Thursday, July 2, 2020

Sanctions on CCP officials involved in Hong Kong National Security Law

Editor : Cheng Yiren
Publisher : New Tang Dynasty Television
Direct translation

Image : The picture shows that on October 14, 2019, when the Hong Kong people held a rally, a man was waving the American flag. (Anthony Wallace / AFP via Getty Images)


After the National People’s Congress passed the National Security Act on June 30, on July 1 (Wednesday), the US House of Representatives passed a bill to punish and enforce the National Security Law Chinese officials have banks that do business with each other, and will step up sanctions on relevant Chinese officials and the Hong Kong police.

Reuters reported that the House of Representatives unanimously agreed to pass the bill on Wednesday, reflecting Washington's concern that the Chinese Communist Party promulgated the National Security Law of the Hong Kong District as a measure to end Hong Kong's autonomy.

The US Senate passed a similar bill "Hong Kong Autonomy Act" last week. According to the provisions of the Congress, the bill passed by the House of Representatives must be passed to the Senate, and then sent to the White House for approval or veto by President Trump.

Earlier, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attended a House Committee hearing on the situation in Hong Kong. She said that the Minato City National Security Law symbolized the principle of "one country, two systems" is dead.

She said that the purpose of the National Security Act in the port area is to threaten, intimidate and suppress Hong Kong people. They just peacefully demand their long-deserved freedom.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the Minzu District National Security Act is a blatant insult to all countries, and Washington will continue to implement President Trump’s instructions to end special treatment for Hong Kong.

Earlier, the United States had begun to reduce its special treatment for Hong Kong, halted defense exports and regulated the entry and exit of high-tech products into and out of Hong Kong. The Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States Congress have also proposed the "Hong Kong Haven Act" to provide asylum priority to Hong Kong people. The bill stipulates that eligible Hong Kong people can apply in Hong Kong or a third country, and are not subject to the quota of similar asylum applications.

The Hong Kong Haven Act includes:
1. Leaders of non-governmental organizations supporting anti-send middle-level protests against the CCP’s violation of Hong Kong’s autonomy;
2. Protest organizers;
3. First aid personnel;
4. Reporters who reported injuries to the protest;
5. Those who provide legal services to arrested demonstrators;
6. People prosecuted, detained or convicted for participating in protests

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

Bannon criticized Western media for ignoring CCP's crimes and counterattacking The Epoch Times and NTD

Editor : Wen Ruo
Publisher : The Epoch Times, re-produced on NTD Television
Extract translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan
                                            / KUCINTA SETIA

Image : Web Screenshot


On 29 June 2020, Bannon, the former chief strategist of the White House, and Chinese rich businessman Guo Wengui said in the War Room of the political commentary program, The Epoch Times, NTD TV stations and Falun Gong practitioners insisted on exposing the CCP and reporting the truth, but they were attacked by some mainstream Western media that accepted the CCP’s heavy Communist ideology. Those media did not blame the CCP when SARS-CoV-2 (CCP virus) raged the world. The American people should be awakened.

The Chinese Communist Party's heavy influence on Western media disturbs the audience

Bannon first stated that after the factual evidence about the CCP virus was disclosed by the media created by Falun Gong practitioners and Guo Media, some mainstream Western media did not blame the CCP, which was one of the reasons that caused the CCP virus to spread globally.

He said, "What Americans don't understand is why when Gnews, Gtv, Epoch Times and NTDTV exposed a lot of evidence about the CCP virus, the media in the US and Europe did not ask the CCP?"

Guo Wengui pointed out that the CCP has invested heavily in Western media and has turned the media into a tool for the CCP to conceal its evil behavior. He said, "Behind all these media platforms, there is a lot of money from the CCP. The CCP's usual practice is to muddle the water. It does not want people to understand the truth, so it has to muddle the Western media first."

A registration document released by the US Department of Justice on June 10 revealed that the Chinese Communist Party, through its overseas English mouthpiece "China Daily", paid to the United States from November 2016 to April 2020 in the form of paying advertising and printing fees. Ten mainstream media and social media invested a total of 19 million US dollars. Among them, "Washington Post" and "Wall Street Journal" are the CCP's key investment targets, "China Daily" advertising costs for these two media are 4.6 million and 6 million US dollars.

The Ministry of Justice document also records that the New York Times and Foreign Policy received US$50,000 and US$240,000 respectively. The "Foreign Policy" issued to mainstream US political and business readers belongs to the "Washington Post" media group and was later renamed Graham Holdings Company. The controlling shareholder and chairman of the board of directors of Graham Holdings is the husband of Donald Amanda’s husband. Graham (Donald. Graham), Graham's main income is dependent on its Kaplan education company, the company in China and CITIC Group subsidiaries and other companies joint venture cooperation.

The CCP paid for these advertisements by inserting the supplement "China Watch" issued by "China Daily" into the above-mentioned newspapers in the form of an interleaved page, in this way instilling the CCP's ideology and "positive publicity" to American readers ".

In February this year, the U.S. State Department designated the five Chinese Communist Party official media Xinhua News Agency, China Global TV Network, China Radio International, China Daily and People’s Daily as "foreign missions" overseas. Foreign embassies likewise register information such as employees and property in the United States with the State Council.

The Ministry of Justice's public registration documents also disclosed that the "China Daily" paid as much as $7 million to print newspapers issued in several major US states. These newspapers include the Los Angeles Times, the Seattle Times, the Atlanta Constitution, the Chicago Tribune, the Houston Chronicle, and the Bolton Globe. The print service fees paid to the Los Angeles Times exceed 650,000 US dollars.

Falun Gong practitioners tell the truth and scare the CCP

Bannon said that the Western media turned a blind eye to the CCP’s crimes and instead attacked media such as Epoch Times, NTDTV and Gtv and Gnews who told the truth, and now Westerners need to realize that the media they watch speak for the CCP. He said, "Now is the time. The American people should be awakened. The European people should be awakened. The British people should be awakened. Their media has become a helper for China's outreach."

Guo Wengui believes that Western media slander Falun Gong practitioners because they are the only ones who dare to tell the truth. He said, "They are the only ones who are trying to tell the truth to the Western world, but the Western media, they are afraid of Falun Gong, and they want to defame Falun Gong because the media of Falun Gong practitioners tell the truth, which is why they are afraid."

A special issue published in the English version of The Epoch Times in April this year specifically reported that the CCP had covered up the outbreak of the CCP virus (New Crown Virus), resulting in the pandemic of the virus worldwide. The special issue includes a timetable showing how the Chinese Communist government conceals information about the epidemic and suppresses informants of the epidemic. It also covers the dissemination of false information by the Chinese Communist regime.


Shortly after the special issue was published in Canada, the National Radio Canada (CBC) accused the special issue of The Epoch Times by publishing articles and YouTube video programs, which caused some Canadians to feel disgusted, thinking that it was "racism" and "incite hatred." CBC has changed the title of the article four times, but its so-called Canadian feedback is based on interviews with individuals.

However, CBC's articles have aroused the resentment of its own readers. In the more than 3,000 comments after the article that attacked the Epoch Times, most of them opposed CBC's reports.

Current event commentator Sheng Xue said that she was convinced that CBC's behavior this time was not the accidental behavior of some journalists or editors, "it was someone's decision after careful thinking."

Only Epoch stands firm on the front line facing life and death

Guo Wengui said in a conversation with Bannon that Hong Kong people were a little bit excited when he said that the Hong Kong people sent back the Chinese movement last year. He said loudly that the Epoch Times reporters in Hong Kong faced threats of life and death during the anti-transmission campaign. They insisted on reporting for 24 hours, and because the "Era Times" dared to report the truth, the CCP was afraid.

He said, "Look at the Hong Kong Anti-Send China Movement, only the Falun Gong practitioners reported the truth and reported it 24 hours a day. Although they face the threat of death every minute on the streets of Hong Kong, they continue to communicate with the students in Hong Kong. The children are fighting together."

He went on to say that the Epoch Times of Hong Kong has timely and objectively spread what is happening in Hong Kong to the world. He said, "They didn't talk about religion, they didn't talk about politics, they just reported the truth and broadcast everything that happened in Hong Kong."

During the counter-transmission last year, The Epoch Times NTD reporters were repeatedly attacked by tear gas on the frontline interviews. Still afraid of hardships, they insisted on reporting the frontline truth to readers. (Song Bilong / Epoch Times)

Guo Wengui then went through the dangerous moments of several major global media in Hong Kong but disappeared. He said, "Where does the New York Times go? Where does the Financial Times go, Where does the BBC go, and where does CNN go? Only the reporters of The Epoch Times were there, and even we broke the news that the revolution could not do that kind of report because it was too dangerous."

During the six-month anti-send protest movement, frontline reporters from Hong Kong Epoch Times and NTDTV were repeatedly hit by police tear gas and pepper spray. On the evening of June 12 this year, the Epoch Times reporter was suddenly attacked by a white man with a knife in a Kwun Tong report on the first anniversary of the "6.12" anti-delivery campaign, and was rescued by a brave citizen at the scene , Resulting in the citizen's hand being cut and sent to hospital for treatment.

In the early morning of 19 November 2019, the printing plant that printed the Hong Kong Epoch Times was set on fire by the Chinese Communist Party, causing some printing equipment and newspapers of the day to be seriously damaged. The camera at the scene completely recorded the four murderers dressed in black and holding police telescopic sticks. They threatened the workers at the scene for a short period of time while spitting the prepared gasoline in the factory and ignited it. After burning, the four quickly escaped.

Since the founding of Hong Kong Epoch Times in 2000, the Chinese Communist Party has repeatedly hired murderers to destroy printing plants and printing equipment that print The Epoch Times. The arson of the hiring attracted the attention of the US Congress and prompted the US Senate to quickly pass the "Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Bill" which was then stuck.

On 10 June 2020, the "Global Religious Freedom Report 2019" released by the U.S. State Department specifically listed this case of the Chinese Communist Party’s arson. The report said: "The Hong Kong version of the printing house of the Epoch Times, a media founded by Falun Gong practitioners, Four masked men armed with similar batons were set on fire."

Guo Wengui: No one is allowed to blame Falun Gong again

Guo Wengui mentioned in the program that someone once asked him if he provided funds to Falun Gong. He blamed the other party for blaming Falun Gong practitioners, instead of paying attention to those who did not report that the CCP had concealed the truth of the virus.

He said, "Why do you blame Falun Gong in this way, why don't you ask the CCP how much the New York Times gave, how much it gave CNN, and how much it gave the Wall Street Journal? Why don't they talk about the truth about Hong Kong? Ask where the CCP virus came from and why China did not allow the world to investigate."

The War Room program of the day introduced the latest feature film "The Cover of the Century" produced by Epoch Media Group's column "World Care", which systematically exposed the CCP's entire process of concealing the virus. Producer Xiao Ming introduced in an interview in the War Room that "The Cover of the Century" has been watched more than 500,000 times in 10 hours.

Guo Wengui said loudly at the end of the show, "No one is allowed to blame Xiao Ming's program, and no one is allowed to blame Falun Gong again."



The provisions in the National Security Law of Hong Kong are inconsistent with the Basic Law

Report by : Gan Yung Chyan
                  / KUCINTA SETIA


The Hong Kong Bar Association issued a statement today (July 1) on the legislation of the "National Security Law of Hong Kong", expressing serious concern about the content and legislative approach of the legislation, arguing that it would undermine the guarantee of a high degree of autonomy for Hong Kong in the "Sino-British Joint Declaration". It also weakens Hong Kong's core values ​​of judicial independence, human rights and freedom protection under one country, two systems. The Guild also pointed out that some of the provisions of the National Security Law of Hong Kong are inconsistent with the provisions of the Basic Law.

The Bar Association said that before the NPC legislation, the citizens had not read the provisions. The law is now in effect and the provisions are not even in English, pointing out that this is contrary to the current bilingual legal system in Hong Kong. The guild also stated that Article 62 of the National Security Law of Hong Kong mentioned that if local laws were inconsistent with the National Security Law, the National Security Law would prevail.

The Bar Association is concerned that the National Security Office in Hong Kong has the right to enforce laws in Hong Kong, and the Central Government of the People’s Republic of China also retains jurisdiction, that is, suspects may be sent to the mainland for trial. This is different from the current arrangements for the transfer of fugitive offenders in Hong Kong. Lost the handover trial procedure and due legal protection. The guild is also concerned about the possibility of fair trial and adequate legal protection once the suspect is sent to the Mainland for trial.

The Bar Association is dissatisfied with the arrangements for the Chief Executive to designate judges to hear Guoan cases, believes that it will weaken judicial independence, and is concerned about the Department of Justice’s right to require cases without jury trials. The Guild stated that the National Security Law targets four types of crimes, but lacks clear guidelines, and believes that the law is not directly proportional to violations of basic human rights, including affecting freedom of thought and freedom of expression.

Source : Ming Pao

The Hong Kong version of the National Security Law governs people all over the world

Reporter : Yang Zheng 
Editor : Yuan Mingqing
Publisher : Sound Of Hope
Direct translation

The CCP’s Hong Kong version of the National Security Law was officially signed on 30 June. Yesterday evening, the official media of the Communist Party of China announced the full text of the bill. Article 38 of it can be said to shock the world, because the CCP adopted this article to bring the world into its jurisdiction, causing anger and ridicule from all walks of life. Some commentators pointed out that those enacting the law were either legally blind or deliberately expressing "one respect".

Article 38 of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law states that "People who do not have the permanent resident status of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, outside the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, shall apply this Law to the crimes committed by this Law against the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region."

This means that the scope of the provisions is unlimited. Anyone who discusses Hong Kong politicians, if the content involves crimes of separatism, subversion of state power, crimes of terrorist activities, crimes of collusion with foreign countries or foreign forces endangering national security, etc. Hong Kong or any corner of the world may breach the law.

Zhang Daming, a Hong Kong law expert and chief lecturer at the School of Law of the University of Hong Kong, told Voice of Germany that the content of the law clearly shows that the Chinese (CCP) government wants to control everything, because they can prevent political instability by doing so. Basically, the effectiveness of the National Security Law has been expanded to the whole world, and we can also understand this as the Chinese (CCP) government has extended the scope of its national security to the whole world.

Luke de Pulford, the founder of the charity and the Human Rights Commissioner of the House of Lords and the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom, tweeted, "This law is absurd. Article 38 states that non-Hong Kong citizens or even non-Hong Kong people who violate this law , Is also considered a crime, I guess that's me."

The famous British human rights activist Benedict Rogers tweeted sarcastically, "I call for (imposed on the CCP) sanctions, (assigned in Hong Kong) United Nations special envoy, rescue boat rescue (Hong Kong people). I think I have violated Article 38? "

Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian, a writer and Axios China reporter, exclaimed, "God, I really didn't look away???? Beijing just gave itself extraterritorial powers to everyone on the planet?"

Senior commentator Tang Jingyuan pointed out, "The unprecedented provision of such unpredictable provisions only shows that the people who formulate the National Security Law of the National People's Congress are either a group of second-hand pseudo-experts or laypersons who are legally blind, or they are deliberately bullying themselves. He can’t understand it-the bill must be signed by him before it can be promulgated and implemented."

Some netizens sarcastically said, "Not only the whole world, the entire universe is within the scope of Hong Kong National Security Law!" Some netizens scolded: "Too ridiculous! A law set by oneself to manage the whole world! Is the United Nations blind?"

More netizens said, "I will not go to Hong Kong in my life" and "I will pay special attention to the place of transfer in the future."

Andrew Nathan, a professor of political science at Columbia University, also reminded that those who support democracy overseas in Hong Kong may need to be vigilant when traveling internationally to circumvent the extradition treaty with the Chinese Communist Party.

Xiao Ruoyuan, a well-known Hong Kong writer and famous TV screenwriter, said that the CCP will kill itself because of Article 38. "Now all foreign countries will warn their citizens because they are likely to have violated the law in foreign countries. 'The behaviour was arrested in Hong Kong. This must have a major impact on the status of Hong Kong's international financial centre."


Towards a safer journey through Changi Airport

Press Release : Changi Airport Group


Changi Airport has begun transforming the passenger experience with new contactless and cleaning innovations for a safer, but yet seamless, airport journey. These measures will be rolled out airport-wide in preparation for when air travel into and out of Singapore gradually resumes.


At Changi’s automated kiosks, new proximity sensors are being installed progressively to eliminate the need for travellers to touch the electronic screens when they check in or drop off their bags. Used for the first time in any airport, infrared sensors will enable passengers to select options and key in their travel details by pointing their finger close to the screen without touching it. For those who need to check in at counters staffed by customer service agents, acrylic screens will provide a safe barrier between passengers and staff.


Changi’s contactless passenger experience will also extend to immigration. The Immigration & Checkpoints Authority has upgraded the automated immigration lanes at Changi Airport with a new biometric system that uses face and iris recognition technology as the primary means for identity verification. This replaces traditional fingerprint scanning.


Changi Airport Group (CAG) is also doing more with technology to clean and disinfect the airport. Autonomous cleaning robots in the terminals have been upgraded with a nozzle that sprays a light disinfecting mist for added protection on carpets and floors during cleaning. CAG is also testing the use of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) LEDs to disinfect the handrails of escalators and travellators in a safe way. A trial is also being conducted on the use of contactless infrared technology for passenger lifts, where travellers just need to hover their finger over the lift button to activate it.


These new contactless and cleaning innovations build on Changi Airport’s previously introduced precautionary measures against Covid-19. These include temperature screening at key points, safe distancing, use of masks by all passengers and staff, increased cleaning and disinfecting, widespread introduction of sensor-activated “auto” hand sanitisers and the use of a long-lasting antimicrobial spray on frequently touched surfaces for added protection against pathogens.


Mr Tan Lye Teck, Changi Airport Group’s Executive Vice President for Airport Management said, “Passengers will expect airports to deliver the highest standards of safety and hygiene to give them peace of mind during their journey, and we will rapidly bring on board new measures as we go into a new normal for air travel. The improvements we announce today demonstrate CAG’s continuous commitment to passenger health and a positive airport experience. CAG will work with other aviation partners to instill a high sense of confidence among travellers going through Changi Airport when air travel eventually resumes.”

U.S. reacts to the Hong Kong version of National Security Act on the first day of promulgation

Reporter : Luo Tingting
Editor : Wen Hui
Publisher : New Tang Dynasty Television
Direct translation

Image : On the first day of the introduction of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, the White House issued a statement vowing to take strong action to "strike those who stifle Hong Kong's freedom and autonomy." The picture shows that on July 1, Hong Kong people took to the streets to protest the National Security Law. (Billy H.C. Kwok/Getty Images)

On the first day of the introduction of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, the White House issued a statement that strongly condemned the CCP’s violation of international commitments and vowed to take strong actions to "strike those who stifle Hong Kong’s freedom and autonomy." ". Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives of the US Congress, also issued a statement calling on President Trump to use all tools to sanction Chinese Communist Party officials who oppress Hong Kong's freedom and autonomy.

The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of the Communist Party of China hurriedly passed the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law on the morning of June 30, and it came into effect at 11 pm local time. The bill specifies four crimes including the crime of separatism, the crime of subverting the state power, the crime of terrorist activities, and the crime of colluding with foreign or foreign forces to endanger national security.

Pelosi issued a statement on July 1 stating that Beijing chose to pass the National Security Law of the Minato City on the eve of the 23rd anniversary of the transfer of Hong Kong's sovereignty, showing that "one country, two systems" is dead.

The purpose of Beijing’s passage of the bill is to expand the right to suppress Hong Kong’s freedom of protest and expression, and to use this brutal law to deter, intimidate and oppress the people of Hong Kong who demand peace for freedom.

She called on all freedom-loving people to condemn Beijing for passing a law that accelerates the erosion of Hong Kong's political and economic freedom.

Pelosi also once again urged President Trump to use the Magnitsky Act and the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act to hold accountable and sanction Chinese Communist Party officials who violated Hong Kong’s freedom and autonomy. .

"We must consider all available tools, including visa restrictions and economic sanctions." Pelosi emphasized.

John Ullyot, a spokesman for the White House National Security Council, said in a statement: "Beijing passed the National Security Law in violation of its commitments made in the Sino-British Joint Declaration." "The United States will Continue to take strong action against those who stifle Hong Kong's freedom and autonomy."

Uliot said, "Since Beijing now treats Hong Kong with "one country, one system", so must the United States. We urge Beijing to immediately reverse its direction."

Democratic senator Chris Van Hollen tweeted: "Those who stifle Hong Kong’s freedom, democracy and human rights must be held accountable. House Speaker Pelosi should immediately convene the Hong Kong Accountability Act (Also known as the Hong Kong Autonomy Law) to vote and the Senate unanimously passed this bill last week."

Republican Senator Tom Cotton also tweeted that Xi Jinping and his Communist mob must face the severe consequences of undermining Hong Kong’s freedom.

He said that the US government should consider all options and refuse Beijing to benefit from the special financial and economic status of Hong Kong (given by the US).

Democrat Jim McGovern, chairman of the United States Congress and the Executive Committee on China Issues (CECC), tweeted that the Minzu District National Security Law has allowed the CCP’s secret police to suppress the people of Hong Kong. He called on the US and the international community to take strong measures to assist the people of Hong Kong and hold the Chinese government accountable.

McGovern believes that for those who are forced to flee Hong Kong, the US executive and legislative departments should support the establishment of avenues for seeking refuge for them. Congress should also pass laws to stop the export of defense and security equipment to Hong Kong.

Republican Senator Rick Scott said in a tweet that the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law allows the CCP to further suppress demonstrations and dissidents in Hong Kong, but he emphasized that the United States will not betray the brave soldiers who pursue democracy and will continue to be Oppressed people vocalize.

Republican Senator Josh Hawley pointed out in a tweet that Beijing’s implementation of anti-democratic national security laws will be a sad day for Hong Kong and the world. He said the question to ask now is whether Beijing will use the new law as an excuse to imprison pan-popular leaders.

Hawley said: "The United States must remain vigilant and be prepared to take further sanctions."

The day before the passage of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, the US Department of Commerce announced on June 29 that it would revoke the special status of Hong Kong and suspend the implementation of preferential treatment rules for Hong Kong, including the provision of export license exemptions.

On the same day, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement saying that Beijing’s actions prevented the United States from distinguishing Hong Kong from mainland China and stopped exporting controlled defense equipment to Hong Kong as of today.

Pompeo also announced on June 26 that it would impose visa restrictions on former and current CCP officials who violated Hong Kong's autonomy.

On July 1, the people of Hong Kong took to the streets to protest against the threat and intimidation of the National Security Law. Many Hong Kong people said that the passage of the National Security Law has strengthened their confidence in "taking back Hong Kong."

Wang Dingyu: "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" not only stifles Hong Kong, but also intends to suppress the world

Reporter : Fiji Zhen
Editor : Yun Tian
Publisher : Sound Of Hope
Direct translation

The Communist Party of China "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" was announced at 11 pm on 30 June and takes effect from 12 am of 1 July 2020. The full text of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" has a greater penalty and width than expected, and is applicable to crimes committed by non-Hong Kong people or not in Hong Kong. In this regard, Su Zhenchang said today that this is terrifying legislation, not only against Hong Kong people, but also against non-Hong Kong people. The DPP legislator Wang Dingyu said that the CCP not only stifles Hong Kong, but also intends to suppress the world. He suggested that everyone's self-protection approach is not to go to Hong Kong, not to transfer in Hong Kong, or to board Hong Kong or Chinese airlines. He asked back, "Is there such a future in Hong Kong?"

Su Zhenchang

Image : Su Zhenchang said today that this is terrifying legislation, not only against Hong Kong people, but also against people of other countries. (Screenshot of the Liberty Times video)

According to the content of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" announced last night, its jurisdiction has a very large scope of effect, and the organization of "Taiwan independence" and committing crimes in Taiwan may apply. A foreigner exercising local freedom of speech in a foreign country advocating Hong Kong independence may also be arrested, prosecuted, sentenced or deported in Hong Kong.

The content also mentions that as long as one of the "criminal acts or results" occurs in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, it will be considered a crime in Hong Kong; in addition, Hong Kong permanent residents or corporate groups established in Hong Kong, even if committed in areas outside Hong Kong, the crimes stipulated in this law also apply.

The Hong Kong version of the National Security Law clearly stipulates 4 counts of up to life imprisonment: the crimes of "separatism", "crimes of subversion of state power", "crimes of terrorist activities", "crimes of collusion with foreign or foreign forces endangering national security". Even the broadly defined "incitement to split the country" can be punished.

Regarding the content of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" bill of global concern, Su Zhenchang, the chief executive of Taiwan, said in an interview today that he is not a Hong Kong person or is not in Hong Kong. As long as he speaks to make Hong Kong people dislike Hong Kong or the Chinese government, they can be prosecuted. He commented with grim, "This is terrible legislation. I have never seen it like this."

Su Zhenchang said that this legislative approach has not been seen in the whole world, which means that the Chinese government has shown its true face, which can also make it more clear that the Chinese government’s commitment to Hong Kong for 50 years has not been completely broken. He repeatedly emphasized that "this is terrible legislation."

Wang Dingyu Facebook

Image : DPP legislator Wang Dingyu said on Facebook that the CCP is not only stifling Hong Kong and suppressing the rights and freedom of Hong Kong people, but also wants to extend its tentacles to all countries in the world and intend to suppress the world. (Picture/Wang Dingyu Facebook)

The Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Dingyu posted on Facebook early this morning that Article 38 of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Act "People who do not have the status of permanent residents of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall implement the provisions of this Law against the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region outside the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. This law applies.” This means that the CCP is not only stifling Hong Kong and suppressing the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong people, but also extending its tentacles to all countries in the world with the intention of suppressing the world.

Wang Dingyu said that anyone who makes legal remarks in their own country or on their own social networking site, "As long as the Chinese Communist Party feels uncomfortable, the Chinese Communist Party can arrest you with this decree and send you to China" for 10 years in prison or life imprisonment. "

Regarding such "evil laws", Wang Dingyu said that the way for people of all countries to protect themselves is not to go to Hong Kong, not to transit in Hong Kong, or board Hong Kong or Chinese airlines. However, he also asked back, can such a Hong Kong have a future?

Egyptair launches cargo flight to Hanoi on 27 October 2026

 Report, photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUICNTA SETIA Egyptair Cargo, the freighter unit of Egyptair, launches direct flight to Hanoi ...