French "Marianne" weekly website reported on January 30 that Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning accused the United States of "triggering the crisis in Ukraine" and asked Washington to stop sending heavy weapons to Kyiv. The statement contradicted the "neutral" stance taken by Chinese President Xi Jinping since Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
A report on the international edition of the weekly's website states: "Are we witnessing the beginning of a global conflict? For the first time since the start of the war in Ukraine, China has taken a stance in favor of Russia". At a regular press conference held in Beijing on Monday, 30 January, CCP Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning accused the United States of "triggering the crisis in Ukraine" and supplying heavy weapons to Kyiv, while "this is the main factor for fueling the crisis in Ukraine."
The report quoted the US Bloomberg channel as recalling that on 24 January 2023, the US government criticized Chinese listed companies for assisting Russia militarily and economically. According to Beijing's rebuttal, this is baseless blackmail and a victim of "blackmail". CCP Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning accused Washington of "spreading paranoia" in response to reporters' remarks. She said CCP would "never add fuel to the flames" and assured that China "will contribute less to crises".
The report went on to write that Chinese companies' support for Russia includes non-lethal military and economic assistance, which according to Bloomberg does not violate the sanctions imposed by the United States and its allies after Russia invaded Ukraine.
The French weekly magazine Marianne concludes by highlighting that this unprecedented change in tone comes just days before US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken's visit to Beijing next Sunday and Monday. So far, Xi Jinping has taken a neutral stance toward Putin. Whether it was mid-September, at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (OCS) summit, when Beijing expressed concern to its Russian counterparts about the war in Ukraine; Spill out."
According to previous reports from Reuters, the U.S. State Department and the Treasury Department simultaneously imposed sanctions on individuals and entities related to the Russian Wagner Group on the 26th, and imposed sanctions on Changsha Tianyi Space Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Changsha Tianyi Space Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. "Tianyi") is also included in the sanctions list because the company "provided assistance to the Russian Wagner Group" in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
In response to this, Tianyi said in response to a reporter from the Global Times on the 29th that Tianyi and its subsidiaries have no business dealings with Russia's Terra Tech Company and Wagner Group, and that Tianyi's products and services are used in civil and commercial matters. purposes, not involving any military use. At the same time, Tianyi is actively communicating with all parties, trying its best to ensure open, fair and just treatment, and safeguarding its legitimate rights and interests through legal means.
Hell real estate is on fire, Hu's mother is raped by the Internet
Let's focus on the latest situation of the Hu Xinyu case. After the case of Hu Xinyu was concluded by the authorities, Hu's mother and other family members of Xinyu were subjected to cyber violence by many people. Netizens in CCP China accused Hu's mother of not caring about the child's mental health, creating public opinion to pressure the school to claim compensation from the police, and using Douyin to divert people for profit, etc.
These so-called accusations are actually groundless. As a mother, how can you not care about your children? I don't know what kind of psychology the people who say this say.
As for the accusation that Mama Hu created public opinion to put pressure on the school, this point of accusation is even more suspected of taking sides. After Hu Xinyu disappeared, the family members watched the school's surveillance and found that the video of Hu Xinyu's disappearance had been deleted. Is it not normal for family members to create public opinion and pressure when the school does not give any explanation?
As for claiming compensation from the police and using Douyin to divert people for profit, this is even more bloody. If the Hu family is for money, when the school proposes to give 2 million privately, the Hu family will not refuse. Only those who grew up drinking the CCP's wolf milk will have this kind of thinking.
In fact, those who accused Hu's mother and Xinyu's other family members were roughly divided into three groups. Part of it is to believe the conclusion of the Jiangxi authorities, the second part is to choose to stand in line and take advantage of the popularity to gain traffic, and the other part is to be deliberately bad.
But no matter what kind of person they are, if they criticize the Hu family at this time, they can't get rid of the suspicion of adding insult to injury. If he turned a blind eye to the facts and sprayed blood, then this person can only be said to be quite vicious.
Browsing Weibo this morning (3rd), I saw a post, "Recently, the real estate in hell is going to be on fire." When I first saw this post, I thought it was a netizen making up jokes, and I wondered, how could there be real estate in hell?
But after contacting Hu Xinyu's case, I realized that this netizen was expressing a kind of anger. He is cursing all the people who killed Hu Xinyu, and the perpetrators who turned the deer into a horse in order to cover up the shady scene to go to hell early.
News (19)
Where are Hu Xinyu's glasses? The granary guard showed up
Image of the granary guard : Video Screenshot
Yesterday I said that after the joint press conference of Jiangxi's three-level police, the voices questioning Hu Xinyu's case on the Internet should disappear. Browsing various social platforms this morning (3rd), it turns out that there are very few doubting voices, but there are still brave netizens who continue to question.
Regarding people's various questions, there are repetitions of previous questions and new doubts. For example, Zhiyuan Middle School is a boarding school with intensive surveillance cameras, how did Hu Xinyu leave the school without being caught by the cameras, etc.
Attention everyone, Jiangxi police have responded to many questions raised by people. Even if it doesn't make sense, it's a response. But where did Hu Xinyu's glasses go? The official did not mention it; and there is another key point that did not respond to the issue of surveillance cameras.
Hu Xinyu is highly myopic, and he wears a pair of glasses. The authorities found the recording pen at the scene, and in order to find the meal card, they could send an excavator to dig a certain depth. If Hu Xinyu hanged himself, if the glasses were not on the bridge of his nose, they would have fallen near the scene.
However, the authorities did not mention Hu Xinyu's glasses. Could it be that they were not there? It is very difficult for people with high myopia to move without glasses. If there are no glasses on the scene, where do the glasses go? Unless this is not the first scene.
Let alone the surveillance video. After Hu Xinyu's disappearance, the family members had read the school's monitoring logs and questioned that the monitoring logs were deleted at critical times. The Shangrao police later stated that they had invited Hangzhou "Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd. technicians" to the scene to check the equipment several times. And issued a situation report on December 16, "proving that the hard disk video recorder in the school does not have a functional module for manually deleting logs and recordings."
The Shangrao police also stated that the professional technicians of the equipment manufacturer further explained, "equipment logs and video storage, security protection principles, confirmed that there is no manufacturer's equipment and technical support that cannot be deleted and modified" and so on.
However, on 6 January, "China News Weekly" reported that "the actual situation is that Hikvision has not made an appraisal conclusion on whether the video was deleted or not."
Hikvision never made that conclusion. But this time, Jiangxi's third-level police deliberately evaded this point, and did not dare to explain the problem of the surveillance video.
In addition, the China Grain Depot also has 360-degree surveillance cameras, and Hu Xinyu even avoided the surveillance here.
What is even more incredible is that no one found out that it had been suspended for more than 100 days, and the people in the China Grain Storage said that they had "routine inspections".
In CCTV's news report, Liu Guiquan, the warehouse guard who "first discovered" Hu Xinyu's body, made an appearance. He turned his back to the camera and said that during the "routine inspection" of the grain depot, he wanted to cut a piece of moso bamboo to dry clothes, but his dog ran to the woods deep in the steep slope. After chasing it, I saw "something like rain pants hanging up, look carefully, there are children's shoes under it".
News (20)
"Routine inspection" dogs feel abnormal, throwing corpses during the Chinese New Year?
[CCTV screen] On January 28, (I) came over for inspection, and I brought a hatchet. By the way, I cut a piece of moso bamboo to dry the quilt, it is like this.
Voiceover: Liu Guiquan told the reporter that he didn't notice anything unusual when he first arrived here. Because his dog ran to the woods deep in the steep slope that day, he chased it and saw the scene.
Liu Guiquan: I just walked to the place where Maozhu was, and saw a (object) like rain pants hanging, and hung it to that place. I took a closer look and saw the kid's shoes underneath.
*******************
Everyone pay attention, Liu Guiquan said that it was a routine inspection on 28 January, and it was the dog who discovered the situation and ran to the hanging place of the corpse. After Liu Guiquan chased him, he found a dead body hanging there.
I'm a little unclear here, how often do the "routine inspections" of China's grain storage depots take place? It was not mentioned in the CCTV report. I don't know if they forgot to ask, or they avoided it on purpose.
If it is on a daily basis, once a day or once every two days? Or three days, five days, or once a week? Or once every 10 days, once every half a month. If the interval is too long, it can't be called "routine inspection", right?
Assuming a half-monthly inspection, at least 7 inspections in 106 days; if it is inspected once in 10 days, at least 10 inspections in 106 days; if it is inspected once a week, at least 15 inspections in 106 days.
So the question is, why the dog didn't notice the abnormality during the frequent inspections? Well-known forensic doctor Hu Zhiqiang made it very clear that it is impossible to hang a body on a tree for 105 days. Otherwise, either the rope will rot, or the body will fall apart.
Judging from the photos leaked on the Internet and the statements of the authorities, the shoelaces did not rot, and the remains did not fall apart. As for the fact that the shoelaces are not rotten, the authorities' explanation can only become a point of complaint.
Based on these circumstances, we deduce that the greatest possibility is that shortly before Liu Guiquan's routine inspection on 28 January, the body was quietly hung up. Only such a situation can explain the fact that the dog did not smell anything abnormal before. If the dog's nose is fine, it must be because there was no previous body. In other words, the scene where the body was found was not the first scene.
We further speculate that January 28 is the seventh day of the Lunar New Year, which is also a Saturday. Will the janitor come round every Saturday? And it happened that the situation was discovered during the inspection on January 28.
If this is the case, then the time when the corpse was hung up should be the period after the inspection on January 21 and before the inspection on January 28. January 21st is the New Year's Eve, and every household is busy celebrating the New Year, setting off firecrackers, watching TV and so on.
Could it be that during this Chinese New Year period, someone took advantage of people's distraction and secretly hung the "skeleton" on it? If this is the case, I think you can check the surveillance video of the grain depot. This surveillance video is not only a 360-degree surveillance without dead angles, but also the background network is directly connected to the provincial grain depot and the Beijing General Monitoring Center, and the data can be stored for at least one month.
If you consult the surveillance video, the answer should be unravelable. It's just that the authorities are covering it up, and it's impossible to release the video. I hope that people with conscience who know the truth will expose this video in the future, and then all the villains who participated in the evil will surface.
News (21)
The shoelaces can bear 1.5 tons? Deduction of Hu Xinyu hanging himself
Of course, "throwing corpses during the Chinese New Year" is just my speculation, not necessarily true. But such speculation seems to explain why shoelaces can hang young people with a height of 173 cm.
If Hu Xinyu hadn't been hung up by someone after his death, or if he had put it on by himself, the shoelaces would never have been able to withstand the huge impact.
At the Jiangxi third-level police press conference, the investigation results reported by the authorities were. On the north side of the central site is an east-west wall, and on the inner wall of the wall grows a tree with a diameter of 11 cm that grows obliquely inward.
According to the report, Hu Xinyu was suspended on the raised part of the tree trunk, the suspension point was 4.5 meters from the ground, and the vertical distance from the top of the wall was 0.61 meters. Hu Xinyu's drooping toes are 1.47 meters from the ground.
According to the height of Hu Xinyu's toes from the ground, and according to the released on-site investigation video, it can be known that when Hu Xinyu "hanged himself", there was no stool or other objects under his feet. In other words, he did not step on any object to hang himself.
We all know that shoelaces are very soft. Because of this, I wonder how did Hu Xinyu hang his shoelaces on the tree? After hanging on the tree, how did he tie it into a knot? Did he climb a tree? Did he end up getting his head into the sleeve?
Assuming all these are true, then when his body leaves the tree, the momentum plus his weight, for the shoelace, can be described as "a close call".
According to the data reported by the Jiangxi police, Dr. Zhang Tianliang, a professor at Feitian University and a well-known self-media person, calculated and analyzed based on mathematical formulas and the law of energy conservation. If Hu Xinyu hanged himself, the average force on the shoelaces would be Hu Xinyu. 30 times its body weight.
Hu Xinyu's height is 173 centimeters, plus the distance from his toes to the ground is 1.47 meters, the total length is 3.2 meters. It can be deduced from this that the length of the noose is at least 1.3 meters. If the part around the trunk is added, the length of the noose is about 1.5 meters.
Zhang Tianliang pointed out that according to the law of energy conservation, jumping from a height of 1.5 meters and hanging on a tree, this potential energy should be offset by the work done by the tension of the shoelaces. So calculated in this way, the average force of the shoelace is 1.5 tons.
The calculation formulas and data that you see now are the calculation and analysis process and the results obtained by Professor Zhang Tianliang.
According to Hu Xinyu's height estimation, under normal circumstances his weight is about 65 kg. Authorities say the shoelaces are made of polyester and have strong tension, "with a maximum weight of 85 kilograms under slow stretching."
However, even if it can bear Hu Xinyu's weight, can this shoelace bear the momentum of 30 times Hu Xinyu's weight? 1.5 tons is 1500 kilograms. Even if you have 10 shoelaces, I am afraid they will be broken long ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment