaoping said.

"The nine years since Gao's enforced disappearance have shown the world what kind of regime the CCP is. The CCP has not only violated its own laws but also international regulations. Therefore, it is crucial for the international community to continue paying attention to Gao Zhisheng's safety.

'Letting everyone know that the world has not forgotten Gao Zhisheng, and that everyone is still working hard to find and rescue him. I think this is very important.'" "He said.

2026年4月4日,二百多位嘉宾云集南加州自由雕塑公园,出席中国人权律师高智晟塑像揭幕仪式。高智晟的妻子耿和发言。(陈德怡/大纪元)
Image : On 4 April 2026, more than 200 guests gathered at the Liberty Sculpture Park in Southern California to attend the unveiling ceremony of the statue of Chinese human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng. Gao Zhisheng's wife, Geng He, spoke. (Chen Deyi/The Epoch Times)

Geng He: Justice will never be absent

On 8 August 2026, at the Gao Zhisheng Sculpture Park..." On the ninth anniversary of Gao Zhisheng's disappearance, his wife, Geng He, along with others concerned about human rights in China, visited Liberty Sculpture Park in California to hold a memorial event in front of Gao Zhisheng's sculpture, "Looking Up at the Stars—Gao Zhisheng."

According to a report by *Beijing Spring*, the crowd gathered at the base of the sculpture and sang "The Watcher in the Abyss," a song written for Gao Zhisheng. The song echoed across the vast deserts of Southern California, commemorating Gao Zhisheng's years of efforts for the vulnerable, human rights, and the rule of law. This was another appeal for international attention to his whereabouts.

Among the crowd, Gao Zhisheng's wife, Geng He, stood before her husband's sculpture, singing along with the others.

The report stated that for other participants, it was a memorial event; but for Geng He, the sculpture before her represented her husband, whom she had been unable to see freely for nine years. The statue was so close, yet the real-life loved one was separated by numerous obstacles, adding a somber tone to the day's commemoration.

On 10 August 2026, Geng He posted on social media thanking U.S.-based human rights activist Chen Guangcheng for participating in the "Nine Years of Vigil" event in support of Gao Zhisheng. She addressed Gao, saying:

The years of forced disappearance

cannot be a reason for silence

No news

cannot be a reason to stop asking

We demand the CCP reveal your true whereabouts

We demand the CCP stop its illegal detention and persecution of you

We call upon you

We call upon you, the conscience of China's lawyer

to return home safely and freely

We know that sometimes justice is delayed

But I firmly believe that justice will never be absent

Zhu Rongji has passed away! The official obituary has a subtle tone; has the wind of the times shifted?

Reporter : Wang He / Source : NTDTV / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0813/2420348.htmlImage : Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji. (Feng Li/Getty Images) 

Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji passed away in Beijing on 12 August 2026. The official obituary gave him high praise, but overseas observers pointed out that the obituary deliberately concealed details of Zhu Rongji's early life, reflecting the authorities' intention to "forcefully glorify" him by using the death of a political elder, and also marking the accelerated end of the CCP's "reform and opening-up era."

In the official obituary, Zhu Rongji was described as a leader who "dared to speak the truth and was not afraid to offend people," and it emphasized that he had "firmly supported" the current leadership.

However, senior current affairs commentator Chen Pokong pointed out in an interview that the official obituary contained several obvious instances of "historical embellishment" and irony.

First, the obituary made no mention of Zhu Rongji being labeled a "rightist" in 1958 or the setbacks during the Cultural Revolution, reflecting the authorities' cover-up of sensitive historical memories.

Secondly, while the official praise for his "courage to speak the truth" is significant, speaking the truth carries immense risk in the current political climate, which is itself a regression.

Regarding the obituary's claim of "firm support," commentators have pointed out that Zhu Rongji actually had significant disagreements with the current leadership's ultra-leftist line in his later years. As early as the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Zhu Rongji was filmed as one of the very few elders present who did not applaud; previously, the *Wall Street Journal* also reported that Zhu Rongji explicitly opposed breaking the term limits for leaders. Chen Pokong believes that the obituary's call for the public to "unite around Xi Jinping's central leadership" is essentially the authorities forcibly "borrowing the glory" of a political elder after his death.

Furthermore, the financial and economic system led by Zhu Rongji has also suffered continuous political purges in recent years. Whether it's his protégé Wang Qishan's former subordinates or many reformist financial officials, they have frequently faced investigations and marginalization.

Although Zhu Rongji promoted the tax-sharing system, China's accession to the WTO, and state-owned enterprise (SOE) reform during his tenure—despite the ongoing controversy surrounding the massive layoffs resulting from SOE reform—it is widely believed that with the passing of Zhu Rongji and other veteran reformers, and the current comprehensive policy shift, the "era of reform and opening up" has effectively come to an end.

From the carefully worded official obituary to the differing opinions on his historical legacy, Zhu Rongji's death is not merely the end of a political symbol, but also reflects the complex political landscape and shifting tide in China today.


Zhu Rongji's merits and demerits are highly controversial! The inside story of his successful "rebellion in Heaven"
Reporter : Wang Duruo / Editor : Zhongkang / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0813/2420397.html

Is Zhu Rongji's merit and demerit complex? Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji passed away on 12 August 2026, at the age of 98. During his tenure, China entered the WTO and gained enormous economic and trade benefits, but the impact of this history on global trade is viewed with polarization.

The Controversies of the WTO

On 15 November 1999, the final day of the US-China WTO negotiations, then-Premier Zhu Rongji personally attended the negotiations. According to the memoirs of Long Yongtu, the Chinese negotiator at the time, only seven issues remained unresolved. Zhu Rongji, with a stern face, told everyone: "We must sign an agreement today. We can't let the Americans get away. I will talk to them." After Zhu Rongji made "significant concessions," the two sides signed an agreement. He later admitted that he had received authorization from then-CCP leader Jiang Zemin.

Why did Jiang Zemin instruct Zhu Rongji to make significant concessions to the United States at the last minute? According to scholar He Qinglian's 2018 social media post, Zhu Rongji delivered a "famous speech" within the State Council system, responding to external concerns about the impact on agriculture and media openness: "We agreed to (the US conditions) now in order to join the WTO. After joining, whether or not we abide by them is in our hands. Every rule has loopholes that can be exploited; everyone should study them carefully." Those listening immediately understood the implication, and after the five-year observation period, the CCP entered a phase of not adhering to the agreements.

Netizens revealed that then-Premier Li Peng's description of the same issue was more direct and vivid. He once described it as: "Joining the WTO is like Sun Wukong entering Princess Iron Fan's belly. Once inside, you can wreak havoc in Heaven; if you don't, you'll never succeed… Get in first, then we'll talk." It's worth noting that neither Zhu Rongji's "loophole theory" nor Li Peng's "Sun Wukong theory" are mere speculation; they are widely circulated within the CCP's top leadership and are statements the CCP itself doesn't shy away from. Such statements have extremely wide reach within the system, which is why they are repeatedly leaked by insiders, indicating that this "agree first, then exploit loopholes" strategy was a tacit consensus within the CCP's top leadership from the very beginning.

After joining the WTO, the CCP illegally erected various trade barriers and high tariffs to counter the entry of American products—competitive American products either couldn't enter China at all or were subject to high tariffs, while corresponding Chinese products flowed freely in the US. The CCP imposes high tariffs and censorship on highly competitive American products such as film, pharmaceuticals, automobiles, banking, securities, and insurance, while completely blocking the most competitive American internet companies and media outlets, including Google, Facebook, X, and Instagram. This unfair trade practice has continued from the Jiang Zemin era to the present day, inherited by successive governments, until the Xi Jinping era.

More than a decade later, Americans finally realized that the CCP had no intention of fulfilling its WTO commitments. Instead, it used the advantages of WTO accession to systematically force technology transfer, steal American technology, and cripple American manufacturing through trade barriers, government subsidies, and dumping cheap products. This led to President Trump launching a trade war against the CCP in 2018, demanding that Beijing undertake structural reforms and become a true market economy. On December 11, 2021, the 20th anniversary of China's accession to the WTO, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tweeted: "20 years ago, by granting China WTO membership, the world gave the CCP a blank check, and the CCP broke its market promises, deceived American workers, and exploited its own workers."

In fact, joining the WTO was a successful operation of the CCP's unrestricted economic warfare, equivalent to planting a "red Trojan horse" in the Western free market economic system, whose sole instruction was to destroy this free market system. The more than two decades of CCP participation in the WTO have been more than two decades of this red Trojan horse's comprehensive invasion and plunder of Western market economic resources, and the United States is the biggest victim of this "Trojan horse massacre."

The hollowing out of American manufacturing: The CCP's century-long unrestricted economic warfare

In the wave of globalization, a large number of strategic American manufacturing industries, such as steel, aluminum, rare metals, electronics manufacturing, solar photovoltaics, battery storage, and pharmaceuticals and medical equipment, have shifted to China, severely damaging US national security. Century Aluminum CEO Bryce revealed that the number of aluminum smelters in the United States has shrunk from 23 in 2000 to only 5 today, with only 2 operating at full capacity. Meanwhile, China accounts for 56% of global aluminum smelting capacity. Retired Brigadier General Adams pointed out that aluminum is widely used in F/A-18 and F-35 fighter jets and Coast Guard vessels, yet the US supply chain relies on China and Russia, directly threatening national defense security.

According to data from the Economic Policy Institute, between 2001 and 2018, the U.S. closed nearly 90,000 manufacturing plants and lost 3.7 million jobs due to business relocation, primarily to China. A McKinsey 2024 report shows that U.S. shipbuilding output has declined by more than 85% since the 1950s, with its share of global ocean-going merchant ship construction remaining at only 0.1% to 0.2%. In contrast, in 2024, a single state-owned shipbuilding enterprise in China will build more merchant ships in a single year than the U.S. has built in the 80 years since the end of World War II. Former Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer lamented that while the U.S. invented the personal computer and semiconductors, its own semiconductor production now accounts for only 8% of the global total. Secretary of State Marco Rubio bluntly stated that the CCP is not interested in making money; its real goal is to monopolize the market and control pricing power.

Aboluowang commentator Wang Duran pointed out that the CCP's economic system is essentially a "wartime system"—land, raw materials, supply chains, wages, and exchange rates are all controlled by the CCP, allowing for "unrestricted" dumping of environmental, human, and financial resources. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, environmental pollution costs China 3% to 10% of its GDP annually, almost offsetting GDP growth; approximately 9 million people die globally each year from pollution-related diseases, with China accounting for 2.4 million, ranking first globally. Regarding subsidies, CSIS research shows that in 2019, the CCP subsidized favored industries with amounts ranging from $248 billion to $407 billion; an IMF report indicates that between 2009 and 2022, subsidies accounted for 95% of China's trade-distorting policies, with batteries, photovoltaics, and electric vehicles receiving the most subsidies.

"Debt Trap": Global asset harvesting under the Belt and Road Initiative

The CCP simultaneously uses a "debt trap" to control strategic assets in developing countries. The Hambantota Port in Sri Lanka is a prime example—after a decade of bribing officials and providing high-interest loans, the CCP successfully acquired a 70% stake and a 99-year lease for the port. According to a report by AidData from the College of William & Mary, from 2000 to 2017, the CCP funded projects in 165 countries totaling over $843 billion; from 2013 to 2022, during the Belt and Road Initiative, global accounts receivable reached approximately $1.1 trillion, with 80% flowing to financially distressed countries, and 42 countries having public debt to China exceeding 10% of their GDP.

"War Is Not Far From Us: The Midwife of the Chinese Century"

The critical period of China's WTO accession negotiations in 1999 coincided with the publication of the book "Unrestricted Warfare," which systematized the CCP's strategic thinking. A widely circulated online 2003 internal speech by former Defense Minister Chi Haotian, titled "War Is Not Far From Us, It Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century," further reveals the strategic core of the CCP system: focusing on economic construction is merely a pretext; focusing on war is the consistent aim; the fate of the Party is above all humanity; the CCP and the United States are irreconcilable adversaries, and solving the "American problem" is a task history has entrusted to the CCP. This speech has been widely circulated online, and based on its content, language style, and values, its credibility is very high, thus becoming an important document for the outside world to understand the CCP's true intentions.

Attachment: War Is Not Far From Us, It Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century https://www.aboluowang.com/2009/0225/120319.html

Wang Duran: Why is Zhu Rongji's position so controversial?

Wang Duran points out that the polarized evaluations of Zhu Rongji largely depend on the commentators' own stances. If one stands on the side of supporting the CCP, believing that the market economy and property rights reform are used to prolong the CCP regime's life, thereby infiltrating the West and seeking world hegemony, then Zhu Rongji would naturally be highly praised. However, from the perspective of ordinary people, this high praise is untenable.

Wang Duran analyzes that the CCP's first half of rule involved confiscating the private property of ordinary people and implementing public-private partnerships under the guise of "revolution." Zhu Rongji's leadership in state-owned enterprise reform—the industrialization of healthcare, education, and housing—was essentially "dividing up state assets under the guise of reform." After the reforms, a large amount of the original state assets flowed into the private pockets of government officials, countless state-owned enterprise workers lost their jobs, families were ruined, and some even committed suicide out of despair. After industrialization, ordinary people could not afford medical care, education, or old-age support; the "four mountains" weighing on the heads of ordinary Chinese people—education, healthcare, housing, and old-age care—stemmed from this. From this perspective, Zhu Rongji was actually an executor of Jiang Zemin's "crony capitalism" policy, rather than a true reform "leader," making his designation as a "reformer" inherently controversial.

Zhu Rongji's shifting stance on the Falun Gong Issue

During the "April 25th Incident" in 1999, Zhu Rongji personally issued instructions demanding an end to the harassment of Falun Gong practitioners and agreeing to release more than 40 Falun Gong practitioners arrested in Tianjin at the time. When the Politburo Standing Committee discussed the Falun Gong issue, all but Jiang Zemin of the seven members explicitly expressed their opposition to the suppression. Zhu Rongji even publicly defended Falun Gong: "Most Falun Gong practitioners are middle-aged and elderly, mostly women. Their greatest wish is simply to stay healthy… I think it's untenable to say these people have political motives… If there are bad elements within Falun Gong, we must deal with them. As for ordinary practitioners, let them practice!" These words enraged Jiang Zemin, who pointed at Zhu Rongji and shouted, "Foolish! Foolish! Foolish! This will lead to the downfall of the Party and the country!" Subsequently, Jiang Zemin and the CCP regime rapidly hardened their policy towards Falun Gong, and in July of the same year, they announced its ban.

However, as the suppression unfolded, Zhu Rongji's stance gradually softened—after the suppression order was issued, Zhu Rongji, as Premier of the State Council, did not appear on television for more than half a month. In the following three or four years, Zhu Rongji's stance gradually aligned with Jiang Zemin's, ultimately "unconditionally following the shift, turning a blind eye to the countless persecutions suffered by Falun Gong practitioners." Later, when facing related inquiries overseas, he even publicly defended the persecution, stating that "Falun Gong is a harmful cult, and the Chinese government has taken legal measures to protect the interests of the people"—a stark contrast to his earlier public stance at the Politburo Standing Committee meetings.

Zhu Rongji personally planted an unexploded bomb! Is it finally about to explode?

Reporter : Wang Duruo / Editor : Zhongkang / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0813/2420419.html / Image : Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji passed away. (Reuters)
中国前国务院总理朱镕基病逝。(路透)

Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji has passed away. Shen Rongqin, an associate professor at York University in Canada, points out that while Zhu Rongji is often seen as a driving force behind China's capitalism and market economy, this is inaccurate. Although Zhu Rongji promoted some market reforms, he was essentially implementing Deng Xiaoping's line, establishing a state-led market economy.

In a Facebook post, Shen Rongqin stated that while the media focuses on Zhu Rongji's policies during his premiership, the tax-sharing system he implemented as vice premier was one of the most far-reaching policies in China's history, laying the groundwork for future land-based finance, the real estate bubble, and the local debt crisis.

In 1991, Zhu Rongji moved from Shanghai to Beijing to become vice premier. While nominally nominated by Premier Li Peng, he was actually promoted by Deng Xiaoping. At the time, Executive Vice Premier Yao Yilin, who also served as a member of the Politburo Standing Committee, was the true official in charge of the economy, finance, and banking. However, both he and Li Peng were traditional bureaucrats, and their policies differed from Deng Xiaoping's. Yao Yilin, due to his advanced age and health reasons, gradually handed over economic management power to Zhu Rongji.

At the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 1992, Zhu Rongji made a rare "three-level leap," skipping the Central Committee and Politburo memberships to directly enter the Politburo Standing Committee, becoming one of the main implementers of Deng Xiaoping's reform policies.

During his tenure, Zhu Rongji launched an anti-corruption campaign, but his son, Zhu Yunlai, later became president and CEO of China International Capital Corporation (CICC), leading the listing and restructuring of large state-owned enterprises and accumulating enormous wealth. While Zhu Rongji's SOE reforms improved the efficiency of some SOEs, they also shattered the "iron rice bowls" of many workers, especially in Northeast China where he had worked in his early years, sparking long-term discontent.

He spearheaded China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), making China the "world's factory," but the CCP's failure to abide by the rules also had serious consequences for the world. Furthermore, the tax-sharing system implemented by Zhu Rongji in 1994 profoundly changed the power relationship between Zhongnanhai and local governments.

In the 1980s, the CCP began implementing a "fiscal contract responsibility system," first piloted in Guangdong and Fujian, and then extended nationwide in 1985. Local governments only needed to remit a pre-agreed amount of revenue to the central government, with the remainder at their discretion, thus creating a structure of "strong local governments and weak central governments."

To avoid increasing the central government's remittance quotas, local governments began reducing taxes for local businesses and, through pretexts such as "business sponsorships" and "fundraising for maintenance," directly used funds for urban construction and employee welfare. Local governments also significantly increased "extra-budgetary revenue," creating various administrative fees, fundraising schemes, and apportionments; at one point, the central government even borrowed money from local governments to pay salaries.

In 1994, Zhu Rongji promoted a tax-sharing system, aiming to re-strengthen the central government's financial power. After the reform, customs duties and consumption taxes went to the central government; land use taxes and property taxes went to local governments; and value-added tax was shared between the central and local governments, initially with the central government receiving 75% and local governments only 25%.

When the "fiscal contract responsibility system" was implemented, the central government's revenue accounted for a minimum of only 22% of the national fiscal revenue; after the implementation of the tax-sharing system, this figure rapidly rose to 56%. The ratio of national fiscal revenue to GDP also increased from 12.3% in 1993 to 22.6% in 2012. Shen Rongqin believes this provided Xi Jinping with the financial capital for future foreign expansion.

However, while Zhu Rongji centralized local fiscal power, he left a large amount of expenditure responsibility for education, healthcare, and social security to local governments, resulting in long-term immense financial pressure on local governments. Impoverished areas could only rely on central government transfer payments, further increasing their subservience to the central government and exacerbating regional development inequality.

Because the central government agreed to leave land transfer revenue to local governments, cash-strapped local governments began frantically selling land, driving up land and housing prices and creating a "land finance" system that lasted for over two decades.

Meanwhile, the Budget Law initially prohibited local governments from directly issuing bonds. Local governments then established local financing platforms, also known as urban investment companies, injecting land and other assets into these companies. These companies then borrowed from banks or issued urban investment bonds to fund road construction and new district development.

These debts, ostensibly belonging to the enterprises, were in reality borne by the local governments, thus accumulating a massive amount of hidden debt. When the real estate bubble burst and land sales revenue plummeted, this fiscal model, reliant on land and debt, became a "time bomb" for the continued existence of local government finances in China.

Shen Rongqin bluntly stated that Zhu Rongji did indeed promote some aspects of market economy, but his core goal was not to establish capitalism in the Western sense, but rather to strengthen central fiscal power and promote nationalism and a state-led market economy. The tax-sharing system rapidly strengthened Zhongnanhai, but it also led local governments down a path of no return: land sales, debt, and reliance on real estate.

People mourning Zhu Rongji reportedly subjected to control and censorship; Beijing on high alert to prevent situation from escalating


Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji recently passed away in Beijing. On 13 August 2026, people spontaneously went to his ancestral home in Changsha, Hunan Province, to lay flowers in mourning but the scene was controlled. Other netizens who posted condolences online were also censored. Reports indicate that the CCP is currently worried that people will use the mourning for Zhu Rongji as an opportunity to express dissatisfaction with the current situation, and Beijing is on high alert.

Former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji passed away in Beijing at 11.06 am on 12 August 2026 at the age of 98. Zhu Rongji's ancestral home, "Tianyuan," is located in Tangpo, Heping Village, Ansha Town, Changsha.

Images circulating online show more than ten bouquets of flowers placed in front of Tianyuan, with several uniformed security personnel stationed outside.

Hong Kong's Ming Pao reported on 14 August 2026 that on that afternoon, the entrance to Zhu Rongji's ancestral home was cordoned off with retractable barriers. Those offering flowers had to hand their bouquets to staff, who would then place them in front of the ancestral home. Memorial posts featuring white chrysanthemums and candles also appeared on mainland social media, but netizens reported that the content was censored, and posts containing full names or elegiac couplets could not be sent normally.

Zhu Rongji served as Vice Premier and Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China from 1991 to 2003, and before retiring, he was a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee. Zhu Rongji's death has sparked comparisons between his economic policies then and today's policies, causing considerable tension within the Xi Jinping administration.

Amidst the current economic downturn in China and the multiple pressures facing the real estate market, local debt, and waning confidence among private enterprises, Zhu Rongji's passing is likely to spark comparisons between the economic policies of the Zhu Rongji era and the Xi Jinping era.

On the day of Zhu Rongji's death, an anonymous source within the CCP system revealed to The Epoch Times that Zhu Rongji's every move in his later years was under CCP surveillance. The current concern among the CCP leadership is that "the public may use the opportunity of mourning Zhu Rongji to express dissatisfaction with reality, and even create a wider social sentiment."

He stated that the CCP has always opposed spontaneous public activities, remaining vigilant regardless of whether such activities align with official goals. Its main concern is that spontaneous actions could spiral out of control and even escalate into an anti-CCP movement.

He said that the CCP is now on high alert. Following Zhu Rongji's death, the authorities will be highly vigilant regarding related public opinion. If any signs of the mourning activities spreading are detected, the situation will likely be quickly reported to the highest power centre.




Airport Pictures : Phuquoc Airport Environs Then and Now

 Photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA












Airport Pictures : Phu Quoc Airport / Phuquoc International Airport

 Photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA


















































Trump has a way to deal with Iran

 Direct translation

Iran is playing dirty tricks?! Trump has a way to deal with it
—Facing Iran's most intractable problem: The adversary is not afraid to pay the price

Editor : Fang Xun / Source: Binwen Tianxia / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0813/2420274.html

Recent reports from some so-called mainstream media outlets have portrayed Iran's escalating negotiating demands and increased concessions from the U.S. as a growing predicament for Trump.

This narrative easily creates the impression that while Iran is not in a hurry, Trump is. It seems to suggest that if Iran continues to drag things out, the US will eventually concede due to oil prices, the cost of war, and domestic political pressure.

But the real question is: which side is time on? If we consider the economic, energy, and regional dynamics beyond the battlefield, the answer may be entirely different from what some media outlets are describing.

Trump's real challenge may not be how to end the war quickly, but rather a more complex issue: if the other side prefers to continue suffering enormous losses rather than relinquish its nuclear capabilities and the strategic system upon which its regime depends, how can the US force it to recalculate the costs?

Trump may not necessarily be more anxious than Iran

To understand the current situation, we must first look at a very real indicator: oil.

If the conflict with Iran renders the Strait of Hormuz ineffective, international oil prices surge uncontrollably, and global supply chains suffer severe disruptions, then the pressure on Washington will certainly increase rapidly, and Trump will have to find a way to end the conflict as soon as possible. However, the most noteworthy phenomenon at present is that the international energy market is seeking a new balance. Even with the continued security risks posed by the Strait of Hormuz, some oil shipments can still be maintained using the shipping lanes closer to Oman; meanwhile, Saudi Arabia possesses east-west oil pipelines that can transport crude oil directly to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea coast, thus bypassing the Strait of Hormuz.

Iraq is also seeking more land-based export routes and pushing to restore its oil shipping capacity towards the Mediterranean.

These alternative routes cannot completely replace the Strait of Hormuz, but they at least illustrate one thing: Iran is not as easily able to control the world through energy transportation as one might imagine.

If the international market gradually adapts to the new transportation landscape, and oil prices do not experience a sustained, uncontrolled surge, then the time pressure will shift, and the United States may not need to rush to end this contest.

On the contrary, it is Iran itself that may not be able to withstand the long-term strain.

Trump used an interesting analogy when discussing the current situation: like playing chess, there's always a way out.

This statement aligns well with his negotiating style: if time is weakening the opponent, the least necessary thing to do is worry about them.

What Trump wants to offer Iran is actually a way out


Understanding this is key to understanding why Trump has never simply defined his goal as destroying Iran.

What the Trump administration truly wants to change is Iran's behavior. If Tehran is willing to make significant concessions on nuclear issues, ballistic missiles, the Strait of Hormuz, and regional proxy issues, Trump clearly prefers to see an Iran that re-enters the international economic system, resumes oil exports, attracts foreign investment, and even gradually becomes wealthy, rather than a vast ruin with nearly 100 million people, mired in poverty and war.

Therefore, the U.S. has never only played with bombs. Frozen Iranian assets, economic sanctions, oil exports, the international financial system, and future large-scale investments from Gulf states and private capital can all become bargaining chips.

The logic is easy to understand: you give up the most dangerous things, and we'll let you do business again; you stop threatening your neighbors, and capital will re-enter; you abandon the path to nuclear weapons, and Iran will have a chance to emerge from long-term sanctions and the shadow of war.

For a government that rationally considers its national interests, this should at least be a choice worth careful consideration.

The problem lies precisely here.

National interests are not necessarily the interests of the regime

When analyzing other countries, Westerners often subconsciously assume that every government ultimately wants its people to be better off. Economic growth is always better than recession, international investment is always better than sanctions, peace is always better than war, and urban prosperity is always better than infrastructure destruction.

From the perspective of ordinary people, this is certainly true. But from the perspective of a highly ideological regime, the answer is not necessarily so, because the nation and the regime are not entirely the same thing.

For ordinary Iranians, a more stable currency, better jobs, freer trade, and no longer being threatened by war are obviously all good things.

However, the ruling group may be considering entirely different issues. Its primary concern is: Can I continue to hold power? If opening up means losing control, if reconciliation with the West means weakening its ideological legitimacy, if giving up nuclear capabilities means losing its last strategic deterrent, then even if the entire country loses hundreds of billions of dollars in profits, the ruling group may still consider it a worthwhile price to pay.

This is where Trump's real predicament lies. He's not necessarily facing an opponent unaware of the magnitude of economic interests; rather, the opponent believes that certain things are more important than the economy.

When "making you rich" no longer holds sufficient allure

Trump's most adept diplomatic language is actually about making deals. His typical thinking has always been: I can make you pay an unbearable price, or I can give you enormous benefits—the choice is yours.

This is why Trump's diplomacy often simultaneously presents two seemingly contradictory elements—maximum pressure on one hand, and constantly leaving the door open for negotiation on the other.

Because both are essentially part of the same strategy. Pressure tells the other side "what will happen if we don't talk," while interests tell the other side "what we will gain if we talk."

However, the trouble lies in the fact that if a regime is willing to allow its economy to stagnate indefinitely, is willing to subject ordinary citizens to sanctions, and even is willing to endure military strikes, as long as its core power structure can continue to exist, then simply increasing the economic benefits of peace may not be enough to change its decision.

The question then shifts: it's no longer, "How much more money do we need to give Iran?" but rather, "What price would truly alter Tehran's strategic calculations?"

These two questions seem similar, but they are fundamentally different. The former is about bargaining; the latter is about deterrence.

The biggest problem with mainstream media narratives: Criticizing Trump is certainly not a problem; the media has a duty to monitor. However, monitoring and preconceived conclusions are not the same thing.

If reports only emphasize Iran's demands and the pressure Trump faces, but rarely discuss the economic costs Iran is paying, the energy market's resilience to conflict, and the shifting regional power balance, then readers are not getting a complete picture.

This easily creates a strange illusion: that as long as Tehran continues to reject the agreement, it holds the upper hand.

But a higher bid at the negotiating table doesn't necessarily mean more cards in hand. Someone running out of chips can still bang on the table, and might even bang it louder.

Therefore, what truly matters is not who shouts the loudest, but who is more capable of enduring time.

If global energy markets continue to function, the US economy doesn't suffer an unbearable shock from the war, while Iran's oil revenues, foreign trade, finances, and military supplies remain under pressure, then the strategic clock may actually be ticking in a different direction.

The issue that truly cannot be delayed is the nuclear issue

If Iran were merely an economically struggling, ideologically rigid regional power, the US could simply wait.

What truly changes the entire calculation is nuclear weapons. Once a regime that has long been hostile to the US and its regional allies acquires a credible nuclear deterrent, the risks of all military options will fundamentally change.

Actions that can be tolerated today may mean entirely different consequences a few years later. Therefore, what history should truly remember is not simply equating today's Iran with Germany in 1933.

That analogy is too crude.

What should truly be remembered is a more general principle: once some threats acquire irreversible capabilities, the cost of dealing with them suddenly increases.

Nuclear weapons are such a capability. Therefore, what Trump truly needs to assess is not how many missiles Iran can launch today, but rather: if the US continues to wait a few more years, will Iran become easier or more difficult to control?

Which side is time on?

This may be the most noteworthy question to observe in the coming months.

Some media outlets hope to portray the story as follows: Iran escalates its demands, Trump is eager to end the war, and therefore the US is ultimately forced to make concessions.

But another possibility exists. The global energy market is adapting, alternative shipping routes are increasing, and the U.S. has not immediately fallen into an unbearable economic crisis due to Iran's continued resistance.

Meanwhile, Iran must continue to face blocked oil exports, trade difficulties, financial pressure, military drain, and diplomatic isolation.

If this trend continues, then what may become increasingly expensive is not Trump's patience, but Iran's refusal.

Trump's most successful negotiators in the past all share a common characteristic: they ultimately knew what they could not afford to lose.

Iran now faces the same choice. On one hand, it can abandon its nuclear weapons program, accept reliable inspections, reduce regional confrontation, and re-enter the global economic system. On the other hand, it can continue to erode its resources.

The choice may be left to Tehran, but what the U.S. truly needs to do is widen the gap in costs between the two options.

Therefore, what Trump needs most right now is perhaps not haste, but patience. Because in a game of chess that has entered the middle stages, the most important thing is never who bangs their fist on the table the loudest, but whose pieces are dwindling.

Trump suddenly seems less anxious! Iran may have miscalculated
—Trump: Either deliver a heavy blow or collapse the Iranian economy

Editor: Zhongkang / Source: Epoch Times / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0812/2419989.html / Image : On 10 August 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images/AFP)
Iran thinks it can drag down Trump? Experts warn: Tehran is the One that can't Afford to waste time

Victor Davis Hansen:

[This war has become so highly politicized in an election year that several fundamental realities have been almost completely ignored by the media.

The seemingly endless cycle of "bombing, pause, negotiation, and more bombing" masks the true effects of the embargo, sanctions, blockade, and financial isolation on Iran. These measures combined are costing the theocratic regime over $400 million a day—a loss it simply cannot afford. Iran thinks it can drag things out until the US midterm elections through endless bargaining; in reality, it is only prolonging its predicament.]

@FloppingAces:

[Iran believes: "As long as the Strait remains semi-blockaded, and we drag out those endless, ridiculous negotiations until the midterm elections, the Americans will soften and withdraw." The mullahs comfort each other, firmly believing that time is on their side.

But the reality is: this regime is losing over $400 million every day.] The riyal, once worth 70 to 1 against the dollar, has now plummeted to 1.9 million to 1 and continues its downward spiral. Only a third of the working-age population actually have jobs; even those who do, their meager official wages are insufficient to buy food. Fuel is rationed like wartime supplies, power outages are frequent in the sweltering heat of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (approximately 49 degrees Celsius), and water resources are dwindling. When salaries began to stop, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Basij militias had already tasted the bitterness of being penniless.

Trump intentionally kept a low profile… watching the entire regime slowly suffocate from hyperinflation, international isolation, and the lack of wages for its henchmen. Meanwhile, the media panicked because there were no daily bombings. The mullahs had hoped time would save their pitiful lives, but it turned out that time was precisely what they couldn't afford to waste.

Barak Lavid:

Just a week ago, Trump almost ordered the resumption of major military operations. In an interview with Axios, however, he made no new military threats and showed no anger at Iran's delay in announcing an agreement with Oman to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump's exact words were: "We're doing it in a low-key manner." "We're only in a semi-negotiating state. We're just looking at Iran's huge inflation and the fact that they have no money."

He emphasized that Iran's economy was in "very bad shape" and that it no longer had the money to pay its military. The US naval blockade further exacerbated the regime's economic crisis. Meanwhile, oil prices fell back to just above $75 a barrel, and the war pain felt by American consumers significantly lessened.

"Things will be resolved. They always will be resolved. It's like a game of chess," Trump described the back-and-forth game with Iran.

Duane Patterson frankly stated:

"Hawks like myself who advocate for a tough stance against Iran are frustrated by the lack of meaningful momentum action.

A week has passed, and there is still no agreement." The regime in Tehran, led by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, has not surrendered, and aside from verbal bluster—claiming that by this time next year, Iran's tollbooth in the Strait of Hormuz will be gilded—nothing substantial has been achieved.

But in the Oval Office, when asked by reporters about the possibility of a deal with Iran, Trump said, "I don't think they'll last much longer."

Based on what I've recently seen in open-source information, this assessment closely aligns with publicly available evidence, and the president clearly possesses intelligence far exceeding what is publicly available.

For the Iranian regime, the most lethal target of reckoning has never been the United States or Israel, but its own people.

Iranians understand their country's true economic potential and know they should be better off. The revolutionary ideology of the Islamic Republic is dead.

The regime can temporarily evade external accountability, but the harshest punishment it faces now is being forced to confront domestic realities—an economy that, without the cover of a state of war, would immediately expose hyperinflation, mass unemployment, corrupt trade, war losses, and a paralyzed political system.

Iran has never been so diplomatically isolated, its share of global trade plummeting from 2.2% to less than 0.02%. They virtually cease manufacturing or exporting anything that requires personnel outside the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or the Basij—people who have gone months without pay. Even companies from friendly nations refuse to do business with them due to the risks of sanctions and war.

Currently, only about 35% of working-age Iranians are actually employed, and the minimum wage covers only about a quarter of the actual cost of living. While the official unemployment rate is slightly below 10%, seemingly not catastrophic, the reality is entirely different when you consider that only 40% of the able-bodied are still actively seeking work, while the rest have long since given up looking for jobs that don't even exist.

The rial's plunge against the dollar is equally catastrophic, and there are currently no signs of it bottoming out.

@FloppingAces:

[The media keeps asking: "Did Trump bomb Iran today?" No bombing today? That means "Trump backed down." Negotiations are underway? That means "Iran survived."

But the question is wrong.] The questions to ask are: Is Iran stronger today than it was three months ago? Is its economy healthier? Is the Strait of Hormuz more valuable? Is its military stronger?

Victor Hansen's view, while not as "exciting" as CNN, is more important: even without dropping bombs, Iran is failing—sanctions are still in effect, blockades are still exerting pressure, and financial isolation is still causing revenue losses. And the option of military strike remains on the table.

Later Monday (August 10), in a public interview, US President Trump accused Iran of being a "cunning negotiating partner." He also discussed his current strategy towards Iran, stating that he intends to either continue to wear Iran down (bop along), allowing its economy to collapse, or to give Iran a "very, very heavy blow."

“I’m negotiating, you could say,” Trump said in a phone interview with Real America’s Voice. “They’re very cunning negotiating partners.”

“Because they’ll agree to something first, then turn around and tell the media they never agreed to it. They’re very dishonest people,” Trump said in a video clip shared by the White House.

Since the conflict erupted in late February, US-Iran negotiations have been on and off. Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Asif, the mediator, told Bloomberg in Islamabad on Tuesday that the US and Iran were close to reaching “some kind of arrangement.”

Qatar stated that negotiations on controlling the Strait of Hormuz had entered a deeper stage. However, media reports indicate that ships transiting the area have been subjected to new attacks.

In an interview, Trump described one of his possible strategies: “Do what I’m doing right now: just wait and see how bad their situation gets.”

“Economically, they’re a mess. They can’t borrow. We control their money—that is, all the money they used to have, a huge amount. They used to have a lot of money, and now we have complete control of that money. I’m their banker,” he said. The president was referring to frozen Iranian assets.

As the Trump administration continues to economically pressure the Iranian regime, the U.S. is increasing its enforcement efforts, and the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports continues. The Wall Street Journal reported that a U.S. official said that U.S. forces fired on a Panamanian-flagged ship earlier on Tuesday that attempted to break through the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports.

According to the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), Iranian government spokesman Fatemeh Mohajerani stated in July that Iran was facing energy shortages; since the outbreak of conflict with the U.S. and Israel, it has lost approximately 230 million cubic meters of daily natural gas production capacity.

In an interview, Trump also stated that another option was to "give them a very, very heavy blow."

Regarding media reports about insufficient U.S. military ammunition reserves, the president stated that the U.S. is "producing ammunition like crazy."

"Our ammunition is fine... Although we are producing like crazy, the reason the stockpiles are low is because he (Biden) provided Ukraine with $300 billion worth of ammunition," Trump said.


Missing human rights lawyer still terrifies the CCP vs Zhu Rongji's death

 Direct translations China's "Democratically Elected President"? He terrifies the CCP — Gao Zhisheng "disappeared" f...