Reporter : Pascal / Editor : Zhao Liangxuan / https://www.aboluowang.com/2021/0401/1575565.html / Direct translation
The danger of the COVID “vaccine” seems to be getting worse... All viruses are cold viruses with a 99% recovery rate (better than FLU). Now, records show that nearly 4,000 people have died and more than 162,000 people are “harmful”. The response to the so-called "miracle". In fact, the former Pfizer vice president warned that the vaccine may be "used for mass population reduction."
Health impact news report:
EudraVigilance, a European database of suspicious drug response reports, is now tracking reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 "vaccine".
This is EudraVigilance's statement about its database:
The website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide the public with reports of suspicious side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are electronically submitted to EudraVigilance by the national drug regulatory agency and pharmaceutical companies holding drug sales licenses (licenses).
EudraVigilance is a system for collecting reports of suspicious side effects. These reports are used to evaluate the benefits and risks of the drug development process, and to monitor its safety after obtaining authorization from the European Economic Area (EEA). EudraVigilance has been used since December 2001.
The publication of this website complies with the EudraVigilance access policy, which is formulated to improve public health by supporting the monitoring of drug safety and to increase the transparency of stakeholders including the public.
The European Medicines Agency's Management Committee approved the first revision of EudraVigilance's access strategy in December 2010 and was approved by the Board of Pharmacovigilance in December 2015 in accordance with the 2010 Legislation. This policy aims to provide stakeholders (such as the national drug regulatory authority in the EEA, the European Commission, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers, and the pharmaceutical industry and research organizations) with reports on suspicious side effects.
Transparency is a key guiding principle of the IAEA and is essential for building trust and confidence in regulatory procedures. By increasing transparency, the IAEA can better meet the growing demand for information from various stakeholders, including the public. (source.)
Their report before March 13, 2021 listed 3,964 deaths and 162,610 injuries after 3 experimental COVID-19 injections:
COVID-19 MRNA vaccine Hyundai (CX-024414), COVID-19 MRNA vaccine PFIZER-BIONTECH (TOZINAMERAN) and COVID-19 vaccine Astradanica (CHADOX1 NCOV-19).
Data on the fourth experimental COVID “vaccine” COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) is also provided. We did not include data taken by Johnson and Johnson COVID in this report, but we will include it in future reports.
A health impact news subscriber in Europe ran a report for the three COVID-19 shots we included here, which are summary data before March 13, 2021.
Total response of the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2, Comirnaty) from BioNTech/Pfizer: 2,540 deaths and 102,100 injuries, until 13/03/2021
COVID-19 MRNA vaccine PFIZER-BIONTECH (TOZINAMERAN)
This is public information funded by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), but it is clearly censored by the company media.
The American frontline doctor added:
The American Frontline Doctor (AFLDS) told Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president and chief scientific officer of Pfizer, his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, regulatory agencies, etc.
At the beginning, Dr. Yeton said: "I know very well that a large percentage of the world's population has committed global crimes against humanity.
"I was very frightened, but I did not prevent the panel of experts from giving testimony to such versatile lawyers as Rocco Galati from Canada and Reiner Fuellmich from Germany.
"I have absolutely no doubt that we have evil (dangerous products) (this is a decision I have never made in my 40-year research career).
"In the UK, it is very clear that the authorities are going all out, which will lead to the'vaccination' management of as many people as possible. This is crazy because even if these agents are legal, only those that have increased significantly People who are at risk of dying from the virus need to be protected. Among these people, there may even be an argument that the risk is worth taking. There is absolutely the so-called "mechanical" risk: inherent in the way they work.
"But all other people, in good health, young people under 60, maybe a little older, they will not be infected with the virus. In this large group, it is totally unethical to manage something novel and After a few months, there was no potential adverse effects at all.
"In any other era, the intention to make a statement is wise.
"Because I know this for sure, and I know that people who drive also know this, we have to ask: What is their motivation?
"Although I don't know, I have strong theoretical answers. Only one of them is related to money, and the motivation does not work because the same result can be obtained by doubling the unit cost and halving the agent's cost. People. The dilemma is resolved. So this is another matter.
Realizing that the entire population also intends to include minor children and eventually babies in the net, this is what I think is evil.
"There is no medical basis. As far as I know, these "vaccines" are designed to cause the expression of spike proteins in the recipient's body. The spike proteins themselves have unfavorable biological effects and are harmful in some people (inducing blood To coagulate and activate the immune "complement system"), I am determined to point out that those who are not threatened by this virus should not be exposed to the risk of harmful effects of these drugs."
AFLDS: The Israeli Supreme Court’s decision to lift COVID flight restrictions last week said: “In the future, legally speaking, any new restrictions on access to Israel will require a comprehensive, fact-based, and data-based basis.”
In a speech four months ago, you said
"Immunity to respiratory viruses (such as SARS CoV-2) is most likely to last for many years. Why do I say this? In fact, we have data on a virus called SARS that swept the world 17 years ago. Remember that the similarity between SARS CoV-2 and SARS is 80%, so I think this is the best comparison anyone can provide.
"The evidence is clear: these very smart cellular immunologists studied all the people they could find who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample and tested whether they had done anything against the original SARS. They reacted and did them all. They all have completely normal and robust T cell memory. In fact, they are so similar, so they are also protected by SARS CoV-2. This is cross-immunity.
"So, what I want to say is that the best data is that immunity should be stable for at least 17 years. I think it is entirely possible that it will be lifelong. These people’s T cells respond in the same way as you respond after vaccination. Then I came back a few years later to see if this immunity was retained. Therefore, I think there is sufficient evidence that the duration of immunity will be several years, or even life."
In other words, previous exposure to SARS (that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2) conferred immunity to SARS CoV-2.
The Israeli government invoked the new variant to justify the blockade, flight closures, restrictions and the issuance of "green passports". In view of the Supreme Court’s decision, do you think it is possible to preempt future government measures, related variants, immunization, herd immunity, etc., can provide accurate information to lawyers who will challenge those future measures?
Yeadon: "My overview of SARS immunity is exactly what we are in SARS-CoV-2
saw.
The research comes from one of the best laboratories in the field.
"So, theoretically, people can test their T cell immunity by measuring the cell response in a small part of the blood. With such tests, they are not "high throughput" and may cost hundreds of dollars per scale. US dollars. But not thousands. The tests I know are not yet commercially available, but are only being studied in the UK
"However, I hope that the company can induce the company to provide large-scale test kits "for research" under the premise of reaching an agreement. If you plan to test thousands of unvaccinated Israelis, it may be a double Bladed sword. According to the experience of other countries/regions, 30-50% of people have previously been immune, and about 25% have been infected and are now immune.
"Personally, I don’t want to deal with the authorities in their own way: unless you get another proof, you are suspected of being the source of infection. You don’t need to prove that you have no health risk to others. Those without symptoms will never threaten others. In any case, as long as those who are worried about the virus have been vaccinated, there is no reason why other people need to be vaccinated."
My understanding of "missing medicine" is that it can only relieve symptoms after vaccination, but cannot stop the spread. Therefore, it can spread more deadly viruses.
For example, in China, they deliberately use a leaky bird flu vaccine to quickly eliminate chickens because they will die within three days if they are not vaccinated. In Marek’s disease, they need to save all the chickens. The only solution is to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated chickens have a high risk of death. Therefore, how to use leaked false information is driven by intention, that is, intention may cause great harm to unvaccinated.
Stronger strains usually don’t spread among people because they kill the host too fast, but if they are only inoculated with less severe diseases, they will spread these strains to people with serious diseases and The unvaccinated people who died.
Do you agree with this assessment? In addition, do you agree that if people who have not been vaccinated become susceptible, the only way is to prevent HCQ for patients who have not yet used COVID-19?
If this is the case, will the Zelenko Protocol fight these greater pressures?
Moreover, if many people already have the aforementioned "17-year SARS immunity", will they be immune to any super variants?
"I think the story of Gerrt Vanden Bossche is highly questionable. There is no evidence that vaccines are causing or will cause "dangerous mutations." I worry that this is a trick.
"Generally speaking, variants form frequently and gradually become less dangerous as they balance with the human host, and become more contagious over time. Variants usually do not become more dangerous.
"There is no variation that differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all the variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.
"Variation is likely to be "evasion of immunity". This is an illusion and an evil act.
"Not only is it impossible in nature-because the similarity of the mutation means that the immunized person (whether it is a natural infection or vaccination) has zero chance of being diseased by the mutation-and it is supported by the experience of high-quality research.
"The research I'm referring to shows that people who have recovered from an infection or who have been vaccinated with ALL have a wide range of immune cells that can recognize all mutations.
"" This article explains why the immune system has a wide range of molecular recognition capabilities, so that small changes in variants become irrelevant.
"I can't be firm enough: the story about the demand for variants and supplementary vaccines is false. I worry that there is a very vicious reason behind all of this. Of course, there is no best way to check immunity. The statement is in progress. The examination is always lacking in substantive content, and various techniques, such as manipulating conditions, are used to test the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies may not be important in the protection of the host against the virus. There are some "natural experiments". Unfortunately, these Humans cannot produce antibodies, but they can reject this virus quite successfully. It is definitely better to use antibodies than no antibodies. The reason I mention these rare patients is because they show that antibodies are not essential for host immunity.
"The only people who may still be vulnerable and need prevention or treatment are those who are older and/or sick and do not wish to be vaccinated (this is their right).
"The good news is that there are multiple options: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroids used by asthmatics), and of course oral vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin, etc. These reduce the severity of The virus does not need to be a public health crisis."
Do you think the FDA has done a good job in regulating large pharmaceutical companies? How do large pharmaceutical companies pass regulatory agencies? Do you think they did this in mRNA injection?
"Until recently, I have attached great importance to global drug regulatory agencies. When I was working at Pfizer, I later founded a biotechnology company (Ziarco, which was later acquired by Novartis), and we had friendly relations with the FDA, EMA and UK MHRA. Contacts.
Always maintain good quality interaction.
"Recently, I noticed that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) has allocated grants to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Would that be appropriate? They are funded by public funds. They should never accept private institutions Provided funds.
"So this is an example of a conflict of interest in the UK regulator.
"The European Medicines Agency did not require certain regulations to be disclosed in the document "hack" when reviewing Pfizer vaccines.
"You can view an example of Reiner Fuellmich's "Corona Council" online.
"Therefore, I no longer believe that the regulator has the ability to protect us. Therefore, "approval" is meaningless.
"Dr. Me, Wolfgang Wodarg and I applied to the EMA for a genetic vaccine on December 1, 2020. They ignored us.
"Recently, we wrote to them privately to warn them that they had blood clots, and they ignored us. When we wrote publicly, we were thoroughly scrutinized. A few days later, more than a dozen countries suspended the use of vaccines on the grounds of blood clots. .
"I think the huge capital of the pharmaceutical industry combined with the cash of BMGF has created such an environment, in this environment, regulators cannot refuse.
"I have to go back to the issue of'recharged vaccines' (intensified injections). This is the whole narrative that I fear he will use and use to gain unparalleled power for us.
Please warn everyone not to approach the rechargeable vaccine. There is absolutely no need.
"Since they are not needed, but they are produced in a pharmaceutical factory, and the regulatory agency has shelved it (no safety testing), I can only infer that they will be used for nefarious purposes.
"For example, if someone wants to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world's population in the next few years, the system established now will make it possible.
"I think this is entirely possible for large-scale population reduction."
No comments:
Post a Comment