News (1)
Forensic report: 68% of Dominion system error rate is deliberately designed
On Sunday (December 13), the Allied Security Operations Group announced a forensic report on 16 Dominion voting machines in Michigan. The conclusion is that the voting machine has an error rate of 68%, which is a deliberate design error that caused systematic vote fraud.
According to a US conservative news publication The National Pulse reported on December 14, the Joint Security Action Group published a forensic forensic report on Sunday that they found during inspection and observation that Antrim County, Michigan (Antrim County, Michigan) County)’s Dominion voting machine has an error rate of 68.05%, while the Federal Election Commission’s allowable election error rate is 1 in 250,000 (ie 0.0008%). The report said, "This shows that (the Dominion voting system) has a major fatal error in terms of security and election integrity."
The report also pointed out that the error of the Dominion voting system was not caused by improper operation of the staff, but by the system design and software of the voting machine itself. The system deliberately generated a large number of ballot statistics errors, and then handed over the electronic ballots to the adjudication process. Without supervision, transparency, and audit trails, this deliberately designed error allowed a large number of votes to enter the adjudication process, opening the door to large-scale fraud.
The Joint Security Action Team’s report reads, “We concluded that the Dominion voting system was deliberately and purposefully designed with inherent errors, which caused systematic fraud and affected the election results.”
The report also attached the full text of the test report issued by the Joint Security Action Group on December 13.
[The original report link of The National Pulse:
click here]
In this year’s U.S. election, election officials in Antrim County discovered that the Dominion voting machines they used had counted 6,000 votes for President Trump on the Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s Under the name. After the incident was exposed by the media, the public became suspicious of the possible systemic errors of the Dominion voting system. People are highly questioning: Have the Dominion voting machines used all over the United States transferred a large number of votes for Trump to Biden?
Left-wing media generally reported that this was a "small fault" and attributed it to errors caused by improper operation of the staff.
However, many key swing states, including Michigan, have been accused of various forms of election fraud after the election. At the same time, Antrim County exposed two other cases of vote counting errors, both of which were related to the Dominion voting machine.
According to a report by the American conservative website Gateway Pundit on December 12, people recounted the vote and found that the Central Lake Township Education Committee election held in Antrim County on November 6 The total number of votes given by the Dominion voting machine is 742 more than the actual number of votes; in an area with only 6 qualified voters, the total number of votes displayed by the Dominion voting machine is 663 votes, but in fact only 3 people in the area voted. It is believed that this phenomenon indicates that this special voting machine may be used by people with ulterior motives to illegally fill votes.
Matthew DePerno, a forensic attorney at DePerno Law, filed a lawsuit on behalf of William Bailey, a resident of Central Lake, and asked the court to allow the expert team to challenge Antrim. The tabulation machines, USB drives, related software, and clerks' master tabulation machines in 22 districts of the county conducted forensic investigations.
On the afternoon of December 4, Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer of the 13th Circuit Court of Appeals of Michigan approved William Bailey and his team of IT experts to challenge 16 Dominion voting machines in Antrim County. The tabulation machine, USB drive, related software, and the clerks' master tabulation machine were used for forensic research. A court order granted Bailey's team the power to conduct independent investigations of the images obtained during the inspection. The judge also ordered the destruction of data related to the 2020 election in the Dominion voting system.
A team of 7 well-trained judicial IT experts went to the ticket counting site in Antrim County to collect evidence on December 5. Eight hours later, the IT team brought 16 CF cards (similar to SIM cards), 16 USB drives and forensic images of the Dominion voting machine and other physical evidence, escorted to the airport by two Antrim County Sheriff’s cars and then left by plane.
A few days later, the IT expert team came up with the forensic evaluation results, but the Michigan Attorney General prohibited the team from disclosing these evaluation results to the outside world. The court also supported the attorney general's injunction on the grounds of involving "national security."
Last Friday (December 11), De Peno issued an urgent motion to Judge Elsenheimer, asking the court to lift the protective order that prohibited him from sharing the results of the inspection. De Peno reminded the judge that the deadline for electors to vote for the next president is December 14. He pointed out in the application that the Secretary of State of Michigan does not allow judicial testing of Dominion software on the grounds that the judicial testing violated the agreement between the state government and Dominion. However, the agreement presented by Antrim County shows that they have not signed the terms of the agreement that does not allow judicial testing.
[Gateway Pundit link to the original text:
click here]
News (2)
Amistad Project: Judges Should Order Preservation of Evidence of Voter Fraud Following Michigan Report
Reporter : Jack Philipps / Publisher : The Epoch Times
Following the release of a report from a company that performed an audit of voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan, the Amistad Project legal group said it will file a lawsuit in swing states to call on judges to “preserve evidence” of alleged voter fraud.
“We’re filing in all swing states a demand that judges step in and preserve evidence to avoid it from being destroyed or spoiled by the intentional or reckless acts of executive officials,” said Phill Kline, director of the Amistad Project, after the Allied Security Operations Group was allowed to release its report after an order issued by a Michigan judge. Kline tweeted that the court filings are intended to allow legislators to gain access to voter and election data to make a decision.
Allied, which said it carried out the forensic audit of the machines, and its co-founder Russell Ramsland wrote “the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
The report concluded: “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.”
Amistad cited findings from the forensic report (pdf) of the server for Antrim County on Dec. 6 that showed that of about 15,676 individual events, 10,667—or 68.5 percent—were considered errors.
“The error rate detailed in this report has implications for every state where we have litigation, and it comes on a day when officials are blocking legislators from having their say about elections in their states,” Kline said in a news release. “This joins with other compelling evidence that the elections in these states cannot be certified under the law.”
Michigan elections officials have since pushed back on the Allied Security report, suggesting that Allied Security is among several “shadowy organizations claiming expertise to throw around baseless claims of fraud in an effort to mislead American voters.”
Ramsland is a former GOP House candidate in Texas who worked under the Reagan administration. He was also formerly employed by NASA and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT.
Michigan Bureau of Elections Director Jonathan Brater, in a court filing over the weekend, added that “the report makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting.”
Meanwhile, Dominion also disputed the report in a statement to the Detroit Free Press on Monday and previously has said that its machines cannot switch votes from one candidate to another.
But the Amistad Project and Kline pointed to a Michigan Secretary of State directive (pdf) on Dec. 1 that instructs county clerks to delete electronic poll book files from laptops and USB drives. Amistad said it wants judges in swing states to issue emergency orders to prevent efforts to delete poll book data.
“In Michigan, the Secretary of State has ordered deletion of e-poll books and other evidence and also has taken affirmative steps to seal forensic evidence regarding the flaws in the operation of Dominion machines from both the public and from legislators who need access to this information in order to perform their constitutional duty,” Kline said on Monday. “This joins with the Michigan Attorney General threatening legislators with criminal investigation and possible prosecution if they disagree with her, and the Michigan Governor and other officials shutting down the peoples’ house and preventing them from gathering today to perform their constitutional duty.”
The Michigan GOP flagged the Dec. 1 memo as concerning.
“Secretary Benson’s move to request the deletion of election data amidst bipartisan calls for an audit is just another example of her putting partisan politics over what’s best for Michigan,” said Michigan Republican Party Chairman Laura Cox said in a statement on Dec. 4.
In a statement to The Epoch Times at the time, the Michigan Secretary of State’s office described the move to delete the data as routine.
A spokesperson said, “Electronic poll book data, which is removed after every election to safeguard personal identifying information, and is separately preserved on paper records, is not needed to conduct any reasonable type of audit that could conceivably be requested, because paper versions of the pollbook are always maintained and used for audits.”
Ref: https://www.theepochtimes.com/amistad-project-judges-should-order-preservation-of-evidence-of-voter-fraud-following-michigan-report_3618419.html
No comments:
Post a Comment