CCP's Winter Olympics propaganda and reality split
Image : On 1 February 2022, Zhangjiakou, Hebei province, uses artificial snow to pave the ski field for the Winter Olympics. Many experts have criticized this, pointing out that the pollution and harm that the Beijing Winter Olympics will cause to the local area can be imagined. (Christof Stache/AFP via Getty Images)
The 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics opened amid controversy and desertion. After checking the relevant facts, the reporter confirmed that the CCP's propaganda about the Beijing Winter Olympics is divided from reality.
News (13)
Many international politicians are absent from the Winter Olympics
The CCP authorities have previously said that dozens of international dignitaries have come to China to support the Beijing Winter Olympics. However, compared with the 2008 Summer Olympics, the number of international dignitaries attending the Beijing Winter Olympics has shrunk considerably in terms of level and number.
The guests attending the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics included 54 heads of state, 16 heads of government, 9 representatives of the royal family, 1 regional director and 4 wives of the president, including Western powers.
The CCP officially announced the list of international dignitaries to attend the 2022 Winter Olympics, with only 32 people, including seven heads of international organizations, including the President of the International Olympic Committee, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the President of the General Assembly, and the Director-General of the World Health Organization. At the 2008 Olympics, the heads of international organizations were not even listed as international politicians by the CCP.
Even so, when the 24th Winter Olympics was held in Beijing on 4 February 2022, all the international dignitaries who had promised to attend were not able to show up.
According to a report by CCP media Xinhuanet on 5 February, only 30 international VIPs attended the opening ceremony, instead of the 32 previously announced by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Comparing the official report of the Chinese Communist Party on 5 February with the guest list previously announced by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, it can be seen that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Ahmedov were absent from the Beijing Winter Olympics. (Screenshot of the official website of the State Council of the Communist Party of China)
The reporter compared the official report of the Communist Party of China on 5 February with the guest list previously announced by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and confirmed that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed and Azerbaijan Deputy Prime Minister Ahmedov, who were expected to be there, did not appear at the international party who attended the opening ceremony on the day reported by the party media on the guest list.
As of the writing of this article, the CCP authorities have not explained why only 23 of the 25 foreign leaders who had originally promised to attend were present; only in a report by Xinhua News Agency on 4 February, it was mentioned that many countries, including Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed, were present. The leaders wished the Beijing Winter Olympics and Paralympics a complete success in various ways.
The United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and other countries have publicly expressed their diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics because of the CCP's human rights issues. Although European countries have not made a clear statement, the vast majority of European leaders did not participate in the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics.
News (14)
The Winter Olympics is not running frugally
According to the official announcement of the Communist Party of China, the three concepts of Beijing's bid for the 2022 Winter Olympics are "athlete-centered, sustainable development, and economical hosting of the Games".
However, an investigative report by Business Insider on 30 January 2022 revealed that the Beijing Winter Olympics were not frugal. The CCP spent as much as $38.5 billion for the Beijing Winter Olympics, 24 times the original budget of $1.6 billion.
The report said that according to official Chinese statistics, the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics cost only $3.9 billion, making it the lowest-cost Olympics in the past 20 years including National Speed Skating Hall and more.
In addition to these venues, there are many hidden costs for the Beijing Winter Olympics that are not included in the calculation, such as the cost of "weather manipulation", including artificial rain, artificial snow, clean air, and more. In addition, some athletes expressed their admiration for the room facilities, abundant meals and smart beds in the Beijing Winter Olympic Village on social media, which undoubtedly cost a lot of money.
The hidden costs of the authorities go far beyond that. According to public reports, the Beijing Winter Olympics will be an important window for the CCP to promote its artificial intelligence, robots and digital currency to the international community while European and American countries have warned their athletes to be wary of being monitored and secretly stolen by the CCP’s new technology while in Beijing.
According to party media reports, the CCP not only presents hardware devices such as digital RMB wearable wallets to foreign athletes but also equips the Olympic Village with various smart facilities and provides robotic services. The exact amount of these huge expenses will not be known to the outside world.
The extreme epidemic prevention measures that are difficult for foreign guests to accept also represent a huge amount of money poured into by the authorities.
For example, the BBC disclosed that there are about 60,000 athletes, delegation officials, media, and volunteers in the "closed-loop" system of the Beijing Winter Olympics. Based on this estimate, during the 17 days of the Winter Olympics, each person will perform a nucleic acid test once a day, and the cost of a single test will be about 20 yuan. The cost of nucleic acid testing alone will be as high as 20.4 million RMB. This does not include the cost of isolation and treatment after a positive test, as well as the human and material costs of implementing epidemic prevention for the entire "closed-loop" system.
For the Beijing Winter Olympics, there are still many expenses that the CCP cannot see, including the "appearance fee" of international dignitaries. For example, many netizens criticized the CCP on social media for spending US$500 million to invite the heads of five Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan) to attend the Winter Olympics.
The CCP’s opaque system prevents such claims from being independently verified.
However, Xi Jinping's speech published on the CCP's official website on 25 January 2022 shows that the CCP promised to provide 500 million US dollars in free assistance to the five Central Asian countries in the next three years. An official report on February 5 indicated that the heads of state of the five Central Asian countries did indeed attend the Beijing Winter Olympics.
News (15)
The Beijing Winter Olympics is doubted to be "environmentally friendly" and "sustainable"
Although the Chinese authorities have repeatedly claimed that the Beijing Winter Olympics are "sustainable" and that all venues use 100% green electricity, some environmentalists and experts have questioned this.
In response to Beijing's claim that the Olympics are "carbon neutral" for the first time, the environmental group Greenpeace has said it is difficult to assess whether the goal has actually been achieved without further data.
The use of artificial snow and the consumption of water resources in the Beijing Winter Olympics has been criticized by the outside world.
According to a report by the French Radio on 31 January 2022, Carmen de Jong, a geographer at the University of Strasbourg in France, is firmly opposed to the Beijing Winter Olympics. She believes that holding the Olympics in a region without snowfall and lack of water resources is a ridiculous decision.
In an interview with German TV 2, de Jong said that the Beijing Winter Olympics cannot be sustainable in terms of water use, carbon emissions, site selection, soil erosion and many other aspects. She believes that the Beijing Winter Olympics is the "most unsustainable" Winter Olympics.
Martin Müller, a professor at the Faculty of Geography and Sustainability at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland, explicitly condemned Beijing, saying that the so-called "Green Olympics" was a misnomer. He criticized that the pollution and harm caused by the Beijing Winter Olympics to the local area can be imagined.
News (16)
There are many problems with poor meals in the isolation hotel at the Winter Olympics, and athletes from many countries cry
Image: The picture shows a security officer at the road checkpoint leading to the closed-loop "Bubble" of Qinghe Station on 29 January 2022. (Jewel Samad/AFP)
There is not enough food, the meals are inedible, there is no training equipment, and the hygiene of the isolation room is poor. Some foreign athletes who unfortunately tested positive for covid during the Beijing Olympics believe their quarantine conditions are making a bad situation worse.
"My stomach hurts, I'm pale, and I have huge dark circles around my eyes. I'm going to end this. I cry every day. I'm very tired." Russian biathlete Valery, quarantined in a quarantine hotel in Beijing Valeria Vasnetsova, posted on Instagram.
Her problem was not symptoms caused by the virus, but the food.
Vasnetsova posted a photo on Thursday (3 February) of what she said was five days of breakfast, lunch and dinner. Photos show a lunch box containing plain pasta, orange sauce, some charred meat on the bones, some potatoes, and no green vegetables.
Vasnetsova said she mainly survived on the few Italian pasta pieces because she could not eat anything else. She has lost a lot of weight and her bones have stood out.
After the observations, Vasnetsova concluded that the food that the athletes in the quarantine hotels received was generally poor.
"I really don't understand why we athletes are treated like this!" she wrote.
Russia's biathlon team spokesman Sergei Averyanov said Vasnetsova's diet improved somewhat after her revelations about her quarantine conditions, according to the Associated Press.
News (17)
German Olympic team leader: Isolation room conditions are unacceptable
Quarantine hotels are increasingly the target of criticism from athletes and their teams, who are lobbying organizers for improvements. There was also a lack of transparency throughout the quarantine, with some athletes who tested positive for the virus being forced into quarantine hotels that their teams were unable to access, while other teammates in similar situations were allowed to quarantine inside the Olympic Village.
Athlete teams have begun to publicly criticize poor quarantine conditions.
German delegation chief Dirk Schimmelpfennig slammed after three-time Olympic gold medalist Eric Frenzel tested positive and was quarantined "Unreasonable" isolation conditions.
Schmelpfenni said conditions in the isolation room in Franzelle were "unacceptable". He told reporters that the conditions of the isolation room did not meet the standards of athletes and teams, whether it was in terms of cleanliness, food quality and WiFi.
He said the German team was working to improve the isolation conditions of the three confirmed athletes, including close talks with the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the Beijing Olympic Organizing Committee at the operational and political levels to improve.
"Segregated hotel rooms (conditions) are unacceptable and have to change," he said.
The room must be large enough for athletes to exercise, and it must be hygienic, Schmelpfenni said. Food needs to be delivered regularly. "PCR testing should be done when we need it, twice a day."
Schmelpfennier also said in comments reported by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) that only if these conditions are met will the athletes who are eventually released from quarantine remain in good condition and be able to compete.
News (18)
Belgian players cry: Worry about not going back to the Olympic Village
Belgian player Kim Meylemans also criticized the conditions of the quarantine hotel. The tearful video posted by Melemans on social media drew attention to the quarantine conditions. Mailmans felt a lack of information on quarantine hotels. She worries that she will not be able to go back to the Olympic Village.
"Our main goal is to get Kim Melemans back to the Yanqing Olympic Village as soon as possible," Belgian Olympic official Olav Spahl said on Wednesday (2 February). "So we are happy that we have now succeeded. achieved this goal.”
Spall also said that while understanding covid restriction measures are necessary to keep competition participants safe and healthy, the athlete should always be the focus of care when implementing this approach.
Since 23 January 2022, more than 350 Olympic participants, including athletes, staff and the media, have tested positive upon arrival in Beijing. A confirmed athlete must not be released from isolation until they are asymptomatic and have two negative PCR tests 24 hours apart.
"The number of positive tests and the number of close contacts is at its peak. This is clearly an organizational issue for BOCOG and the International Olympic Committee," said German delegation head Schmelpfennier.
News (19)
Winter Olympics use Uyghur to light the torch, causing the outside world to focus on human rights in Xinjiang
Image : Dinigeer Yilamujiang (left) and Zhao Jiawen light the main torch at the opening ceremony of the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing on 4 February 2022. (Antonin Thuillier/AFP via Getty Images)
The 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics opened on Friday (4 February). The CCP has sparked heated debate by claiming that it has selected an athlete of Uyghur descent to light the Olympic torch at the opening ceremony. Human rights groups say the CCP's "human rights violations cannot be whitewashed by sports".
Dinigeer Yilamujiang, 20, is from the Altay region of Xinjiang in western China. Her selection as one of the last two torchbearers comes amid a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Olympics by many Western countries over the CCP's persecution of Uighurs and members of other Muslim minorities.
Organizations such as the United Nations and Human Rights Watch have said that the CCP Chinese authorities have held as many as 1 million Uyghur Muslims in concentration camps in Xinjiang, where they are subjected to abuse and rights violations.
“Detainees and prisoners are subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, cultural and political indoctrination, and forced labor,” Human Rights Watch said.
In the final days of Donald Trump's presidency, the U.S. State Department officially determined that China's crackdown on Uyghurs constituted a crime of "genocide."
Before the opening of the Beijing Olympics, the White House was the first to announce a diplomatic boycott, citing the Chinese government's "ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity." Other countries such as Australia and the United Kingdom have followed suit and taken similar actions.
The CCP denied all allegations of persecution of Uyghurs, and later changed its name to the concentration camps as “re-education camps.”
"Human rights violations cannot be washed away by sport," Amnesty International tweeted on Friday.
The International Olympic Committee said Yilamujiang's race had nothing to do with her selection.
News (20)
Former Amnesty International analyst: Evidence of CCP human rights abuses is overwhelming
Best-selling author Dan Wetzel wrote in a Yahoo op-ed that the Chinese Communist Party’s choice of the Uyghur female athlete as the torchbearer is a direct response to outside groups and governments who accuse her of human rights abuses, "At a landmark moment in the Olympics, the Chinese Communist Party dispatched a Uighur girl to a domestic and global audience, essentially declaring that "everything is normal, and what you hear is not true."
Amnesty International noted in 2021 that Uyghurs in Xinjiang, like others in the region, "face systematic, state-organized mass incarceration, torture and persecution that constitute crimes against humanity".
However, Wetzel pointed out that if the CCP uses Yilamujiang as a prop for its "good storytelling", then let her also become an opportunity for the rest of the world to understand what is happening in Xinjiang.
While governments, independent groups, and international journalists recognize the enormous risks of confronting the CCP, whether politically, economically, or even for security reasons, they have reached a consensus on "Xinjiang":
One million Uyghurs are held by the CCP in concentration camps — what the CCP calls re-education camps — forced labor, forced sterilization, rape, beating, forced abortion, starvation, and every other torture imaginable.
"The evidence is overwhelming," Williams Nee, a former analyst at Amnesty International and of the Chinese Human Rights Defenders group, told Yahoo Sports.
China denies this but has also refused to allow the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to travel to Xinjiang to investigate. Wetzel, however, pointed to satellite imagery of the camps, testimonies of Uighurs who fled as refugees, and reports from independent groups and investigative journalists to corroborate what Amnesty International said.
News (21)
Dan Wetzel: The CCP is stung by the diplomatic boycotts of various countries
Wetzel called for the Chinese Communist Party's propaganda to be counterproductive to draw attention to this state terrorism and make it a global movement.
"They want the IOC to send the message: This is not about politics; then make it all about politics," Ni said. "They want to show their people and the world, especially the Muslim world, a moral harmony image but you can't say everything is fine without letting the UN, or anyone else, come in and investigate."
Wetzel pointed out that this is why the United States and other countries have carried out a "diplomatic boycott" of the Beijing Winter Olympics. Without U.S. government officials there to witness, there would be no endorsement of such a large-scale brainwashing by the CCP.
Wetzel further pointed out that, however, the fact that the Yilamujiang lighting the torch shows that the CCP has been stung by the diplomatic boycott of various countries. Beijing was annoyed that the US, Britain and other dignitaries were not present at the opening ceremony on Friday.
[Fang Fei Interview] Yan Limeng: Tracing the Origin of SARS-CoV-2 and Pursuing the CCP's Responsibility (Part 2)
Image : Interview with Yan Limeng: Unremittingly expose the truth of the virus and hold the CCP accountable. (Provided by Fang Fei Interview)
Hello viewers, welcome to this issue of [Fang Fei Interview].
Ms. Yan Limeng, a former postdoctoral researcher at the University of Hong Kong, may be one of the first medical experts outside Wuhan to be exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (CCP virus, covi) and conduct research on it. Her research led her to doubt the origin of the virus, and in late January 2020 she began secretly breaking news overseas.
She fled Hong Kong in April 2020, and overseas she began to call on the world more broadly to hold the CCP accountable. She believes that the virus is a biological weapon developed by the CCP, and that the CCP also covered up the truth of the virus in every possible way, which led to the outbreak of the plague in the world.
Because of her efforts, she has also been continuously harassed and threatened by the CCP. This program is very pleased to invite Dr. Yan Limeng to tell us about her experience and her research on virus tracing.
News (22)
The CCP collects various viruses all over the world and also has a five-year plan
Moderator: According to your understanding, because you have always been in this industry, you also know very well that the CCP has spared no effort to collect various viruses all over the world, right?
Yan Limeng: Look, in China, if you go to read the documents of the CCP, including the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, led by Director Gao Fu, we posted a bidding document of them on the Internet before, that is, they took a lot of money, and then a multicenter survey.
From 2010 to 2015, in this five-year plan, they have a combination of laboratories across the country, the purpose is to find this new type of animal that has not been found before, such as bats, mice or other wild animals. these viruses.
Then they emphasized that these viruses should include, for example, dengue virus, Zika virus, hemorrhagic fever virus, or pathogens, not necessarily the whole virus, and hemorrhagic fever can also be bacteria. It also includes this Ebola, covi and influenza virus. It must include all of them, and then he will find these dangerous viruses. This clear statement to you is that we need to know the potential hazards.
But can he handle it? This is a question. Secondly, he has a small requirement in it, that is, he said one of them. We especially want to know whether there are neurotoxic viruses. It is best to have two or three new effects every year. This new type of pathogen that affects the nerves, affects the brain, affects the nervous system has been discovered.
In fact, later we saw this coronavirus, just this Zhoushan bat virus, after they published it, they did some experiments after finding it, and published that there are some characteristics in this virus, which can potentially cause a threat to human public health. So what is included here? Including an experiment, he confirmed that there is potential neurotoxicity. They infected the mouse baby, and then the brain of the mouse baby was checked and there was inflammation. So this look is a perfect fit for what they want.
As for the CCP, it seeks viruses both domestically and overseas. Why do I say this? Because like my laboratory in Hong Kong, this laboratory is actually a huge bridge of communication between the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese military, and the overseas academic community.
Especially the coronavirus, when you look at SARS-1, you look like Professor Guan Yi, as well as my two bosses Malik, Leo Poon, and Yuen Guoyong, all of them are experts in our laboratory, right, so he is right. The understanding of coronavirus is much deeper than that of ordinary laboratories, and at the same time, when the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) appeared later, our laboratory also bore the brunt of experiments, and my husband was one of the main experts. So our research on this is very deep.
As for the whole world, we know about some related animals, such as the Middle East, Egypt, camels or local animals. They also have this project, the World Health Organization. To see if there are other potential animal viruses, these things will be sent. We are here, then we have a huge library of such natural virus samples. In that case, the Chinese government and military have used various communication methods and various integrations, and it can be used.
That is to say, China's knowledge and resources are very powerful in this regard. At the same time, you can see that last year, Xi Jinping also participated in the Convention on Biological Diversity in Kunming. For this opportunity of the United Nations' Convention on the Protection of Biological Diversity, he actually proposed that China should give 1.5 billion RMB put it in first, and then support all scientists around the world, from plant samples to animal samples, microbial samples, and human samples, We're going to share what we're going to take advantage of.
This is also a way for them to collect this diversity of genes on a large scale, as well as to collect this emerging pathogen or biological weapon material.
News (23)
The CCP’s information war: The Lancet’s joint article suppresses the discussion of the unnatural origin of the virus
Moderator: I think this sounds scary. In fact, in general, it is human beings who are studying viruses. In many aspects, I think they are taking a very dangerous road. The CCP is even more extraordinary in this way. Human beings are doing this kind of research. This is really a scary thing.
I think we will talk about it next. You mentioned that the CCP's one is false information, and the other is its infiltration into international organizations. It was in February 2020, when you were still in Hong Kong. In fact, there was an article published in The Lancet, and it was signed by 27 experts, right? Later, it was said that Daszak was discovered organizing by one hand, the article basically suppressed all discussions in the scientific community that this virus might have an unnatural origin.
So I was very impressed with the article at that time. We were still discussing it on the show at that time, saying that the article itself had nothing, almost nothing scientific, even for people who did not understand science, it was a kind of a position of an article that expresses a political position.
However that article played a big role. One is that you were in Hong Kong at the time. How did you feel after reading the article? The other is, do you also understand that there is such a collusion with the CCP behind it?
Yan Limeng: That's right, this article was actually what they said at the time. Why was it released in a hurry in February? You have to know that in February, there were only two voices in the world, and what some people heard was that regarding the source question, the first one is that since 19 January, I have been continuously breaking the news through the Lude Press, telling everyone that this is from the military, and presenting the evidence of this gene comparison.
Then the other one was around 27 January 2020. On 29 January 2020, scientists in India published an article and posted it on the preprinted website. Then, at that time, they said that they did some analysis and felt that there were unusual, seems to be some sequences inserted by HIV and others but their article was actually withdrawn very quickly, because they were under great pressure, so because the article has been withdrawn, in theory, it will not cause much shock in the scientific community.
But this article by Daszak, if you look at Daszak and him later, didn't some of his emails have been exposed by the relevant agencies in the United States? He actually started to write this article in the first week of February, that is, around 23 January when he began to receive assignments.
Then he spent about a week, and his people, he did not specify who, after they went to write a first draft, from 1 to 3 February, he started sending emails to other scientists, said who wanted to sign or not, and then he searched for a list of a bunch of people, and among them, including me, or my two bosses, Malik and Leo Poon, were all on the invited list.
Then I can actually say that when I was in Hong Kong, I had the opportunity to see this email, the invitation email. But Malik is very much like this. How should I put it, because he is very, very deeply involved in this matter, and he knows too much. So in this matter, he chose to avoid signing very wisely at the time.
But Leo Poon, my other boss, signed this name. When this article was published, I immediately contacted Mr. Luther. I told him that this article must be exposed and told everyone that there was something wrong with the article.
They published this article at the time because after watching the Lude program, the CCP knew that it would cause a series of reactions, and it needed to block the mouth. This is what you see when we exposed this Zhoushan bat on 19 January. After the virus was the source, Shi Zhengli submitted her RaTG13 article the next day.
Then within a week, they started organizing this article to fight back, trying to silence all voices about this unnatural source, which they called a conspiracy theory, and stood firmly on the side of the CCP. The CCP, like I said, has actually prepared this disinformation for a long time but it will choose a suitable time to release it. You know, as I said, our laboratory discovered it first.
So you see, the task of finding raccoon dogs falls on us, right, and then our laboratory also provided rapid test kits to the World Health Organization during SARS. What we did at the time was that, like Professor Leo Poon, they became famous because of this.
Therefore, during the epidemic, the rapid test kit of the World Health Organization was also provided by us. So you see in this behavioral pattern, Shi Zhengli is the one who discovered SARS-CoV, the bat source of the SARS virus, then she will discover the bat source of the SARS-CoV-2, you understand the logic ? However, Shi Zhengli was obviously not prepared to report this so early.
Because if you think about it, if nothing happened on 20 January 2020, the CCP still does not admit human-to-human transmission, so she obviously could not have thrown this bat virus out so quickly and told everyone that she found the source, right wrong. So she was in a very flustered situation, so that she and Zhang Yongzhen, that is, Professor Zhang Yongzhen from Shanghai, had conflicting results, and they both published in the journal "Nature" at the same time.
Zhang Yongzhen said that according to the existing clues, we found that it should be a family with Zhoushan bat virus, although he did not say that this was from Zhoushan bat virus, because he did not provide evidence of this genetic modification but Shi Zhengli published it on the same day and said, "Hey, we just found this ten-year-old specimen from the lab drawer. Fortunately, this is the source of SARS-CoV-2."
You see, the CCP was in a mess at that time, so its series of follow-up actions were actually based on this. After we broke the news at the time, it was triggered by it, including its admission of human-to-human transmission, and it began to do things like Wuhan’s lockdown. So the CCP prepared a lot of things, and then because the timing came out, it did not act according to their plan, so they gave it to a lot of people. For example, you were very sensitive to capture it at the time, eh, this thing is wrong, it did it too deliberately , and then left a lot of evidence to the world step by step.
News (24)
Tricky to deduce the accident at the Mojiang Copper Mine in Yunnan as the possibility of laboratory leakage
Moderator: Yes, although the publication of that article was temporarily suppressed for a while, it is true that in the next one or two years, more and more information and more and more people are chasing after it, including folks like this DRASTIC. Traceability organizations are chasing it, because everyone finds that there are many things that are not right.
Well, in my impression, the "Wall Street Journal" also published some articles later, so because you mentioned Shi Zhengli's RaTG13 virus, there was a time in the middle, the media reported this incident in the Mojiang Copper Mine in Yunnan, in 2012. When Shi was in Mojiang Copper Mine, an incident occurred, which resulted in the infection of six miners and the death of three miners. Later, this kind of organization from overseas was excavated, and it was after the fact that someone in China wrote a paper there. It is specifically about the incident that led to the death of the miners, so a lot of information is mentioned in this paper. For example, a person from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who came to the Mojiang Copper Mine, collected samples of the virus, and later several different new coronaviruses have been discovered.
Well, there is a virus among them. The outside world thinks that it is very similar to Shi Zhengli's RaTG13, so Shi Zhengli quickly said that those two are actually the same virus, so now the outside world has a kind of doubt, that is, whether she put this virus at that time. The covi is taken to the laboratory for analysis, and even some functional gain-of-function research is being conducted. In the process, the virus leaks from the laboratory, and the outside world is also saying whether there is such a possibility.
Yan Limeng: Yes, first of all I have to say this. You know this incident in great detail. It can be seen that you have done this homework very seriously, but in fact, it is one, and it is a very tricky and complicated story. Then it is a story for everyone to listen to. It is really similar. Even if you are a biologist or virologist, like a considerable number of scientists in DRASTIC who are doing research seriously, then everyone will think, something like this happened.
But what I want to tell you is that, first, there is evidence that RaTG13 does not exist. This evidence includes the evidence that Shi Zhengli told others, as well as this my report and my second Yan report. Through scientific analysis of genes , which proves that this is a paradox. If SARS-CoV-2 exists naturally in the world, then we know that it exists naturally in the world, right?
News (25)
RaTG13 is man-made pseudovirus
Then the conclusion is that through the comparison of this gene and the comparison of this frequency, we have no way to see that this RaTG13 is a virus that exists in nature, that is to say, it can only be a pseudovirus that exists in man-made. It is impossible to appear from this evolutionary point of view, such a situation.
Then again, I want to talk about the story of Mojiang. In fact, it is a very interesting story. Most of the things in it are right, but one important point is that in this Mojiang incident, half of the six miners died at that time, and it did not either because, or there is no conclusive proof that it was caused by the coronavirus, and in fact, the inspection at that time was because I also read the materials at that time, including this master's thesis, because the master was from Kunming, and their tube bed The master's thesis written by the doctor, I am a doctor myself, and I have read this master's degree. I know that the information in the doctor's hand is the most comprehensive and accurate in this case.
News (26)
Yan Limeng: One of the dead Mojiang miners has cancer
Because he wants to ensure that the quality of his master's thesis is high, right? Then he presents it here, that is, these patients are first of all, they are not contagious, there is no such high contagiousness. Then they go into the hole to do things. There are many factors in it. It can be some factors of inhalation because the hole is very dirty, including dust, mold, virus, and these metabolites. The miners inhaled and died. They either stayed there for a long time, or they already had underlying diseases. I have the impression that one of them had cancer, if I remember correctly.
News (27)
Yan Limeng: No sample to prove existence of coronavirus from the Mojiang mine despite PCR
We analyzed at that time, I analyzed all the data in his laboratory and so on, and finally including their conclusion, they were sending samples from patients at that time, and there was a suspicion that this coronavirus was sent to Zhong Nanshan, and all staff of the Wuhan virus institute have looked at the sample. Zhong Nanshan had a consultation, and then both the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Chengdu received the sample for testing but first of all, there is no sample to prove that there is a coronavirus in it, that is, it does not exist. Like we said, doing this PCR found that there is a virus but it does not exist.
Then secondly, there is no long-term antibody IgG in these patients. He said in the middle that it is the antibody of IgM. From a professional point of view, I can say that this result is a strong false positive. In fact, it is other things, including whether we look at its infectiousness, whether we look at its symptoms, or whether we look at its follow-up performance, it does not support this as a coronavirus.
For these patients at that time, the biggest and final doctor's judgment was that the most likely cause of this kind of aspiration pneumonia, and then some of them were due to a large number of fungal infections, so he could not get timely treatment, and then he died.
News (28)
Shi Zhengli brought back mouse feces and claims she found covi, the sequence of 4991
So the example of the virus itself is actually not what the outside world said. Shi Zhengli brought back a lot of samples, such as mouse feces. She did not find a complete new type of coronavirus in it. She found it. An interesting thing? It was she who found one. We can understand that the achievement is the small tail of the covi. There is a piece of the new covi. It is indeed the sequence of 4991. It comes from the fact that they found this sample from this mine. She did not find the complete virus. She did not even know if it was a virus close to SARS because she only found this piece but what is the use of this one?
News (29)
Yan Limeng: The site of 4991 or the enzyme RdRp is target for drug use
This piece can be spliced into this covi to replace the Zhoushan bat virus, this is called RdRp, it is an enzyme, and this enzyme has a special function, that is, if you know the coronavirus, you can know you. At this time of research and development, if you want a drug, then this site of 4991, which is actually being developed by the industry now, is a target for drug use.
Remdesivir uses this part as a target. It is a good thing for them. Then I get a little tail like this 4991. I know this tail is very unique. If you put it on when you're making a biological weapon, then, theoretically, he'll think it's easier for him to get an antidote, right?
Moderator: So you say, when they get something, they can use it anyway, and use it for research?
Yan Limeng: Yes, it was used. That's why I said that the army's project found this live virus at the time. They were very happy, and if you look at the team that was found at that time, it was the People's Liberation Army of the Nanjing Military Region. Wang Changjun of the China CDC. He has now been transferred to the Minister of Health Services of the PLA General Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and he has been promoted.
This thing can completely separate this, and then cultivate it, and then let you get this foundation to transform, which is a very difficult thing. According to Shi Zhengli's own admission over the years, when she was looking for the ancestors of SARS, she should have found two or three.
Whether this is really found we will not talk about it for the time being, but after looking for other new viruses in this matter, she did not succeed in finding covi but the accumulated knowledge and samples are true.
News (30)
Biden's 90-day source tracing report is just the beginning, and it is a process for many experts to understand the CCP
Moderator: This topic is going to continue like this. I think you are teaching us a class and a scientific research class, so let's stop here for the time being. This discussion about viruses and targets is here first. I would like to ask what you think is that after the Biden administration of the United States came to power, didn't he ask the intelligence agencies to conduct a 90-day traceability investigation? Finally a report came out. Then the conclusion of this report is that I think he has made a progress, that is, he has raised the laboratory leakage as one of the possibilities.
However his report was inconclusive, and he said "we don't know right now". Then I want to ask a question, what do you think of the conclusion of such a report? Do you think he really can only draw such a conclusion, or are there many political factors that prevent him from drawing a larger conclusion? This is one, and the other is a conclusion. Does it mean that the U.S. government is limited in what the U.S. government can do to trace the source of the virus?
Yan Limeng: No, this does not mean that they have stopped here, it is just a phased report. Because Biden is on stage, everyone is concerned about SARS-CoV-2 (covi) and COVID-19, and he must make such a report. You can see that in March, the WHO went to China to conduct a so-called joint investigation. After it came out, the whole world was in an uproar, right? That report is really inappropriate, so the United States, as a leading power, must also take such a step.
But you need to know the origin of covi. First of all, when we study many things as experts from the United States, the first thing they invite these experts, because I have contact with many of them who are investigating this, so they also I'll tell you that they'll include people like Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric (Professor of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina).
That is to say, because when you first started the investigation at that time, as the United States, it was a country with a rule of law, then based on the identities of these people and the qualifications of these people, he was bound to get these people into their committees. Right.
Otherwise they'll call you unfair, right? In the course of this investigation, some other evidence collections were gradually included, including the exposure of Daszak's information, including Fauci's emails. These are all rounds that require non-stop rounds, that is, I can tell you that I have some communication with them with investigative reporters.
When they submit an email requesting disclosure, the other party will reply, and if you find a lawyer, they will tell you that you do not want to disclose it, and it will take time for you to go back and forth. So before Biden's 90-day results, the investigation they can actually do is relatively limited.
In this process, they were able to bring the laboratory source to the table, which is already a huge progress relative to 2020. Because you have to know that this report was published in September 2021. When I published my first report in September 2020 and stated that this was a laboratory source, it caused an uproar all over the world. The whole world is reporting on this but the next year a Biden administration can already produce this report.
Of course, what it mentioned in this report is very vague. Why does it say that? Because first of all this public opinion, it has to wait until the public opinion gradually begins to recognize it, and some things can be said more deeply. Then the second is that you have to know that in the process of this investigation, it still has a convention that it has a tendency to be, I asked 10 experts, because the investigator is not an expert, right?
Then I asked 10 experts, most of the 10 experts held this opinion, and a small number held that opinion. Then I have to react to this. I can't say it directly. Although most people think it may come from a leak, but a small number of people think it is a biological weapon, I think it is a biological weapon. There is no way for you to explain this directly, and you still have a lot of intermediate steps to get through.
Then you have to know that the scientists who are the main force of the investigation in the United States, put aside those who stand with the CCP, among the remaining scientists, they actually do not have such an in-depth understanding of the CCP. He can't read the information in Chinese. For example, we talked about the Mojiang River in Yunnan just now. You also mentioned it.
There are student papers in Mojiang, Yunnan, right? This student thesis is written in Chinese. When I met with a professor at the NIH where they conducted the survey, he told me he had read that paper too but he is very strange. He said that many places in the translation are very strange. We just found out as a couple that the translation, for example, about having a nodule the size of a corn kernel in the lungs, they translated it into a nodule the size of a particle.
Let's just say you look at this translation, it will completely affect their detailed judgment, right? So in this case, they don't understand the CCP, they don't understand military-civilian integration, and they are also disturbed by some information. Then he can only consider: I think this is not from nature, it should come from the laboratory but how does it come out?
He can only say, "Oh, that's from the laboratory, we think the laboratory leak sounds the most reliable, right?" If he is not Chinese, if he goes to say this, the CCP will immediately detain him with an anti-China rating Hat, a hat that discriminates against Asians. The power of this political correctness is great.
News (31)
Continue to push forward on the issue of covi tracing and covid accountability to the CCP
Moderator: Yes, so that means that you will continue to push forward on the issue of virus tracing and accountability to the CCP. Are you still optimistic?
Yan Limeng: I am very optimistic. Because I am the one who is advancing, I am not one sitting outside and watching from the sidelines. I can see the people from last July, 2020, when I first talked about the collusion between the CCP and WHO on Fox, the people said, oh, how could this be the case. Then Fox's feedback said, this is world-beating news, but now do you think who would think this is a strange thing? I tell everyone about Fauci, do you think people are still curious now?
News (32)
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Chinese Communist Party are collaborating
Moderator: You said that you went on Fox to say that the WHO and the CCP colluded. Did you have any solid evidence at the time, or did you know some specific exchanges between Dazaq and the CCP?
Yan Limeng: The collusion between the WHO and the CCP is because our laboratory is the reference laboratory of the WHO. My two bosses in our lab and these other professors I often get along with are experts in this area of the WHO, including my husband who is also a WHO expert on Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Then, when I continued to report this information to the WHO from 31 December 2019, they did not inform the whole world about it in the way that it should be handled through normal channels to do early warning and epidemic prevention. On the contrary, they and the CCP believe that there is no human-to-human transmission, and my mentor Leo Poon clearly warned me on 16 January 2020 that if I were not careful, I will disappear and no one can help me.
Including the letter to Daszak, their joint signatures and so on, and then standing in the CNN interview, they continued to say that this is from nature, and we know that it must come from nature. So all this is evidence that the WHO colluded with the CCP to cover up.
Moderator: Yes, do you think one of the reasons he said this is also because he did not want to affect this so-called gain-of-function research? He hopes to keep getting funding to do this kind of research.
Yan Limeng: There is one reason for this, because this research on functional enhancement is actually subject to strict supervision and strict control. While in China, including our laboratory, it was Hong Kong, but it was also influenced by the CCP. These professors will do some illegal experiments, and then secret experiments, which are very dangerous. Not to mention in the CCP, he dares to do anything.
They are definitely reluctant to say these things, because first of all, they think that as long as it is a man-made situation, the virologist who bears the brunt will be pressured by the public, right? And secondly, everyone knows that the CCP will not let you speak.
Then it is obvious that the scientific community has also been bought by the CCP, so I won't let you talk about it. And if you don't say it, then the benefits are huge. You become famous, you get promoted, you get money to do scientific research, and you can participate in the research and development of vaccines, right?
Then these interests have been further bound, and they are not willing to destroy this vested interest, nor are they willing to push themselves to the opposite of all their peers. It is also like this in pharmaceutical companies, and it has this kind of political correctness. After these professors signed a contract with the pharmaceutical company as a consultant, some of them told me that he would sign a non-disclosure agreement and a stake-related agreement.
You cannot say something that makes them unhappy, or he will sue you. Then these are the real dangers that they will face, including if you can't post an article, then you're doing it in vain. So after they have thought about these things, some people are bought by the CCP, and some people come back to the team automatically.
News (33)
Yan is optimistic about holding the CCP accountable because evil can never prevail
Moderator: Yes, so the conscience of scientists is very important, so this is another factor, that is, the CCP is constantly bribing, and many people, including many, are indeed standing with the CCP for their own interests. In the face of so much resistance, why are you still so optimistic about tracing the origin of the virus and holding the CCP accountable?
Yan Limeng: Because I think this thing is evil or not, it's as simple as that. I'll be honest. I didn't know at first that things would turn out this way. From the moment I decided to break the news, I thought I would disappear because I was in Hong Kong and I saw how they disappear young people in Hong Kong, right. It doesn't matter whether the person fell directly or floated directly to the sea. In short, the police can open their eyes and talk nonsense with the government, alas, this is suicide.
It is especially willing to commit suicide without wearing clothes and leave a suicide note, and we all know this situation. But if I wanted to pass the news out, it was just an idea. Like I said, this matter, whether as a doctor or a virologist, I saw it happened, and I was able to judge it. The next trend is we have to find a way to stop it.
In this process, all I want is that when the message is delivered, I am not lost, and the message can be delivered completely and effectively. At the time, it was my goal. But after this thing went out, I was very lucky, I am still alive and I continue to see that they are constantly doing evil, including the CCP's lockdown of the city (Wuhan), and then it spreads the virus to the world on a large scale at the same time.
Including the inhumane things they did in Wuhan, including their silence in the scientific community, repression and dissemination of false information. Then I can't just sit there and watch, and I'm definitely going to expose it further.
That includes encountering a clear threat to life step by step, and it is also very important to go to the United States and help the American people realize this kind of false information created by the CCP using language and cultural communication. When there is a lot of resistance along the way, I can often see some tangible gains and some hope.
Including the feedback from the public, including the feedback from the relevant departments, including the media, there are always many good people, which gives me great confidence. So I firmly believe that if we do the right thing, we should not be afraid, and then God is protecting us, so it is carried out step by step.
News (34)
The anti-extradition movement in Hong Kong shocked Yan greatly, and she has a clearer understanding of the evil of the CCP
Moderator: Yes, I think you really have a special historical mission. On the one hand you have this knowledge and on the other hand you have this courage and bravery, so it's really unique to do this. You mentioned Hong Kong just now. In fact, you witnessed the kind of march of one million people in Hong Kong in 2019, and how the Hong Kong police treated them was to witness the whole process. So how exactly do these things motivate and influence you? Talk to us again.
Yan Limeng: This is really very, very shocking. First of all, I would like to thank many brave media, including The Epoch Times, NTDTV, and of course Apple News, and then stand news that was blocked some time ago, as well as many, many brave independent journalists who rushed to the front to send us news back to these reports.
What I want to say is that as a native of mainland China, including those who received doctoral education there, it had been 7 years since I went to Hong Kong, but when I faced such a large-scale protest, my first response is what I can do. As far as you know the CCP is bad, it does not care about the people, it does not care about freedom.
But at that time, I thought that I had already arrived in Hong Kong from the mainland, and I was already a Hong Kong identity, so it should be no problem. What do they have to do with me? When you see that the CCP has really stretched its claws, it can destroy the stable and thriving international metropolis in your mind overnight.
Then, when you see Hong Kong people supporting the elderly and bringing the young and big in the summer, they go to Causeway Bay and go to Wanchai to demonstrate and protest, and I also want to participate but I was really, first of all during a few big protests, and I just happened to have work and other things that I couldn't attend.
The other thing is that when I want to participate in those little (parades), I even think what should I do? Is it useful for me to go to the street like this? What slogan am I going to shout? Then after I go, will the government respond? I spent a lot of time thinking about these things, you know? This incident made me feel that as people who grew up in the mainland, you have to take the first step in the struggle, which is not easy.
You have absolutely no idea of the struggle of equality and democracy, and you are also very afraid. Including my family in the mainland, I didn’t dare to casually post on Facebook at that time, and I didn’t even say obvious things on WeChat at that time, because you know this is a very scary thing.
But the people of Hong Kong are like this. He is not afraid. When they were subjected to such great repression and unfair treatment, they still insisted. This impacted me too much. Including the fact that I have always said that from children to the elderly, that is, the elderly in their seventies and eighties, I still have to say it again. I believe that you knew when someone reported it at the time.
Moderator: Yes, very moved.
Yan Limeng: Whether it's Granny Wang, or other elderly people you don't know at all, they may be people sitting on the side of the road and basking in the sun. But at this time, he rushed to the front line to block in front of the young man, just to delay the policeman's footsteps.
They said that when they were young they did nothing, they mistrusted the CCP. As a result, now raising tigers is a problem, and the CCP comes to harm their next generation. They can only do this thing and use their own bodies to resist it. So what can we do? If we don't do it now, there may be no future problems for the next generation in the future.
So when all these things slowly accumulated in my heart, including my view of the evil of the CCP, through your related media and self-media like Lutheran, my understanding of the CCP deepened step by step. . And without your reports and perseverance, and without the perseverance and struggle of the Lude media, I would have felt very disappointed at that time.
This is a real experience, which is a normal human psychological reaction. But because of the unyielding persistence of all these people, the role of unity and struggle gave me confidence, and then it also made me stronger step by step to recognize this matter. That is to say, later, when I personally encountered the investigation of the Wuhan virus, and when I discovered these things, I would not hesitate at that time.
What I thought was how to transmit information in this state, how to maximize the effect of this information, and how to most effectively prevent the CCP's evil actions.
Moderator: Wow, so the Hong Kong people's protest actually planted this seed in your heart, and then at the right time, I think it will blossom and bear fruit. So this is also quite encouraging, that is to say, although we have seen that Hong Kong has been ruthlessly suppressed by the CCP, it can even be said that it has been destroyed to a certain extent. But its after-effect, the result and impact it has produced in people's minds may be unpredictable.
Yan Limeng: Yes, you are like a Hong Konger. The most obvious thing he said is to be water, and then the brothers climb the mountain, right? Then you are the media, and you use your methods to convey the truth and help everyone. Then the students in Hong Kong used their own methods. They took the pot and poured the incendiary bomb over it and covered it with mineral water. They were on the front line of life and death threats, but he protected a lot of people and protected them. environment.
And what about me? I couldn't do anything at that time. But when I saw the virus, I realized what I could do, I realized what I could expose, so I would stand up at this time. So all of us are using our own ways to pass on such a force, including on Twitter, including your safe chat, including other situations, including many friends who have never met online, to help us spread.
So we know that there are many, many people like this, and we are also very moved, each of us is be water. Then if we don't do it, we're sitting still.
News (35)
Yan Limeng shows evil can never overcome righteousness
Moderator: Yes, that's right. That is, everyone should do the right thing, as you said, evil can never overcome righteousness. Thank you very much Dr. Yan Limeng. I think it is really inspiring to have such an interview with you today. I know our viewers, many of whom admire your courage and bravery, and wish you to stay safe.
Yan Limeng: Yes, thank you, Ms. Fang Fei. I am also very grateful to your platform for providing this opportunity, as if we have discussed some scientific research things in depth today. But because if we don't touch on this topic, the CCP will salivate by saying that you, Yan Limeng, have no evidence.
Let’s talk a little bit more, and everyone will be ok, so there is, but we haven’t had time to touch it yet. Interested friends can verify for themselves, and we are also happy to keep sharing a lot of what we are doing on Twitter, Lude and other media. Including the military's actions, the CCP's next steps for these disinformation and its plans, as well as some of our feedback and our opinions from all sides.
Moderator: Well, okay. We will also continue to pay attention, and if there is a chance, please come to our program to talk about more progress. Thank you very much Dr. Yan Limeng. Today our show is here first.
Yan Limeng: Okay, thank you, bye.
See also: https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/04/heavy-dr-yan-limeng-published-third.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/02/yan-limeng-chinese-academy-of-military.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2020/10/on-yan-limengs-second-report-on-origin.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2020/08/yan-limeng-pla-lab-purposefully.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2020/09/yan-limeng-removing-ccp-regime-is-only.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2020/09/latest-interview-with-yan-limeng-on-23.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/07/tedros-calls-for-audits-of-wuhan-labs.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/06/ccp-man-made-viruses-can-harm-humanity.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/05/shi-zhengli-teams-cover-up-on-bat.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/05/sellin-how-covid-outbreak-broke-out-in.html, https://staygate.blogspot.com/2021/05/wiv-ratg15-and-seven-other.html
No comments:
Post a Comment