Research, editing : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA
News (4)
Burns
disclosed the information during a speech at
Georgia Tech's Sam Nunn School of International Affairs on 14 April 2022.
"By
early last fall we and our partners in the U.S. intelligence community had
begun to gather disturbing and detailed intelligence about Putin's plans for a
major new invasion of Ukraine," he said. "Neither Putin nor many of
those around him could imagine Russia as a major power without a deferential
Ukraine – a Ukraine whose external choices were controlled by the Kremlin.
"I
have learned over the years never to underestimate Putin's relentless
determination – especially on Ukraine. In early November, President [Joe] Biden
asked me to travel to Russia to convey directly to Putin and several of his
closest advisers the depth of our concern about his planning for war, and the
consequences for Russia for attempting to execute that plan.
"I
was troubled by what I heard. While it did not yet seem that he had made an
irreversible decision to invade Ukraine, Putin was defiantly leaning in that
direction – apparently convinced that his window was closing for shaping
Ukraine's orientation."
Burns
said Putin appeared certain the winter offered the right setting for the
invasion.
"He
seemed convinced that winter offered a favorable landscape with President
[Volodymyr] Zelenskyy and the Ukrainians unlikely, in his view, to mount
effective resistance, the Russian military capable of a quick, decisive victory
at minimal costs, our European allies distracted by their own politics … and
the Russian economy sanctions-proof by a war chest of foreign currency
reserves.
"When
he launched his war seven weeks ago, Putin was proven wrong on each of those
accounts."
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVWzer7TTP0&t=577s
News (31) to (35) / Source : The Expose / https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/03/evidence-confirms-moderna-created-covid-19/
News (31)
They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in the covid virus in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.
However, they failed to make the obvious deduction there from. Had they made said obvious deduction I fear that might have been the last scientific deduction they ever got published!
They decided to investigate the RNA sequence for the Furin cleavage site in the covi spike protein to see if it occurred anywhere else in nature. .
Fortunately the NCBI/NIH have produced the wonderful BLAST database which catalogues every gene sequence in nature known to man and every synthetic patented gene sequence known to the patent office.
The researchers chose the Furin Cleavage sequence because it is the only continuous gene letter sequence (nucleotide sequence) in covid with more than 3 nucleotides, that differs from the respective letters in its closest natural relative the Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 (all other differences are 3 letters or less long). So it was by far the best candidate for determining whether or not SARS-CoV-2 was man made.
The reader might consider it more likely that a Furin Cleavage Site would appear in the Sun than in the Daily Mail. But this cleavage refers to the separation of spike from virus rather than pillow from pillow.
Furthermore the Furin Cleavage Site is key to the pathogenicity of covid. So if there was to be some man made gain of function included in the virus, this is where one might expect to find it.
The Amino Acid sequence of the Furin Cleavage Site is PRRA (Proline Argenine Argenine Alanine). Each Amino Acid is coded for by a Codon, consisting of 3 nucleotides (genetic sequence letters). So all the differences in the genetic code between Covid-19 and RaTG13 are at most one Codon long, one amino acid long, other than the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which is…
CCT CGG CGG GCA
The complimentary sequence (the opposing DNA strand of the double helix is (GGAGCCGCCCGT) because C binds with G and A binds with T
The reverse compliment (the same thing written backwards) is therefore TGCCCGCCGAGG
The researchers did a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) alignment search (which means they search for the gene sequence, the reverse gene sequence, the complimentary gene sequence and the reverse complimentary gene sequence) through every gene sequence in nature known to man for CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG which is the 19 nucleotide sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which also appears in Covid-19, and which is found actually in the reverse compliment form CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG patented by Moderna.
Their search results can be found here.
Table 1 shows that it does exist in the 5 US patents cited below…
US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9149506B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc
2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618953P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-05-22 Publication of US20140141067A1
2015-10-06 Publication of US9149506B2
2015-10-06 Application granted
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed
US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9216205B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc
2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618873P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-04-24 Publication of US20140113960A1
2015-12-22 Publication of US9216205B2
2015-12-22 Application granted
US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9255129B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc
2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-05-22 Publication of US20140141068A1
2016-02-09 Application granted
2016-02-09 Publication of US9255129B2
US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9301993B2/en
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc
2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618957P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-04-17 Publication of US20140107189A1
2016-04-05 Application granted
2016-04-05 Publication of US9301993B2
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed
US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en
InventorsStephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc
2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc
2016-06-02 Publication of US20160152678A1
2017-03-07 Publication of US9587003B2
2017-03-07 Application granted
So Moderna first applied for a patent for the 19 nucleotide sequence in 2013 on 16 December. Perhaps December25 would have been more appropriate since it was destined to become the Crown of Thorns of Mathew27, Mark15 and John19
Table2: Shows that the sequence occurs in SARS-CoV-2 from nucleotide 23601 to 23619.
Table3: Shows that this gene sequence does not exist in nature (but 14 nucleotide parts of it do).
I decided to check their work. Yes. I fact checked them (I will send an invoice to the globalists). This turned out to be a bit of an epic journey. The Google patent page for US9587003B2 does not contain the gene sequence. The pdf of the patent does not contain the gene sequence and is not searchable from pages 101-304. But it does have a link to a lengthy ‘Sequence Listing” section which link one cannot copy. So I manually transcribed it in my fair hand – http://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=docDetail&DocID=US09587003B2
From that page you can enter the Sequence ID quoted in the paper as 11652 and get to https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652 which has the following at Nucleotides 2751-2733 reading backwards…
gccctgatca ccatcatggc ccagatcggc agctacgtgc ccgccgagga ggccaccatc 2760
CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG patented by Moderna is the reverse compliment of CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG, the 19 nucleotide sequence which appears in SARS-CoV-2 DNA from nucleotide 23601-23619 (which would therefore be covered by their patent).
Likewise you can search for the sequence in US9149506B2 by going to https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09149506B2&seqID=11652, whereupon you will find the same thing again
gccctgatca ccatcatggc ccagatcggc agctacgtgc ccgccgagga ggccaccatc 2760
I then searched the gene sequence of Wuhan Hu1 (alpha) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_045512 and found
23581 ttatcagact cagactaatt ctcctcggcg ggcacgtagt gtagctagtc aatccatcat from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_045512
Which has the 19 nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG from 23601-23619 is described in table 3.
I then ran my own non aligned blast search of all patented gene sequences for the reverse compliment directly (or perhaps for a back handed compliment) and got the same results as the researchers
It is the same for the other 3 U.S. patents.
So I can confirm, and the reader can confirm using the links above, that Moderna did apply for a Patent not only on the reverse compliment of the 12 nucleotide Furin Cleavage Site in Covid-19 but actually on the 19 nucleotide sequence containing it as described above.
Furthermore they did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2:as well.
So Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid19 its infectivity to humans by patented gain of function research as early as 2013, 6 years before the Wuhan outbreak took place. Not 3 as reported in the Mail and virally elsewhere..
So now we look at the chances of this occurring naturally. The paper calculates the probability of this particular 19 nucleotide sequence occurring randomly in a 30,000 nucleotide virus as
(30,000-18) x (1/4)19 = 1.09 x 10-7
Which is correct because there are 30,000-18 places to start the sequence given that it needs a further 18 more letters to complete it. But there are actually 29,904 nucleotides in Wuhan HU1 (alpha). So a more accurate calculation would be
(29,904-18) x (1/4)19 = 1.087 x 10-7
Then they calculate the chances that the 19 nucleotide sequence occurs in the patented library of 24,712 sequences with a mean length of 3300 nucleotides. But that calculation is irrelevant because the sequence did not randomly appear in 5 Moderna Patent applications. The sequence was known to code for a Furin Cleavage Site, which is known to provide gain of function to Coronaviruses.
It was put there deliberately and patented due to its infecting power in humans, which we shall see, later in the article, results from the normal viral Arginine (R) codon AGA (used in 45% of viral Arginine codons) being replaced by the human Arginine codon CGG (used in 0% of viral Arginine codons) in the furin cleavage site.
All we are tying to work out here is what the chances are of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna turning up in Covid-19 through natural causes, the natural mutations of Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 or some other virus.
The nucleotides form Codons which are triplets. So there are 64 possible triplets of the 4 DNA nucleotides ACGT (4x4x4 = 64). But all triplets do occur. 61 code for 20 amino acids redundantly and 3 are stop codons which tell the ribosome to stop making the protein.
But things are not this simple because the Furin cleavage site appears in the spike protein where it needs to be and the spike protein only has 1273×3 = 3819 nucleotides. The chances of the 19 nucleotide Furin Cleavage sequence appearing in the spike protein are
(3,819-18) x (1/4)19 = 1.389 x 10-8
Or 1 in 72 million. So those would be the chances that one particular variant, say the first covi variant, had the 19 nucleotide sequence in the right place (the spike) and it did. So certainly by the balance of probabilities, and certainly beyond a reasonable doubt (1 in 72 million being an unreasonable doubt) Moderna made SARS-CoV-2.
News (32)
100% Biochemical proof that SARS-CoV-2 was artificial
The Double CGG Codon used in the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage site does not occur in any other Furin cleavage site in any other virus in nature. Furin cleavage sites do occur in other viruses but NOT at all in other betacoronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2 and NOT at all with the double CGG codon.
Arginine (R), can be encoded by any of the 6 triplets: AGG, AGA, CGA, CGC, CGG, CGT. In Covid-19, the furin site (PRRA), has 12 nucleotides (3 x 4). In covid, the RR doublet of the furin site is encoded by CGG-CGG.
Two Biochemists Prof Antonio R. Romeu and Assistant Prof Enric Ollé analysed the RR doublet from a large sample of furin cleavage sites of several kinds of viruses. They found that there were no RR doublets encoded by the CGG-CGG codons in any virus in nature. They observed that the AGA triplet was the majority codon involved in these viral RR doublets.
In all genetic recombination (where a part of one genome merges with another genome), the donor code is passed to the acceptor but there is simply NO KNOWN VIRUS with a Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Site (having the CGG-CGG codon pair) that exists to donate a Moderna Specific furin cleavage site to Covid19. So the only way that sequence could get into SARS-CoV-2 is from Moderna. Moderna was the donor. Nature was not. Case closed.. but it gets worse.
The Spanish Profs decided to analyse the arginine codon usage in every single protein in Covid-19. The found the following…
AGG (13%)
AGA (45%)
CGA (5%)
CGC (10%)
CGG (3%)
CGT (24%).
So the AGA codon triplet was the majority, and interestingly, CGG was the minority codon for Arginine in the virus.
But it gets worse still.
In the specific case of S protein, of the 42 Arginines (R) it has, 20 are encoded by AGA, and only 2 by CGG. These 2 of course, are the two in the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Site.
So the only Arginine in the spike protein that is encoded a la Moderna are in the Furin Cleavage site. The other 40 instances do not use CGG at all.
They then go on to comment that each individual species in nature has its own codon preferences. Obviously viruses like AGA, and do not like CGG at all, in nature.
But guess which species does use CGG for Arginine more than the other 5 competing codons – yes its jolly old homo sapiens. Our coding preferences for Arginine are
AGG (20%)
AGA (20%)
CGA (11%)
CGC (19%)
CGG (21%)
CGT (9%).
So the CGG codon in the furin cleavage site WILL have come about through Chimeric (human animal combination) gain of function research.
News (33)
It is suspected somebody other than Moderna made SARS-CoV-2 using the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Site
“New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles and aerosols containing “novel chimeric spike proteins” of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China. They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to fund the work.
Papers, confirmed as genuine by a former member of the Trump administration, show they were hoping to introduce “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells.
When COVID-19 was first genetically sequenced, scientists were puzzled about how the virus had evolved such a human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site on the spike protein, which is the reason it is so infectious.” – the Telegraph
I can see all of the great journalists at the Daily Mail and the Telegraph (not to mention scientists around the world) doing all of this research into COVID-19 and reaching the inevitable logical conclusion that there was either an accidental or a deliberate lab leak and then having to word their conclusions in such a way as to label that strong probablity as a weak possibility.
But here above we have proved it as a fact (since the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Sequence CGG codon does not occur in any furin cleavage site in any natural virus and therefore it cannot have been the result of natural genetic recombination. So it has to be the result of man made genetic insertion.
In theory a further party involved with the NAIAD or the NIH could have used the furin cleavage site patented by Moderna and made Covid19 themselves. This would not have broken any patent of Moderna. The Furin cleavage site itself is not patentable having been known since at least 2004
US7223390B2: Insertion of furin protease cleavage sites in membrane proteins and uses thereof
2004-05-07 Application filed by Research Development Foundation
2004-11-11 Publication of US20040224391A1
2007-05-29 Application granted
Although Moderna could actually have patented the Moderna Specific (CGG for AGA) encoding of the furin cleavage site which was is not known in nature even today (if we accept that SARS-CoV-2 is man made).
But given that the lab leak (deliberate or accidental) came from Wuhan, and given the Chinese cover up and given the Fauci denials exposed by Senator Rand Paul, and given the NIH, NIAID cover ups and the US Intelligence services cover up, when their 3 month long report into the origin of Covid-19 ordered by presidential impersonator Biden yielded nothing, and given the relationships between the NIAID, the NIH, the WIV, the EcoHealth Alliance, the University of North Carolina and Moderna, I cannot see any room for anyone else.
Furthermore the entire unholy cabal of bad actors started developing the Moderna Vaccine before the pandemic struck – https://www.infowars.com/posts/must-watch-nih-claimed-joint-ownership-of-moderna-mrna-vaccine-began-development-weeks-ahead-of-pandemic/
But things are not as simple as that because nature has had certainly 100,000 years to make human viruses and it never once put a Moderna specific (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site into anything, nor did it put the 19 nucleotide sequence in anything before.
Yet within 6 years of Moderna patenting it, we find it in Covid-19 in circumstances where Moderna is working with that virus. So just there the probability is not 100,000 to 6 or 16,666 to 1 that Moderna is responsible rather than nature. No it is 100% because nature has not done it. It never has and there is no evidence that it ever will.
News (34)
It is man that mixes up human and viral Arginine codons not nature
Pro Luc Montagnier spent the last years of his life proving that SARS-CoV-2 was man made and containing much of the HIV1 genetic code
Prof Luc Montagnier, before he died on 8 February 2022, did a total assassination of the concept that SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally by showing that it had massive equivalence to HIV. The diagram below shows a 275 nucleotide region of SARS-CoV-2 which has 200 nucleotides from HIV/SIV (Simian ImmunoVirus) in it. Remember there are 61 codons specifying 20 amino acids. So one can say the same thing in on average 3 different ways with codons.
You can download a pdf of his study here and the supplementary materials here. It is very technical. He wonthe Nobel prize for discovering the HIV virus. So if anyone would know if SARS-CoV-2 had been boosted with HIV, it would be him. He pointed out that SARS-CoV-2 was man made early in the pandemic and was himself assassinated by the press and the fact checkers as a result. Every single fact checker who attacked him was wrong.
There was no scientific basis to any of their fact checking. These outfits are not fact checkers at all of course. They are globalist disinformation agencies, sons of Goebbels, fact checkers and science deniers. They are about as trustworthy as an American election. I can check a fact for myself thank you very much. I don’t need a brainwashed woke madrassa student telling me their opinion about a subject that they never studied at University.
Since we have proven beyond a reasonable doubt (beyond a 1 in 72 million doubt statically and with 100% certainly biochemically from the Moderna Specific Furin Cleavage Site) that Moderna made Covid-19. And since Moderna and Fauci have not admitted to having made it and have in fact covered up evidence to that effect, it may be the case that they are hiding sosomething else as well.
Because the only two theories now left are the accidental lab leak theory and the deliberate lab leak theory. I mean the vast majority of political leaks are not accidents. They are deliberate strategies to provide advantage to the leaker or his paymaster. It is well known in the IT industry that viruses appear when antivirus sales are needed. Why would things be any different with human viruses, now that they can be man made too? Especially when you consider the massive role of Bill Gates and his foundation and GAVI and GVAP in he global vaccination business.
The only reason that Moderna would make SARS-CoV-2 is to release it. Otherwise the entire exercise would be financially futile, commercially pointless
The reason adduced by Fauci for doing gain of function research is that man needs to be ahead of nature or bad actors in order to have a vaccine in good time if a disease mutates or is genetically modified by the Chinese or the Russians to be lethal.
In order to believe that one has to believe that Moderna are interested in the saving people’s lives. I am sorry. All their actions show to me that they are interested in vaccinating people knowing how likely that is to cost them their lives.
They are interested in profit, the profit that comes from a pandemic. They are not saviours of mankind as they represent. They are our exploiters and our abusers.
They produced the virus in order to leak it, in order to pose as our saviours from their own leak. These are not the activities of a saviour figure. Luc Montagnier was trying to be our saviour from them and he was assassinated (professionally) by their groupies. Moderna were doing gain of function research in order to release the virus and force a vaccine for it in a manner which would maximise their profits. That is not a conspiracy theory. It is what happened precisely. Their share price went up by 20 times.
They released it in order to sell their vaccines and to destroy the immune systems of their customers because our immune systems reduce their profits. That is Big Pharma business.
The reason that the writer is so confident that Moderna or their agents made and leaked SARS-CoV-2 and the reason I called it as such at the start of the pandemic the U.S. Department of Defence funded the gene splicing of the novel coronavirus through NIH, NIAID and DARPA.
SARS-CoV-2 is spread through small aerosol droplets exhaled out of the mouth.
Prof Montagnier taught us that the vaccines cause the variants. Indeed basic virology forbids mass vaccination during a pandemic for that very reason. He said the the curve of deaths follows the curve of vaccinations. Paradoxically, if the vaccines caused Omicron, then they saved us from themselves!
News (35)
The time has come to hold people and organizations to account
The SARS-CoV-2 makers, the genetic vaccine makers. their funders and their promoters, which include almost every government and public sector and health service in the world, are therefore guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity. They have pushed genetic rape and sickness and death onto half of the population of the world in order to enrich the pockets of pharmaceutical companies. Governments and public sectors around the world have abandoned their health service regulation to billionaires and heartless corporations.
In the UK, all of the income tax Britons pay goes to the health service and all of its protocols are determined by its regulators and all of its regulators are controlled and funded by Big Pharma who seek to damage then manage our health for their profit.
So every penny the world spend in income tax brings us one step closer to sickness, to death and to drug dependency.
So why did Prof Montagnier choose to spend the last years of his life proving that SARS-CoV-2 was man made and that the spike proteins, and therefore the vaccines, were an existential threat to the species? What did he have left to prove to himself or to anybody else at 87-89? He certainly did not do it to increase his reputation in the profession.
No, he was driven by the same passion that drove him to discover HIV. A passion to SAVE mankind from viruses and those who would engineer them to damage us. Why did he die in February 2022? Because he knew that Omicron had the vaccines beat. His job was done by a greater virologist even than him. He could therefore rest in peace and go see some people who understood the magnitude of his contribution.
The covid virus was not made in 2019. It was made from the 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site which does not occur anywhere in nature.
Every covid death and every covid vaccine death is parked squarely on the doorstep of ModeRNA waiting for justice.
News (36)
Peter Daszak demands nearly $1 trillion to fund "pandemic prevention" efforts
Reporter: Natalie Winters, The National Pulse / https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/04/15/peter-daszak-calls-for-nearly-1-trillion
EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak – who used research grants administered by Anthony Fauci to collaborate with the Wuhan Institute of Virology – has demanded that President Joe Biden invest nearly $1 trillion into “pandemic prevention,” at cost to the American taxpayer.
Daszak,
born and educated in the United Kingdom, is infamous for his work with Chinese
Communist Party collaborators at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the
subsequent cover-up of COVID-19’s origins.
Now,
the disgraced scientist is demanding the U.S. taxpayer shoulder the burden of
protecting against his work manipulating “killer” pathogens by
funding new “protections” to the tune of nearly one trillion dollars over the
coming years.
The sizable ask is made in a new opinion editorial published by Fortune magazine, and comes
amidst ongoing scrutiny over Daszak’s research in conjunction with the Chinese
lab suspected by many as being responsible for the COVID-19 outbreak.
Despite this, Daszak is doubling down with his calls for
earmarking massive amounts of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund his research
purportedly aimed at “pandemic prevention.”
“The Biden administration clearly needs to invest
much more money to prevent and prepare for another pandemic,” Daszak and his
three co-authors explain in their April 11th op-ed, “Here’s how much the Biden
administration should be investing in infrastructure to prevent another
pandemic.”
Daszak proposes an initial investment worth over $500 billion,
which would ultimately be increased to $829 billion with “annual investments to
maintain capacity”:
Under reasonable assumptions, our analysis predicts maximum
gains arise from an initial investment of $511 billion, followed by a steady
increase of up to $829 billion and supported by annual investments to maintain
capacity. The returns to these investments would range between $9-$15 in
benefits per dollar invested. Altogether, our proposed investments in capacity
could generate up to $10.4 trillion in expected avoided damages to society, as
well as avoiding immeasurable human suffering.
“The U.S. should invest
far more in building capacity to both prevent pandemics and be
able to adapt to them should they occur. These additional resources would help
to prevent the next pandemic by making it possible to detect novel outbreaks
early on and use contact tracing to target and rush a response,” continue the
authors, parroting talking points used by Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance prior to the onset of COVID-19.
Daszak’s demands for nearly one trillion dollars
from American taxpayers also comes shortly after his critical role in quashing
inquiries into COVID-19’s potential lab origins in his capacity as an
investigator for the World Health Organization (WHO). New revelations from Vanity Fair suggest the Chinese Communist Party itself tapped him for the
role.
News (37)
UK Government data: The triple-vaccinated are just weeks from developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Source : The Expose / https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/13/gov-report-proves-triple-vaccinated-have-ade/
latest official figures from the UK Health Security Agency show that triple vaccinated people aged 30-70 have now lost at least 70% of their immune system capability compared to the natural immune system of unvaccinated people.
Their immune systems are deteriorating between 10 and 30% per week on average, with the detioration much larger and quicker among the younger age groups.
If this continues at the current rate then all triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation by the middle of April 2022, with all other triple vaccinated age-groups following suit not long after.
In other words, official UK Government data strongly suggests the triple vaccinated population are rapidly developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
News (38)
Expert: Theft of intellectual property from the CCP cannot rely solely on national security tools
Reporter : Andrew Thornebrooke / Chen Ting compiled / Editor : Ye Ziwei / https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/22/4/15/n13712088.htm
Image : Experts say the fight against China's anti-competitive and anti-free market actions cannot rely solely on national security tools. Members of a Chinese hacker group use computers at their office in Dongguan on 4 August 2020. (Nicolas Asfouri / AFP)
“Before China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), some of China’s core practices, such as forced technology transfer, restricted market access, and industrial subsidies, have been a concern for U.S. policymakers.” said Emily Kilcrease, a senior researcher at Center for a New American Security (CNAS). CNAS is an American think tank focused on security issues.
"However, 20 years later, China's practices have intensified, not fulfilling its commitment to a free market economy when it joined the WTO, but expanding non-market behaviors, including: using the Internet to steal intellectual property, attract talent, Abuse of the open American academic environment, and economic coercion."
Kilkress made the comments during a U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission hearing. The committee, an advisory body to the U.S. Congress, discusses thorny and sometimes vicious Chinese trade practices.
She said the U.S. has become increasingly pessimistic about China's business practices and dissatisfied with the leadership's inability to deal with China's anti-competitive actions.
"Americans are increasingly pessimistic about China's endless stream of non-market actions as these practices persist and the United States and its allies and partners fail to develop adequate and effective responses to ensure that our companies and workers can environment," Kilkress said.
She said the U.S. "relys heavily on national security-focused defense tools" such as export controls and investment screening in its fight against rampant intellectual property theft and clandestine financial takeovers. She further suggested that the United States should develop non-security-related tools to combat China's activities in the market.
"The U.S. should develop other approaches to address concerns about China's non-market behavior that are not relevant to broader national security, and should consider the use of national security tools as part of addressing China's non-market behavior as a whole," Kilkress said. part of the strategy."
It's worth noting, however, that there may be no benefit to direct negotiations with China, Kilkress said, as the regime believes that the United States is currently unable to effectively combat international intellectual property theft in its favor.
“At this point, direct negotiations with China are unlikely to yield meaningful results,” Kilkress said. “There is little incentive for China to commit to binding rules because it would require structural reforms to the system, but They believe that these systems serve their economic and political goals."
Therefore, she suggested that the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council work together to create a new multilateral system for investment and export controls.
"The new regime must provide a forum for the United States and its partners and allies to coordinate export controls to reach broader strategic goals, including China, Russia, or other countries identified as being of concern," Kilkress said.
News (39)
2-year-old diagnosed with "severe coma" and no one rescued? The condition is very rare
Reporter : Lynn Ru / https://news.tvbs.com.tw/life/1768164
A 2-year-old boy from Zhonghe District, New Taipei City was infected with covi. His condition deteriorated in just 3 days, and he was sent to the intensive care unit for intubation treatment. The child was delayed in getting to the hospital. In response, New Taipei Mayor Hou Youyi held a briefing on the New Taipei epidemic in the afternoon. New Taipei Health Director Chen Runqiu pointed out that the case was examined in the morning of 14 April, and the condition changed rapidly in the afternoon. "This is very rare." For the treatment, we also invited the pediatric critical care experts from National Taiwan University to consult together and give all-out medical care. The Health Bureau also provides care and assistance.
The Central Epidemic Command Centre announced on 16 April 2022 that there were 1,199 new local confirmed cases in the Republic of China, with New Taipei City having the most cases at 434. It is worth noting that it was the first time that a child under 5 years old was severely ill. The command centre explained the case and pointed out that the case was admitted to the intensive care unit on the day of the diagnosis on 14 April with acute encephalitis and multiple organ abnormalities, which was the first case of a severely-ill child.
The family complained to the media on the 15th that the 2-year-old boy started to have a fever the next day after being diagnosed with covid by his relative. Sick children are not transported to hospital without ambulances. The family also pointed out that there was a communication problem because the case number was not listed in the process of sending the doctor. The child was not sent to the doctor until he lost consciousness.
Chen Runqiu further explained that the case was examined on the morning of 14 April, and the condition changed rapidly in the afternoon. This is very rare. At the moment, please ask Shuanghe Hospital for emergency treatment, and also invite the pediatric critical care experts from National Taiwan University to consult together, and give all-out medical care. The Health Bureau also provides care and assistance.
Chen Runqiu said that the handling process of this case, whether in the public health system, 1922, 119, the health bureau or the hospital, is fully handled, and we hope to handle the matter well, "The family is very anxious, we have also noticed this situation, and the hospital is also requested. Make every effort to provide professional medical care.”
In response to the questioned child's delay in seeking medical treatment, the commander of the command centre, Chen Shizhong, also released a timetable to clarify his doubts. The special line for epidemic prevention was later sent to the New Taipei City Health Bureau by 1922. After receiving the information, the New Taipei Health Bureau immediately contacted the relevant hospital. After confirming the situation with the child's parents at 6.30 am, it contacted 119 to send the child to the hospital. At 7 am, an ambulance was dispatched and the child was sent to the hospital at about 7.31 am.
News (40)
No comments:
Post a Comment