Ants died after eating Chinese jerky snacks that fell on the ground

 Direct Translation

Horrifying! Chinese jerky crumbs fell on the ground and ants ate them all, killing them completely

Editor : Li Enzhen / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2026/05/20/a104098258.html / Image : Recently, a parent in Hainan discovered that ants had eaten all the jerky their child had dropped, and died. (Video screenshot/composite image)

On 20 May 2026, the topic of "children's jerky snacks falling on the ground and ants eating them all, killing them completely" became a trending topic. The related video sparked concerns among mainland Chinese citizens about food safety.

On 17  May 2026, a netizen in Hainan posted on social media, "My child bought jerky snacks and dropped them on the ground, and the ants ate them and all died. What kind of ingredients are so potent? It's terrifying. I refuse to let my children eat these things."

The video uploaded by this netizen shows that it is a flavored snack called "hand-shredded chicken jerky" from a mainland Chinese brand. Crumbs of dried meat fell on the floor, attracting a large number of ants that ate them, causing them to die within a short time. The scene was chilling.

How terrifying! Crumbs of hand-shredded dried meat from mainland China fell on the floor, and after being eaten by ants, all the ants died. pic.twitter.com/e5bTSLjw8P

— Tiantian (@tiantian108) May 20, 2026

According to the ingredients listed on the packaging, the dried meat contains ethyl maltol (flavour enhancer) and sodium nitrite (preservative).

Mainland media reported that ethyl maltol emits a sweet aroma that attracts ants, while sodium nitrite causes them to suffocate by inhibiting the oxygen-carrying capacity of cells; the synergistic effect is similar to the principle of commercial insecticide baits. The ants died because they are tiny (weighing about 5 milligrams) and have a fast metabolic rate.

Sodium nitrite is a preservative commonly used in meat products. It inhibits the growth of Clostridium botulinum, extends shelf life, and keeps the meat bright red. However, under certain conditions, it may generate nitrosamines, a potent carcinogen.

Children's metabolic systems are not yet fully developed, and long-term or excessive consumption of processed meat products containing sodium nitrite may increase health risks. This also reminds parents that when choosing snacks for their children, they should not only consider the taste and packaging, but also pay attention to whether the ingredients are safe and reasonable.

Related videos have sparked concerns among netizens about food safety: "This is terrifying, don't give it to your children." "If ants die from eating it, people will also be affected if they eat too much." "People will suffer from chronic poisoning if they eat too much."

"A new type of insecticide." "I suspect the amount added is still excessive." "The ant poison I bought online can't kill ants at all, I never thought my child's snacks could kill ants."

"Some snacks may contain excessive or abused additives, especially off-brand products. Long-term consumption of high-salt, high-additive snacks may increase the burden on children's liver and kidneys and affect taste development (such as dependence on strong flavors)."

Under the CCP's rule, morality has declined, and food safety in mainland China has reached an intolerable level. Counterfeiting techniques are emerging endlessly, and the proliferation and harmfulness of toxic additives are shocking. In recent years, a series of food safety incidents have occurred, including "tainted milk powder," "lean meat powder," "gutter oil," "colored steamed buns," "toxic rice," "over 2,000 kinds of additives," and "tanker trucks carrying mixed cooking oil." These egregious food safety incidents clearly demonstrate the severity of the lack of integrity and moral decline.

Seven frugal habits might actually make people poorer

 Direct Translation

Thinking you're saving money? These seven frugal habits might actually make you poorer

Editor: Li Hua / Source: World Journal / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0520/2385920.html / Image : While bulk supermarkets like Costco or Sam's Club have lower unit prices, buying too much and ending up with uneaten or expired items can lead to waste. (Reporter Ziwei/Photography)

Under inflationary pressures, many people resort to price comparisons, coupon clipping, or reusing disposable items to save money. However, financial experts warn that some seemingly thrifty habits can actually consume a lot of time and energy, ultimately proving counterproductive.

A recent report by AOL highlighted "extreme couponing" as a common example. The report noted that some people spend 10 to 15 hours a week researching discounts, matching coupons, and planning shopping routes, only to save about $30. This equates to an hourly wage of just $3.

Another common misconception is that "making everything yourself is cheaper." Influenced by social media, many try making their own bread, laundry detergent, or cleaning supplies, but after factoring in the costs of ingredients, electricity, and time, it may not actually be cost-effective. For example, making bread requires electricity for flour, yeast, and an oven, and often takes several hours to prepare. While baking as a hobby is fine, if it's solely for saving money, the actual benefits may be limited.

Furthermore, many drivers deliberately take longer routes to refuel in order to save a few cents on gas. The report gives an example: if the price is 15 cents cheaper per gallon, but you have to drive 15 more miles, filling up a 12-gallon tank only saves about $1.80, which may not even cover the extra cost of the gas. Experts suggest using apps like GasBuddy or Upside to find cheaper gas stations near your usual route, rather than deliberately making long detours.

"Buying in bulk" was also mentioned. While stores like Costco and Sam's Club have lower unit prices, buying too much and letting it expire results in waste.

Some people habitually wash disposable items repeatedly, such as plastic resealable bags, aluminum foil, and paper plates, hoping to extend their lifespan. Experts say that spending 15 minutes a day doing this adds up to nearly two hours a week. For most people, this time would be better spent resting, working part-time, or doing something more worthwhile.

The report also mentions that "comparing prices across stores" doesn't necessarily save money. While supermarket A might offer milk for 50 cents cheaper, supermarket B might have lower egg prices, and supermarket C might have the best deals on vegetables, if the stores are far apart, the cost of travel expenses, vehicle wear and tear, and time could easily outweigh the savings.

As for the many people's enthusiasm for "checking every subscription service" and even repeatedly negotiating with customer service over a few dollars in monthly fees, experts believe that this behavior is sometimes more like procrastination, focusing energy on small expenditures while neglecting larger financial issues such as salary, insurance, loans, or investment planning.

International oil prices plunge 6%! Iran conflict may be about to take a major turn

 Direct Translations

International oil prices plunge 6%! Trump's words shock the market; Iran conflict may be about to take a major turn

Image : International oil prices fell about 6% on Wednesday (20 May). (Associated Press)

International oil prices fell about 6% on Wednesday (20 May 2026) after U.S. President Donald Trump stated that negotiations between the US and Iran had entered the final stage. However, due to ongoing supply disruptions in the Middle East, investors remain cautious about the outcome of the peace negotiations.

Brent crude futures closed down $6.26, or 5.63%, at $105.02 per barrel.

U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures fell $5.89, or 5.66%, to $98.26 per barrel.

Trump stated that negotiations with Iran have entered the final stage, but he also warned of further attacks unless Iran agrees to a deal.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said that Iran is ready to cooperate with other littoral states to develop a safe shipping agreement, but did not provide further details.

Despite signs of progress, some market participants and analysts remain wary of the outcome of the negotiations and the global supply tensions. They believe that even if the U.S. and Iran reach an agreement, the supply shortage could persist.

John Kilduff, a partner at Again Capital, said, "We must be cautious about these statements now, but the market has reacted quickly, beginning to reflect the hope that the situation can be resolved."

Citi analysts said on Tuesday that they expect Brent crude to rise to $120 a barrel in the short term, noting that the market is underestimating the risk of prolonged supply disruptions. Wood Mackenzie estimated that if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed until the end of the year, oil prices could even approach $200 a barrel.

Ref.: https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/5444211

US-Iran talks enter final stage; Trump doesn't rule out further military action, "All Preparations Completed"

Image : U.S. President Trump stated on the 20th that US-Iran talks have entered the final stage, and if Tehran does not agree to a peace agreement, the U.S. may take further military action. (Associated Press)

U.S. President Trump stated on the 20th that U.S.-Iran talks have entered the "final stage," and if Tehran does not agree to a peace agreement, the U.S. may take further military action; however, he also hinted that Washington is willing to wait for the "right answer."

Reuters reported that Trump, during a media interview at Joint Base Andrews on the 20th, stated that the situation in the Middle East is "at a critical point" and could escalate rapidly.

Trump's suspension of Operation Epic Fury against Iran in an effort to broker a ceasefire has lasted six weeks, but negotiations to end the war have made limited progress.

Trump told reporters on the 20th, "Believe me, if we don't get the right answers, things will move very quickly. We're fully prepared." When asked how much time he would give diplomatic channels, Trump said, "Maybe a few days, but maybe very quickly."

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned that if the United States launches another attack, it will expand the war beyond the Middle East. On the 18th, Iran announced the formal establishment of the Persian Gulf Straits Authority (PGSA), attempting to strengthen control over the Strait of Hormuz.

On 20 May, Trump reiterated that he would never allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, stating, "We're in the final stages on the Iran issue. Let's wait and see. Either we reach an agreement, or we'll take some ugly measures, but hopefully that won't happen."

He added, "Ideally, I'd like to see fewer deaths, not a large number of casualties. We can achieve either."

Meanwhile, Turkish authorities confirmed that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had spoken with Trump by phone. Erdogan welcomed the extension of the ceasefire and believed a "reasonable solution" could be found.

Iranian Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated on social media on 20 May that "obvious and covert actions by the enemy" indicated that the United States was preparing for a new wave of attacks.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated that Tehran remained willing to negotiate, but added in a social media post, "Forcing Iran to surrender through threats is nothing but a fantasy."

Ref.: https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5444140

Trump: Public discontent in Iran boils over; Turmoil will be "Unprecedented"

Reporter : Wang Ziyi / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2026/05/20/a104098467.html

Let's turn our attention back to the Middle East situation. Today, President Trump pointed out that the U.S.-Iran ceasefire negotiations have entered the final stage, and the key point now is whether Iran will accept the agreement. Although he hopes to minimize casualties, he will order a new wave of strikes if forced to. Iran, on the other hand, stated that it has used the ceasefire period to rebuild its military capabilities and threatened to spread the war beyond the Middle East.

Earlier, the U.S. military instructed Marines to board the Iranian-flagged commercial oil tanker "Skysea" in the Gulf of Oman for a search.

The Central Command issued a statement indicating that the "Skysea" was suspected of violating the US blockade order and attempting to enter an Iranian port. Subsequently, after the US military searched the vessel and instructed the crew to change course, the "Skysea" was released.

Currently, a total of 91 merchant ships have turned back under U.S. military orders.

The U.S.-Iran ceasefire has entered its sixth week. President Trump earlier stated that the ceasefire negotiations have entered the "final stage," but he also reiterated his warning that he would resume military strikes if Iran does not reach an agreement.

Trump: "The only question is, will we send troops to completely crush Iran, or will Iran be willing to sign an agreement? We'll wait and see."

He mentioned that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu will do as he says regarding military action against Iran.

Trump: "He will do whatever I tell him to do. He's a great guy to me. He's a really good guy."

President Trump stated that he is not in a hurry to end the conflict and repeatedly emphasized his desire for as few casualties as possible.

Trump: "I'm not in a hurry. I prefer to keep the casualties to a very small number rather than a large number of casualties." "Iran is currently filled with intense anger because the people are living in extremely difficult conditions. Unprecedented turmoil is brewing there, and we are waiting to see what happens."

Iran's chief negotiator and parliamentary speaker, Ghalibaf, stated earlier that the U.S. actions indicated a new round of war was imminent. He also claimed that the military had used the ceasefire period to rebuild its combat capabilities and restore its strength.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps threatened that if the U.S. launches another attack, it will spread the war beyond the Middle East.

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bagheei told Brazilian media that negotiations between Tehran and Washington "are continuing through mediators from Pakistan."

However, reports indicate that Iran's new proposal to the US this week reiterated terms that President Trump had previously explicitly rejected. These include demands for control of the Strait of Hormuz, war reparations, the lifting of sanctions, the unfreezing of frozen assets, and the withdrawal of US troops.

Since the outbreak of the war, Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz, using it to impose tolls on passage. The US has repeatedly reiterated that this is unacceptable.

However, earlier, two Chinese supertankers carrying approximately 4 million barrels of oil left the strait.

Meanwhile, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs also pointed out that a South Korean oil tanker was cooperating with Iranian forces to transit the strait.

Faced with shipping disruptions, a land-based logistics network bypassing the Strait of Hormuz and traversing the Arabian Desert is rapidly taking shape. The Wall Street Journal reported that producers and exporters are establishing a transcontinental logistics network between the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea, using rail and truck transport.

Lai Ching-te will have a direct phone call with Trump after 20 May 2026

 Direct Translations

Trump to call Lai Ching-te before decision on arms sale? Trump: I will talk to him

Reporter : Wei Guojin,Taipei / https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/5444075 / Image : Trump stated that he will speak with President Lai Ching-te before making a decision on arms sales. (AFP)

According to a post by the White House Rapid Response account "@RapidResponse47" at 9:48 pm tonight, when asked by reporters, "Do you plan to call Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te before making a decision on arms sales?", President Trump responded, "I will talk to him, I will talk to everyone. We have complete control of the situation. We have had a very good meeting with President Xi, and we will handle the Taiwan issue."

Original text as follows:

Q: "Do you have any plans to call President Lai of Taiwan before you make a decision on the weapons package?"

A: "I'll speak to him. I speak to everybody. We have that situation very well in hand. We had a great meeting with President Xi... we'll work on that, the Taiwan problem."

"Do you have any plans to call President Lai of Taiwan before you make a decision on the weapons package?" @POTUS: "I'll speak to him. I speak to everybody. We have that situation very well in hand. We had a great meeting with President Xi... we'll work on that, the Taiwan… pic.twitter.com/nTUcNUyg1T

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) May 20, 2026

Trump confirms he will speak with Lai Ching-te; Arms sales to Taiwan to be approved?

U.S. President Donald Trump said today (20 May) that he will speak with ROC President Lai Ching-te. This timing is highly sensitive, as the US is currently considering whether to approve a $14 billion arms sale to Taiwan.

Before boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, Trump was asked by reporters whether he would speak with Lai Ching-te before making a decision on the arms sale. Trump replied, "I will talk to him. I talk to everyone. We have the situation under very good control."

While he did not specify when the call would take place, Trump mentioned last week upon returning to the US from his visit to China that he had discussed the Taiwan issue in detail with Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping, including arms sales to Taiwan.

Trump also said at the time that he would make a decision on the arms sale in a short time and would also speak with "the person governing Taiwan." He also emphasized that he had not made any commitments to Xi Jinping on the Taiwan issue.

Lai Ching-te responded today, saying that if he had the opportunity to speak with Trump by phone, he would tell him that Taiwan's strengthening of its defense and its purchase of weapons from the United States are for the purpose of protecting Taiwan's security and maintaining stability in the Taiwan Strait, and he hopes the arms purchase plan can continue.

The U.S. Congress passed the $14 billion arms sale to Taiwan last year, but whether it will be implemented ultimately depends on Trump's decision.

In an interview with Fox News last week, Trump also discussed the Taiwan issue. He said that the U.S. policy towards Taiwan has not changed, and it does not want to see anyone pursue independence, which could ultimately lead to a war in the Taiwan Strait, but he did not rule out the possibility of approving the arms sale.

He said, "If we maintain the current status quo, I think China can accept it. But we don't want anyone to think, 'Since the US supports us, let's just become independent.'"

Although the CCP has never ruled Taiwan for a single day, Beijing has consistently claimed sovereignty over Taiwan and has repeatedly threatened to use force. The Taiwanese government emphasizes that Taiwan's future can only be decided by the Taiwanese people themselves.

In recent years, as the CCP has continued to increase military pressure on Taiwan, Taiwan has also continued to strengthen its defense. Trump has previously stated that a war in the Taiwan Strait will not occur during his term.

Ref.: https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2026/05/20/a104098415.html

For the first time in 47 years, Trump will speak with Lai Ching-te, escalating U.S.-Taiwan interaction

Reporter : Lin Xi / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2026/05/20/a104098469.html

On 20 May 2026, US President Trump revealed that he will speak with Republic of China (Taiwan) President Lai Ching-te to discuss arms sales to Taiwan. This news has attracted widespread attention; if a formal call takes place, it will be the first in 47 years.

President Lai Ching-te stated on Wednesday (20 May) that if given the opportunity to speak directly with U.S. President Trump, he will express his desire to continue arms sales to Taiwan. This is a necessary condition for maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, especially given the ongoing threats from the Chinese Communist Party.

President Trump responded that the government will make a decision on the plan to sell $14 billion worth of weapons to Taiwan in the near future.

Reporter: "Before formally deciding on arms sales to Taiwan, do you plan to speak with President Lai Ching-te of the Republic of China?"

U.S. President Trump: "I will talk to him. I will talk to everyone. We have the situation under very good control."

Observers believe that the U.S. and Taiwan echo each other's positions on arms sales and security issues, and the atmosphere of bilateral policy interaction continues to warm.

Sheng Hsueh, Vice Chairman of the Civil Human Rights Front: "He (Trump) has indeed taken a series of very unconventional approaches towards Taiwan. For example, during his first term, he sold F-16V fighter jets and HIMARS multiple launch rockets to Taiwan. In December 2025, he added $11 billion in defense funding, and now he has $14 billion in arms sales on the table. So President Trump is using the most concrete institutional and legal protective measures to build Taiwan's counter-offensive capabilities."

Recently, the CCP announced the results of the Sino-U.S. trade consultations, and the military issue between the US and Taiwan has simultaneously heated up.

Sheng Hsueh: "In President Trump's logic, restoring U.S.-China trade is to ensure US economic interests, which also involves US national security. This is actually a very clear and strong signal (from Trump) is sending to Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping has repeatedly emphasized that the Taiwan Strait is the CCP's bottom line, and President Trump is also telling Xi Jinping that peace and security in the Taiwan Strait are also a strategic red line for the U.S.. He will not accept blackmail, and there is no room for bargaining."

Analysts believe this highlights that US-China relations are exhibiting a dual-track pattern of maintained economic engagement and continued security competition, with the Taiwan Strait situation remaining a core focus of the two countries' rivalry.

Sheng Hsueh, Vice Chairman of the Civil Human Rights Front: "This appears to be President Trump's two-pronged approach, separating trade and strategy. This is also an atypical aspect of his diplomatic art. It also highlights the important position of the Taiwan Strait situation within President Trump's global strategy."

Sheng Hsueh, Vice Chairman of the Civil Human Rights Front: "I believe he (Trump) will make the best arrangements regarding arms sales to Taiwan. I even envision him breaking the biggest taboo since the severing of diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Taiwan during his term—arranging a meeting with President Lai Ching-te."

If the dialogue takes place, it will be the first time in nearly half a century that a sitting US president has spoken directly with the president of the Republic of China (Taiwan).

See also: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78qv3w4xzqo

Xi's attempt to steal a chicken backfires! Lai Ching-te will have a direct phone call with Trump

-—Breaking news! The President of the Republic of China is about to have a regular phone call with Trump!

Reporters : Sun Ruihou, Wang Duruo / Editor : Fang Xun / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0520/2385823.html / Image : Web Screenshot

Latest news: ROC President Lai Ching-te is about to have a phone call with US President Trump! According to Taiwan's *Era Evening News*, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is actively arranging the call between the two presidents, which is expected to take place shortly after 20 May 2026.

Previously, Trump stated on his return trip to the U.S. after his trip to Beijing that he would "talk to the people governing Taiwan" before deciding on arms sales to Taiwan. This statement has sparked considerable attention regarding whether Trump might directly speak with President Lai Ching-te. ROC Representative to the US Yu Ta-wei, in an interview with CBS, stated, "We can wait and see." DPP caucus whip Chuang Jui-hsiung also indicated that he welcomes increased communication between the U.S. president and the Taiwanese ruling team.

After President Trump stated that "arms sales to Taiwan are a bargaining chip in negotiations with the CCP," Defense Minister Gu Lixiong, in an interview at the Legislative Yuan on the 19th, still expressed a "cautiously optimistic" attitude.

Gu Lixiong emphasized, "According to the Taiwan Relations Act, we are full of confidence in maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait." He pointed out that even in the face of changes in U.S.-China relations, the US commitment to arms sales to Taiwan will not be easily shaken, and Taiwan will continue to strengthen its self-defense capabilities and maintain close communication with the U.S..

KMT Chairperson Cheng Li-wen has been vehemently opposing the defense budget cuts, and there is also some opposition within the party. KMT Legislator Lai Shih-pao pointed out that the special defense budget has been cut from NT$1.25 trillion to NT$780 billion, a reduction of NT$470 billion, which will seriously affect Taiwan's defense autonomy, industrial transformation, and employment opportunities! "Peace and stability cannot rely solely on others; we must also work hard ourselves!"

In response, Aboluowang commentator Wang Duran analyzed that Xi Jinping originally wanted to use the Xi-Trump meeting to pressure Trump to reduce arms sales to Taiwan, but the result was a "backfire." Not only did he fail to persuade Trump, but it may have even led to the first direct phone call between Trump and Lai Ching-te, resulting in a major reversal of the situation. Trump has never formally spoken with Lai Ching-te before. If this hotline takes place, it would symbolize a further escalation of high-level interactions between the U.S. and Taiwan, and could potentially be the most embarrassing moment for Beijing since the Trump-Xi meeting.

Latest news from Mr. Tao Miao: The Lai-Trump hotline is about to begin!

President Lai Ching-te of the Republic of China is about to speak with President Trump!

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is arranging the call between the two presidents, which should take place shortly after 20 May. 🔥

Vance : Hold the border, keep fighting!

 Direct Translation

"Hold the border, keep fighting!" Vance fires a powerful blow

Report by : Mr. Tao Miao / Editor: Fang Xun / Source : X / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0520/2385825.html

 🚨Latest: US Vice President JD Vance launches a powerful attack from the White House! He strongly supports Western patriots resisting the influx of Third World immigrants and criticizes British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for labeling opponents as "far-right"! 🇺🇸🇬🇧

Vance boldly encouraged the British people: "To all my British friends who reject Third World immigrants, keep fighting! Defending your own culture is perfectly fine!"

He stated bluntly: "Some in the West think that bringing in millions of unscreened immigrants will bring prosperity? We utterly reject this absurd idea!"

"Wanting to live in safe communities, wanting jobs for your own people and neighbours, not strangers, is perfectly reasonable!"

"Western people have the right to control who enters their country, yet the media portrays this as racism… but the real victims are low-income Black and Hispanic Americans, and Britain is no exception!"

"To make America great again, we must guard our borders! I also encourage our British friends to follow the same path!" 🔥

Miao's comment: Absolutely right! 👍‼

PRC flag upside down, anchors reversed, signals of "overthrowing Xi"

 Direct Translation

Major incident at CCTV? National flag upside down, anchors reversed, signals of "overthrowing Xi" spread like wildfire online!

Reporter, editing : Wang He / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0520/2385812.html / Images : Video Screenshots

On 16 May 2026, a video footage of CCTV's news channel displaying completely upside down went viral online, igniting public outrage. In the footage, the presenter's face was upside down, the rocket launch footage was head-down, and commercials and special programs were all flipped. Even more shockingly, the Chinese Communist national flag was also prominently displayed upside down.

Reportedly, other channels were functioning normally, but CCTV's news channel alone experienced this unprecedented technical anomaly. Netizens were instantly outraged, with the phrase "This is confirmed—the truth has been distorted" quickly flooding the comments section.

Is this really just a simple technical glitch?

On the surface, it might just be a temporary malfunction in the broadcast control system but a closer look reveals a chilling truth: As the CCP's core official mouthpiece, CCTV has long represented the national propaganda system, and its technical capabilities are arguably world-class. How likely is it that such a basic error—the Chinese national flag and the entire news footage—could occur?

Even more intriguing details follow:

The Chinese national flag was displayed upside down—the five-starred red flag facing downwards is a highly sensitive image in any serious setting, often seen as a symbol of the "flipping" and "falling" of the nation, regime, and even supreme power;

Rocket launch footage showed the rocket flying upside down—a national project originally symbolizing "takeoff" and "ascension" visually appeared as "falling";

News anchors broadcasting upside down—images that have long been used to project "positive energy" were completely flipped;

Most importantly: only the news channel experienced the problem, while other channels remained unaffected. This precise "selective malfunction" seems more like a deliberate, specially released signal.

Some netizens directly concluded: this is not a malfunction, but rather someone within CCTV is releasing a signal in the most dangerous and direct way—Xi is about to fall.

Even the national flag was upside down; the implication is self-evident.

The deeper metaphors behind "upside-down" and "falling flags"

In the Chinese political context, the word "fall" has always been extremely sensitive.

Fall, defection, countdown, change of power… every word is inextricably linked to power transitions and political upheavals.

Therefore, some question whether CCTV's decision to have its news channel and the national flag "collectively upside down" at this time is a coincidence or a deliberate expression.

Some interpretations have quickly gained traction:

The power struggle at the highest levels has reached a fever pitch, with the "anti-Xi faction" taking preemptive action within the propaganda system;

Xi's core position is showing signs of weakening, and official media are using the "upside-down flag" as a way to express their stance or even issue a warning;

Some even link it to the so-called "celestial and personnel resonance," believing that the upside-down flag in CCTV news footage foreshadows an impending reversal of the power structure.

Furthermore, some believe this might be a prelude to even bigger moves:

If the image can be flipped over, will the actual power structure and the trajectory of the nation also be completely overturned?

Online reactions: From jokes to gross concerns

As the incident continued to escalate, various interpretations quickly emerged on overseas platforms and Chinese forums:

"The national flag is upside down, and they still say it's just a technical glitch? Who believes that!"

"Other channels are working normally, but the news channel is broadcasting the national flag and news upside down. This blatant bias is too obvious."

"Even the five-star red flag is being broadcast upside down; CCTV is risking its life to send a signal."

"They've gone this far in distorting the truth; can Xi Jinping still maintain his composure?"

Of course, some believe it could simply be a problem with the user's device or a flipping error during post-production video processing.

However, the problem lies in the fact that, in the current extremely sensitive political atmosphere, the visual impact of the "upside-down national flag" is so strong that any technical explanation seems somewhat weak.

Is this just a simple bug, or a shocking hint?

As of now, CCTV has not officially responded to or clarified this "upside-down incident"—including the upside-down national flag issue. This silence itself is seen by many as even more intriguing.

Historically, CCTV has experienced technical malfunctions, but broadcasting the national flag, presenters, and even a rocket upside down is extremely rare.

Was it a simple technical accident? Or was someone using a "malfunction" as a pretext to send a signal?

Was it a system error, or was someone deliberately showing the national flag upside down to the entire nation?

History often takes a turn in the details.

When CCTV News even broadcasts the Chinese Communist national flag upside down, does it mean something is truly changing?

What do you think? Is this an equipment malfunction, or a hidden prelude to a major upheaval in the CCP's political landscape?

Phuket plane-spotting at 8/5 RunwayCafe

 Photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA

Trump defeats the CCP during the Xi-Trump meeting, Lai Ching-te has risen in status

 Direct Translation

The Xi-Trump meeting: A major defeat for the CCP! Xi Jinping only managed to salvage one thing!

—Lai Ching-te's rise in status: Xi Jinping suffers a major defeat, Trump wins

Editor : Zhongkang / Source: Sanlih News / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0517/2384756.html / Image : Web Screenshot

Following the conclusion of the Trump-Xi meeting, attention is focused on the future development of the US-China-Taiwan situation. Lawyer Chen Chun-wei stated on the 16th that Xi Jinping's only certainty is his personal safety, but his ambition to seize Taiwan has suffered a major setback. He also noted that, based on President Trump's related remarks, President Lai Ching-te's status has clearly risen.

Chen Chun-wei wrote that after the Trump-Xi meeting, Trump's "shopping spree" was a resounding victory, and Xi Jinping's ambition to seize Taiwan suffered a major defeat. His only certainty is that he will not be assassinated. He offered four points of analysis.

Chen Chun-wei pointed out: 1. Trump's desired "shopping spree"—demanding China buy soybeans and Boeing aircraft—which China did: Trump wins. 2. Trump wanted China to express its stance on Iran, which Xi Jinping complied with, supporting the prohibition of nuclear weapons and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz: Trump wins.

Chen Chun-wei mentioned that, thirdly, Xi Jinping wanted to make a statement regarding Taiwan, but Trump himself said nothing, only stating, "I want to talk to the rulers of Taiwan." Lai Ching-te's position has risen, and Secretary of State Rubio stated that "the U.S. position has not changed." Therefore, the $1.25 trillion arms purchase proceeded as planned: Trump and Taiwan won, and Xi Jinping lost big.

Chen Chun-wei emphasized that, fourthly, Xi Jinping fears becoming the next leader to be beheaded, and is eager to meet with Trump, while simultaneously purging his own Communist Party subordinates. Currently, it seems they are maintaining a stalemate, with Xi's only advantage being his personal safety.

The Trump-Xi meeting ended without an agreement or a communiqué

 Direct Translation

The Trump-Xi meeting ended without an agreement or a communiqué! Beijing only said nine words

Editor: Fang Xun / Source: United Daily News / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0517/2384587.html

Trump's whirlwind trip to Beijing has concluded, with both the White House and the Chinese Foreign Ministry summarizing the itinerary. International media and the Chinese public are debating who won and who lost, with some saying it was a "win-win situation for both China and the US, each getting what they need," others saying "South Korea wins face, America wins substance," and still others saying China "won twice." Beyond these various opinions, think tank members in Beijing have privately summarized three key outcomes:

The two sides did not sign a trade agreement or issue a joint communiqué

Why are there so many interpretations? First, this Trump-Xi summit broke with convention in many ways. There was no signing of investment and trade agreements witnessed by Trump and Xi, no joint communiqué, and even the previously rumoured gift list changed. The simplest proof is that after Wang Yi summarized Trump's visit, an AI search for "major achievements of China during Trump's visit to Beijing" returned the answer: "Currently, there is no clear information showing that China achieved specific substantive results during Trump's visit to Beijing."

The three key outcomes summarized by Beijing think tank members can be described in three sets of nine characters: "soft landing, new framework, and major hardcore."

Without quoting the White House's celebratory pronouncements or mentioning Wang Yi's praise, and using more straightforward language, "soft landing" refers to the truce agreement, without a written document, that has emerged from the various conflicts between the U.S. and China since Trump's second term, such as the tariff war, the chip war, the rare earth war, the technology war, and the currency war. In other words, at the height of the tariff war, tariffs on Chinese goods reached 145%, but with China's exports surging by 11.9% in the first quarter of this year, the war could no longer continue, necessitating a truce.

Of course, there are differing opinions, arguing that some conflicts will cease while others may continue, such as the AI ​​war. Some have also noted that Trump's delegation of business leaders included those selling chips, electric vehicles, and mobile phones, but none representing the field of artificial intelligence. The response is that this turning point signifies a halt to the various conflicts between the U.S. and China, ushering in a soft landing phase that could last for several months.

As for the "new framework," the outside world is already very familiar with it; it is the "constructive strategic and stable relationship between the US and China" that China has been heavily promoting. When handling international relations, the CCP's first step is to define the relationship. The US and China already had a "new type of great power relationship," and now a new definition is being proposed.

This definition, elevated to the highest level, is a strategic relationship. This time, the term "strategic relationship" is further defined by two qualifiers: constructive and stable. Beyond the official interpretation, this primarily means two things: first, a shift away from emphasizing the balance between competition and cooperation; and second, a focus on risk management.

While "strategic relationship" may seem like a cliché, interpreting it within a new framework reveals new meaning. In the official CCP language, it means defining a strategic relationship and providing strategic guidance. This new framework not only outlines the general direction of future US-China relations but also defines its general scope. If circumstances change slightly, China will assert that the two heads of state have already proposed strategic guidance, and actions must adhere to this guidance without deviation. This essentially creates a protective shield for U.S.-China relations.

Finally, let's look at the "big core." "Hardcore" is a term directly translated from English and is also a popular internet slang term. Originally referring to something extreme, powerful, or challenging, it now refers to problems with extremely high barriers to entry and immense difficulty. In the case of Trump's visit to Beijing and the Trump-Xi meeting, the Taiwan issue was the biggest "hardcore" problem.

Before the Trump-Xi meeting, unusually, Trump publicly stated that he would discuss the Taiwan issue and arms sales with Xi, while Beijing hinted that the Taiwan issue would not be discussed, arguing that traditionally, international leaders' summits do not substantively discuss Taiwan due to sovereignty restrictions. However, at the Trump-Xi meeting, the situation reversed. Xi proactively brought up the Taiwan issue, while Trump avoided a direct response, choosing to speak only aboard Air Force One.

Reports indicate that during the Xi-Trump meeting, Xi Jinping began by mentioning some setbacks in Sino-U.S. relations, then discussed his views on Sino-U.S. issues, stating the need to find a way to coexist. This naturally led to the proposal of a new strategic framework: a "constructive strategic and stable relationship between China and the U.S." This framework explains four aspects: "cooperation as the main focus, competition within limits, differences manageable, and peace achievable." The issue of peace then led to the Taiwan issue. Xi Jinping's official remarks at the summit, released by the Chinese Communist Party's official media in the form of a breaking news report, were unprecedented in both content and format. Trump's subsequent response upon returning to the U.S. may also foreshadow a significant turning point.

Why Shenzhen is becoming a "city of leftover women"

 Direct Translation

A dangerous "city of leftover women" has emerged in China! Dozens of women are reportedly hunting down one man

- Nine women vying for one man: A surreal scene unfolds in Shenzhen

Reporter : Wang Duruo / Editor: Fang Xun / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0517/2384632.html / Image : Web Screenshot

Shenzhen, once touted as a "money-making paradise," is increasingly resembling a "city of leftover women."

Recent matchmaking events in Shenzhen have been almost entirely attended by women. Numerous highly educated, high-income, and attractive white-collar women filled the venues, while men were few and far between. One matchmaker even revealed that a man with a house and a car in Shenzhen could be surrounded by dozens of women vying for his attention.

While it appears to be a case of "women pursuing men," the underlying issue is a large-scale withdrawal of ordinary men from the marriage market in Shenzhen.

The problem is not simply that "women have high standards," but rather that ordinary men are finding it increasingly difficult to bear the cost of living in Shenzhen. The layers of housing prices, cars, dowries, education, social obligations, and other expenses pile up, making marriage in Shenzhen almost a "suicidal charge" for ordinary men without family support or high-paying jobs.

Many men do not want to get married; they are afraid to. A widely circulated saying hits the nail on the head: "It's not that I don't want to marry her, it's that I don't want her to suffer with me." Marriage today is no longer just about love; it is more like an asset assessment:

No house, out of the running; no car, points deducted; low income, eliminated; little savings, deemed "no future."

As a result, many ordinary men choose to leave Shenzhen, return to their hometowns, or even simply give up. On the other hand, a large number of highly educated women remain in Shenzhen. The problem is that the more outstanding a woman is, the fewer men meet the "upward compatibility" criteria.

This ultimately creates an absurd situation: ordinary men feel "unworthy of marriage"; high-achieving men have a wide range of choices; and many middle-class women are stuck in a "neither here nor there" situation.

Now, the Shenzhen dating market is even clearly shifting towards a "men's market." Many women over 30 are suddenly finding that education and income are not as advantageous as they imagined. With the economic downturn, the fantasy of "a domineering CEO falling in love with me" is being shattered by reality.

Even more dangerous is the growing societal narrative that "a man without money doesn't deserve to marry." This is destroying the lives of countless ordinary men. More and more people are becoming silent, refusing to date, marry, or have children.

Shenzhen is, in fact, just a microcosm of major Chinese cities. When marriage increasingly resembles resource matching, and love becomes more like cost calculation, the ultimate result is: men are increasingly hesitant to marry, women are finding it increasingly difficult to find partners, and the entire society is trapped in a cycle of low desire.

The so-called "city of leftover women" may not truly be about women, but rather about the increasing unaffordability of marriage for ordinary people.

Trump : Taiwan issue discussed all night, prefers de-escalation

 Direct Translation

Trump reveals most sensitive content of his Trump-Xi meeting: Taiwan issue discussed all night

Editor : Zhongkang / Source: Yiping News Network / https://www.aboluowang.com/2026/0516/2384447.html

A Fox News reporter asked Trump, "Xi Jinping emphasized that Taiwan is the most important issue in US-China relations. He said that if handled well, the two countries can maintain overall stability; if handled poorly, it could lead to clashes or even conflict, pushing U.S.-China relations to a very dangerous situation. This sounded like a threat. Did he say this during the closed-door Trump-Xi meeting?"

Trump: "No, no, no, absolutely not. But it has always been their most important issue. It's not about taking over; they just don't want to see this place (referring to Taiwan), called a place, because nobody knows how to define it, but they don't want to see it independent. They don't want to do that. I think they might do something very harsh, and then they'll be treated harshly, and bad things will happen."

"So it's not like that. By the way, we talked about this all night last night (referring to the state dinner). I think I know more about Taiwan now than I do about almost every other country."

Did Xi Jinping lead the Trump-Xi meeting?

Trump: "I've known Xi Jinping for 11 or 12 years, and Taiwan has always been the most important thing to him. Now that I'm here (referring to President Trump's term), when I'm here, I don't think they'll do anything; but when I'm not here, I think they might, frankly.

"I'm not sure they'll do anything while maintaining the status quo, but there are people over there (referring to Taiwan) who want independence. When you go for independence, you know, going for independence is a dangerous thing. They go for independence, which is like entering a war, and they think the United States will support them."

Trump warns Taiwan against independence: Shocking interview fully revealed

"I want to see the status quo, I'm telling you, I'm going to let you in: I want to see all the people who make chips in Taiwan come to the United States, because frankly, I think that's the best thing you can do, because it's a very intense situation. No doubt about it. As you know, we already have a lot of chip companies coming from Taiwan to the United States, and we expect to control 40% to 50% of the global chip industry by the end of my term. And I think it should be more. I think all those chip companies, if they're smart, will start going to Arizona and where they're building factories, and that will solve your problem." "After the Trump-Xi meeting, should Taiwanese people feel safer or more dangerous?

Trump: "Neutral. There's no change in U.S.-Taiwan policy. I would say I don't want to see anyone heading towards independence, and you know, we'd have to fly 9,500 miles to fight a war. I don't want that. I want them to calm down. I want China to calm down."

Will you approve arms sales to Taiwan?

Trump: "I haven't approved it yet. We'll see what happens. I might do it, or I might not. But we don't want a war. If we maintain the status quo, I think China will accept it. But we don't want someone saying, 'Let's go towards independence because the United States supports us.'"

Does Xi Jinping like it when you don't approve arms sales?

Trump: “I’d say ‘like’ might be too strong a word because he thinks I can just sign it and get it done, unlike Biden who can’t sign it. I’m putting it on hold for now, it depends on China. It’s a great bargaining chip for us, honestly, it’s a lot of weapons, $14 billion, a lot of weapons. But you know, statistically speaking, China is a very powerful country, and that’s a very small island.”

“You think about it, they’re only 59 miles away, 59 miles, and we’re 9,500 miles away. It’s a bit of a difficult problem.”

“That being said, if you look at Taiwan’s history, Taiwan has developed into what it is today because some of our presidents didn’t know what they were doing. Because if they were to import chips…” "Imposing tariffs won't make them (the chip industry) leave. It's all about Intel and our chip companies; they stole our chip industry. I've said this for years: they stole our chips. If we had a president in the past who said, 'We will impose a 100% tariff on chips; you can leave, you can build factories in Taiwan, but when you sell them back to the U.S., we will impose a 100% or 200% tariff,' we would never have lost our chip industry. We lost our chip industry, and now they're all coming back."

"I want to emphasize that it would be very wise for Taiwan to de-escalate the situation slightly, and it would also be very wise for China to de-escalate the situation slightly. Both sides should remain calm."

Hotel Review XI : Miracle Suvarnabhumi Airport Hotel

 Review, photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA

I am very happy to stay in Miracle Suvarnabhumi Airport Hotel again. I can spot the airport, aircraft and sun rising clearly from the toilet window of my room.