Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Emirates opens new branch office-cum-travel store in Singapore on 6 May 2025

Report, photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA


On 6 May 2025, Emirates launches its new branch office-cum-travel store at the first level of Odeon 333 Building in Singapore. The new office faces opposite Raffles Hotel. The airline hopes that the new prime location will attract bookings for its flights to Dubai, Phnom Penh and Melbourne from Singapore Changi Airport.


The new travel store of Emirates advertises its inflight services and new livery fleet but there are no brochures, timetables and inflight magazines in the office. Visitors can only buy air tickets, get assistance in Emirates flight bookings and explore the range of inflight duty free items that are available for orders to be collected onboard.

Also on display is a full-scale installation of Emirates' iconic A380 first-class private suite, where visitors can experience inflight service on a first-class seat without boarding the plane.

Although the new travel store is said to open from Mondays to Saturdays from 9.30 am to 6.30 pm, the office is not opened at the time of my visit on 8 June 2025 (Saturday), which happens to be the public holiday Hari Raya Haji.

According to The Peak, Emirates' launch of the new travel store is in celebration of its 35 years of services to Singapore.

Friday, June 6, 2025

Statistics found that this day of the week is the least stressful to fly

 Direct translation

Reporter : Jin Jing / Editor : Lin Qing / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2025/06/05/a103993334.htmlImage : Statistics found that flights at certain times make people feel relaxed, while at other times are stressful. (Anton Gvozdikov/Shutterstock)

统计发现 一周中的这一天坐飞机压力最小

As summer approaches, the peak tourist season begins to arrive, and the service pressure at airports is also increasing. People who travel by plane all hope to have a relaxing trip. The latest statistics find that flights departing at certain times will make people more relaxed.

"HappyOrNot" is a company that produces terminal equipment for airport customer feedback. USA Today reported that based on the data collected, the company found that flights departing in the early morning and mid-week flights have higher customer satisfaction.

Early morning flights are best

"HappyOrNot" CEO McKitalo explained that early morning hours such as 4, 7 and 8 am are the most pleasant travel times. These quieter times often mean cleaner terminals, more alert staff and shorter lines.

Late-night flights, especially around midnight, can be among the most frustrating times to depart. This can be due to a combination of factors, including fatigue, fewer staff on duty and limited amenities (shops, lounges and restaurants are often closed).

Early flights have the added benefit of being the least likely to be canceled or delayed, as airlines' risk of delays accumulates over time. Being on time may also be one reason passengers feel less stressed.

Tuesday is the most relaxing day at the airport

Tuesday is typically the happiest day for air travelers, while Sunday is the most frustrating day for travelers, according to Satisfied Unsatisfied.

A January report from travel site Expedia noted that Tuesday is typically the least crowded day of the week at many airports, which also helps to make for a smooth travel experience.

Flying in February is a good idea

If time permits, February is a great time of year to travel. That is according to the company, based on 51 million data from 2024.

"Interestingly, February is the best month to fly - for many people, it may be the first trip of the year, and the airport experience in February is quieter and more efficient than the peak summer season," said McKitalo.

The data also shows that August is often the busiest month for air passengers, which is the peak period for summer travel.

Strange phenomena surrounding Xi Jinping who "hosted a family dinner" to Lukashenko

 Direct translation

Xi Jinping "hosted a family dinner" and appeared in public, and many anomalies appeared in Zhongnanhai

Editor : Tang Zheng / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2025/06/06/a103993412.htmlImage : Since last year, various strange phenomena have appeared in the political situation of the Chinese Communist Party. The picture is a schematic diagram. (Leah Millis/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

习近平“摆家宴”露面演戏 中南海现多个异常

Since last year, various strange phenomena have appeared in the political situation of the Chinese Communist Party. Recently, the party leader Xi Jinping reappeared after disappearing for 14 days, and held a so-called "family dinner" with Belarusian President Lukashenko to try to quell the outside world's speculation about Xi's "loss of power".

Since 20 May 2025, Xi Jinping has been absent from the public eye for 14 days as of 3 June 2025 after inspecting Luoyang, Henan. The outside world also noticed that the official media used to report on the monthly meetings of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, but the official media has not reported on the Politburo meeting in May so far, and even the official media's coverage of Xi has become less and less.

In addition, Belarusian President Lukashenko paid a three-day visit to China on 2 June 2025. Until the morning of the 4th, the official media of the CPC said that Xi met with Lukashenko in Zhongnanhai.

The CPC party media was very low-key about Lukashenko's visit and did not announce his visit in advance; on 2 June 2025, it simply reported the news that "the Belarusian president arrived in Beijing"; on the 3rd, the spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was asked about the details of Lukashenko's visit and remained silent, only saying that "China will release relevant information in due course."

Even more bizarre is that the Belarusian official emphasized that Lukashenko's visit to China was not a working visit or a state visit, but just a "special visit for a family-style friendly lunch."

In this regard, current affairs commentator Wen Zhao recently posted on the overseas X platform that Lukashenko's visit this time was quite strange and raised new questions. This was not a state visit or a working visit. But he stayed for a long time, which was equivalent to a state visit. However, both sides were very low-key. The Belarusian Deputy Prime Minister who accompanied Lukashenko to Beijing said that this was not a formal working visit, but a visit for a family-friendly lunch.

Wen Zhao believes that this defense can come from the mouth of the Belarusian Deputy Prime Minister, which is self-proving bullshit. This time Lukashenko visited with the Deputy Prime Minister and government entourage. It just shows that it is not a family visit or a visit, but a working visit. Who Lukashenko met and what he talked about in Beijing in the past two days is a big problem.

The report of the BelTA Chinese website mentioned that Xi Jinping told Lukashenko during the meeting: "My office is next door. This is the first time I have received you here." Lukashenko thanked Xi for "inviting me to your home." In return, Lukashenko said "I will wait for you at my home."

According to public information, after the founding of the Communist Party of China, the party leader's office has been located on Yingtai Island in Zhongnanhai. In this regard, many overseas commentators analyzed that this may indicate that Xi Jinping's office has been moved out of Yingtai Island. Some people even suspect that Xi Jinping may have been under house arrest in the area near Chunyi Zhai or Fengze Garden.

Political commentator Tang Qing said in the program "Tang Qing's View of Current Affairs" that Xi's meeting with Kashenko was normal diplomacy on the surface, but the scene looked like "just sitting at home". The Xinhua News Agency's press release was less than 400 words, and even the location of the meeting was not clearly stated, with only one sentence "Meeting in Zhongnanhai". CCTV's picture was even more obvious. There was no national flag, no welcome ceremony, no formal conference table, and even no flowers were given. It was like a temporary visit to chat.

Tang Qing said that only Wang Yi was accompanying him, and even Cai Qi, director of the General Office of the CPC Central Committee, and He Lifeng, vice premier of the State Council, were nowhere to be seen. Looking at Xi Jinping again, he was indescribably haggard, his mouth was tightly pursed, and his expression was dull. What is even more strange is that the People's Daily did not mention the meeting at all that day. The front page still featured Li Qiang and Ding Xuexiang, and Xi Jinping was not even shown in the photo. Who would believe you if you said this was not a signal?

Tang Qing said that what is even more intriguing is that Lukashenko did not mention the three words "Xi Jinping" throughout the whole process, but only said "thank China" and "highly trust China". You know, he had been praising China before, saying "President Xi's experience in governing the country is worth learning from all over the world", etc. This sudden change of words is meaningful.

On 6 June 2025, Wang Youqun, a former official of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China, wrote in the Epoch Times that there are at least ten strange things about Xi's meeting with Lukashenko, judging from the Chinese arrangement: First, this is Lukashenko's first visit to China after he was elected president for the seventh time on 27 January 2025; second, according to Belarus, Lukashenko's visit was for Xi; third, Belarusian media reported that Lukashenko said to Xi: "You invited me to your home... I am very grateful to you, of course, I will wait for you at my home." However, there is no report that Lukashenko met any of Xi's family members, including Xi's wife Peng Liyuan.

Fourth, the official media did not say where Xi met Lukashenko in Zhongnanhai; fifth, the picture of Xi and Lu talking in a hall, there are no pictures of welcoming, seeing off, and tea. Sixth, the meeting between the two did not contain any substantive content; Seventh, the CCP party media did not mention that Xi invited the Belarusian president to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and military parade to be held in Beijing from the end of August to the beginning of September this year; Eighth, Lukashenko only met with Xi during his three-day visit to Beijing; Ninth, Beijing did not issue a notice in advance for Lukashenko's visit; Tenth, Xinhua News Agency did not add a photo in the first news about Xi's meeting with Lukashenko, and only added a photo two hours later? This is also abnormal.

Wang Youqun believes that Lukashenko is an ally of Russian President Putin. Recently, there have been rumors in the international community that Xi's power has fallen into the hands of others, and Putin and Lukashenko may want to know whether Xi still has real power. Lukashenko's visit may have been entrusted by Putin to go to Beijing to find out whether Xi is really powerful.

Wang Youqun said that judging from the ten strange things about Xi's meeting with Lukashenko, it is likely that the recent rumours overseas that Xi is still in power on the surface, but in fact the general trend has gone, and that CCP veteran Wen Jiabao, Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission Zhang Youxia and others have become key factors influencing China's political situation are true. Xi is just following the script set by the CCP. (Related link)

Gordon Chang, a well-known American expert on China, told Fox News that something may have happened inside the CCP government and questioned whether Xi Jinping has lost power.


Thursday, June 5, 2025

The possible collapse of the CCP will lead to long-term unrest in China

 Direct translation

After the chaos, the CPC Central Committee collapsed and the provinces became independent?
—Yan Chungou: June 4th is unlikely to happen again. The collapse of the CCP will lead to long-term unrest

Commentator : Yan Chungou / Editor: Fang Xun / https://www.aboluowang.com/2025/0604/2228219.html / Image : 
Data photo


2006 was the 40th anniversary of the Cultural Revolution. At that time, I wrote an article reviewing my patriotic feelings over the past 40 years. The title was "Patriotic Feelings in the Past 40 Years". The article mentioned June 4th: "The June 4th Incident exhausted the Chinese people's sense of moral justice. The patriotic enthusiasm was crushed by tanks. The frustration and helplessness of the year gradually faded with the economic growth and improvement of life over the past decade. The ideals of democracy and freedom were anesthetized by the desire to pursue worldly happiness. Everyone's life has improved, but the soul cannot settle down."

Now it seems that these few words are basically accurate. The Chinese people's sense of moral justice was exhausted in June 4th. In the years that followed, although liberal intellectuals and human rights lawyers were once active, they could not withstand the suppression of the CCP after all, and have basically been dispersed. Except for a few righteous patriots (such as Peng Lifa and the female college students in the White Paper Movement), most Chinese people have become accustomed to an unjust society and have barely coexisted with a corrupt government. They have become quite indifferent to the political demands for democracy and freedom. Therefore, even if Hu Yaobang exists today, his persecution and death may not cause a social trend as big as June 4th.

Recently, Wang Dan hosted a discussion on the success or failure of June 4 online. The attendees included Xu Chenggang, Lin Peirui, Hu Ping, Zhang Chaohua, Zheng Xuguang, and Xiang Xiaoji. Hu Ping and Zhang Chaohua mainly debated the topic of "quit while you are ahead", Lin Peirui spoke very little, and Zheng Xuguang sorted out some of the activities of the CCP's top leaders at that time, and many of the materials were very valuable. Xiang Xiaoji mainly talked about his views on the movement. Professor Xu Chenggang raised a question, why June 4 failed in China, but the democratic movement was successful in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This question is indeed worth pondering.

June 4 was the largest civil resistance movement since the founding of the Communist Party of China. It brought the patriotic sentiment of "every man has a share of responsibility for the rise and fall of the country" in Chinese traditional culture to the extreme. At that time, college students and citizens regarded the rise and fall of the country and the welfare of the people as their unshirkable responsibilities. They took risks and took risks, with the sole purpose of exchanging personal efforts for the progress of the entire nation.

Unfortunately, the Chinese encountered the Communist Party. Why were the political demands of the Chinese people crushed by the violence of the CCP, while the same democratic trend was crushed in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe? My idea is that this is determined by China's traditional culture and China's political reality played a key role.

At the time of June 4th, China had only opened its doors for a short ten years, and the political enlightenment of the Chinese people was only in its early stages. Most Chinese people did not understand the meaning of modern politics, and the Confucian concept of monarch-monarch, minister-minister, father-father, and son-son still lingered in the lives of the Chinese people. June 4th only touched the hearts of students and a few citizens. A large number of Chinese farmers and industrial workers were still in ignorance, and the movement did not receive the response of the general public.

Secondly, the CCP is a party that fights for power and sits on the throne. Mao Zedong and the top leaders of the CCP are full of imperial ideas. The CCP is a party with Marxism-Leninism as its shell and feudalism as its core. They lie without blushing and kill without blinking an eye. Therefore, the CCP regards armed suppression as the only way to solve problems.

The former Soviet Union was also quite barbaric during the Lenin-Stalin era, but after all, they had a Christian cultural tradition. By the time of Gorbachev, the core strength of the party had deeply degenerated, and at the same time, the national strength was weakening day by day. From the reality of the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was not the Soviet people who rose up in resistance on a large scale, but the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee itself was paralyzed. This is why Yeltsin stood on the tank and raised his arms before the armed suppression began, and the whole situation changed.

This is just like the October Revolution, which did not actually go through a long and arduous struggle. It was just that the Russian naval officers and soldiers rushed to the Tsar’s palace and overthrew a corrupt regime. In the late Qing Dynasty in China, the court itself collapsed and collapsed after a slight impact.

In the above article, I also said: "The worst things in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe have already happened, and the worst things in China have not yet happened." The fate of China in the future depends on the rise and fall of the two variables of the CCP's stability maintenance force and the civil resistance force. The CCP's stability maintenance force is constantly weakened, while the civil resistance force is constantly gathering. Under this situation, the day of the CCP's collapse will come.

The problem is that the Chinese people have exhausted their patriotism and moral sense of justice. People now only care about their immediate lives. They are already overwhelmed by the difficulties they face, and they have no common political ideals, no imagination and consensus on the future of China. Therefore, it is impossible to expect another large-scale mass movement.

During the June 4th Incident, maintaining stability was also a new issue for the CCP. There were no armed police and no high-tech control measures at that time. At that time, the civilian intellectual elites were still quite active, and patriotism among students was still quite common. The CCP's social control was looser than it is today. If there were small-scale social protests today, the CCP would have extinguished them in their infancy and would not allow them to develop into a trend. Therefore, there are no subjective and objective conditions today to brew a large-scale social protest movement like the June 4th student movement.

The CCP's rule has reached a dead end, and it is unable to maintain stability. The accumulated public grievances are constantly rising. One day, people's resistance will occur universally, but those resistances will be small and scattered, which will weaken the CCP's grassroots construction. The CCP will exhaust its vitality in the long-term social unrest. By then, the CCP's governance will be incapable and society will be in disorder.

In the future, China will not leap from autocracy to democracy overnight. China will definitely go through a long period of civil unrest. The central government will collapse, and the provinces will be independent or co-governed. Then they will slowly find consensus. If they can negotiate to establish a national system with a democratic prototype, it will be a blessing. If not, it will be the end of the former Soviet Union.


Airport Pictures : The maps of Phuquoc

 Photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA