Host : Li Dayu / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/12/12/a103008042.html / Translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA
News (1)
The Supreme Court rejected the Texas appeal without expressing its position on the election. What happens next?
However, we got this result during the production of the program, which was very disappointing. The Supreme Court decided to reject the appeal of Texas.
As a result, we are inserted into the original content, inserted in this position.
Supreme Court conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito wrote in a short and unsigned submission: Texas is pointing out that other states operate elections. In terms of the way, no judicially identifiable interest is given. The two judges also pointed out that they have no right to reject a lawsuit filed by one state against another state on the original file, but they will not intervene in the issues raised by Texas and have no idea about any issues raised in the Texas lawsuit.
The left media NBC reported that in the history of the United States, there has never been a state appeal to cancel another state’s election results.
Previously, conservative legal experts generally expected that the Supreme Court would accept Texas’s appeal, but the Supreme Court’s decision was disappointing.
Now, is the next step. Does Trump have any other routes? Of course.
First of all, Texas is a state-to-state lawsuit concerning the outcome of the general election. The Supreme Court may not accept it because there is no similar precedent. However, there are still cases brought by lawyers in Arizona that support Trump and are going to the Supreme Court, and there are cases in Pennsylvania, and the Trump lawyer team is also preparing to go to the Supreme Court. There is no such obstacle as "no precedent" in these cases. Therefore, it is not ruled out that the Trump team and the lawyers who support them will push related other cases to the Supreme Court.
It just means that this may not prevent the Electoral College from voting on December 14 next Monday, but the Trump team has already issued a statement that the vote on December 14 does not mean the final result, at least until the new Congress verifies the result on January 6. . Therefore, Republican congressmen are also likely to continue to fight at the congressional level.
Of course, Trump has other options. Let's start with an incident.
News (2)
The Senate will hear Trump's first mention of "coup d'état": National dangerous moments
The chairman of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee and Republican Ron Johnson announced that the committee will hold a hearing on controversial issues in the general election next Wednesday, December 16. Look at it, everyone. This is the "Homeland Security" committee. It shows that the rationale for holding relevant hearings is not general. The significance is no longer limited to the United States, but involves national security issues, and may also be suspected of foreign powers.
US President Trump also posted nine tweets within an hour from 9 am to 10 am on December 10, mentioning the word "coup" for the first time.
In a series of tweets, he quoted his supporters as saying: Now is a very dangerous moment in our history. A coup is taking place before our eyes, and the public can no longer accept it.
Related analysis has always said that Trump can use foreign forces, such as the CCP's intervention, to activate martial law, and arrest those who participated in collaborating with the enemy and treason in the recent controversy in a military court for trial.
News (3)
FBI investigation of 500,000 fake tickets: Trump talks to Barr
On December 10, American talk show host Thomas Paine quoted a source as saying that he had received information from a federal government insider that the Department of Justice ordered the FBI to track a total of 500,000 copies involving four key states. Fake tickets, and the actual number may be more, these four states are also the four states that Texas is prosecuting. The reason for the actual action of the Department of Justice is that US President Trump talked to Barr, thinking that Barr did not do enough, saying that he did not do anything. In Chinese, it means "occupying the pit and not shit". Of course Trump is not. That’s what he said, but what he said was very hard, which made Barr a little unbearable. In the host’s original words, “Barr was so angry that he was shining like a Christmas tree.” But from the host’s introduction, Barr can feel that For Trump, it’s not the kind of rebellious person. The media said that he might resign before January 20 next year. It’s not that he is dissatisfied with Trump, but that if Trump does not do it, he will not do it. .
Anyway, after that conversation, it worked. Previously, the Department of Justice was investigating various isolated cases related to election disputes in different federal prosecutors' offices in different states. However, after that conversation, Attorney General Barr began to pressure the FBI, and the FBI investigated four key states. 500,000 fake votes, but the host Thomas Paine we mentioned just now also mentioned one thing, that is, the FBI group of people are aware of the virtues of the people. There has been such a little progress, but how to develop next? It is unpredictable.
News (4)
The leftist makes a big turn! The reason behind Biden may not be simple
There is another incident. I don’t know if it’s relevant to talk to the Attorney General with Trump. It was the scandal of Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden pitifully issued a statement on December 9 that he was notified by federal prosecutors on December 8 that he was under investigation due to tax and foreign transactions. There are also reports that Hunter Biden’s uncle James Biden is also under investigation.
The Wall Street Journal reported on December 10 that the Attorney General knew about Hunter Biden’s incidents as early as this spring, but did not take action. The reason is that the internal rules of the Department of Justice stipulate that before the general election., Don’t take excessive actions against people involved in the general election, otherwise you may be suspected of affecting the results of the general election. Because Hunter Biden is the son of the old Biden, if a traitor comes out of his family, then Biden will definitely be affected. What's more, according to the New York Post and related revelations, the old Biden himself is also in contact with the CCP. It plays an important role in the scandal of money transactions.
The Ministry of Justice said that it would not investigate for fear of affecting the general election. In fact, some people have set a precedent for this, not others, or the former Federal Investigation Director Comey known as the "dirty cop". One week before the 2016 general election vote, Comey announced to the Clinton email gate that had already closed the case that he had discovered new doubts and started the investigation again. The statement is short but the impact is great. Of course, Comey has now been confirmed as an anti-Trump black force. Why did he do this at the time and made actions that were obviously not conducive to Hillary Clinton? It may be due to his personal selfishness or lack of ability, and poor consideration of things. . But this he created this precedent.
Therefore, the Department of Justice can openly investigate the scandals exposed before this year's election, not to mention, according to the "Wall Street Journal" report, he knew about it more than half a year before the "New York Post" exposed the matter.
Recently, as the FBI began investigating fake ballots, Hunter Biden’s scandal also surfaced, and the Department of Justice publicly launched an investigation. On the surface, it seems that the election is over and there is no need to avoid suspicion, but in fact, it may have something to do with Trump's direct pressure on the Attorney General. But as for whether this investigation is real or just a show, we continue to look at it.
What's interesting is that the leftist media also started to act, starting the Biden scandal. When the scandal was just exposed in October, everyone still remember how the left-wing media and left-wing social media reacted?
Before November, Facebook said that we must suppress the spread of this incident, because after a "third-party fact check", it was found that this was false news; Twitter was more thorough and directly suspended the New York Post account that exposed the Hunter scandal. For more than two weeks, the rumor was considered to be false; the Washington Post said that this was fake news fabricated by Russia; CBS said that the truth of this incident is not known yet, and the notebooks with related scandals cannot be verified; Fox News Adopted a more sleek tactic, saying that some of our hosts reported, they believe, such as Tucker Calson, and some hosts did not report, such as Chris Wallace, they do not believe; the "New York Times" is relatively insidious, only reporting that some people doubt the authenticity of the "New York Post" story, without mentioning the specific content of the "New York Post"; CNN behaved like a hooligan and did not report it at first. It mentioned this incident a few days later, but called on big technology companies to conduct more severe censorship of these scandal reports and wipe out such stories from right-wing media.
As a result, recently, the "New York Times" and CNN and other media, like eating ecstasy, have started to report on Hunter Biden's scandal, which is nothing like before. Who on earth gave them the "hormone" so effective?
It stands to reason that Trump talked to Barr, but there was no report that Trump talked to these media, and there was no public report that Barr was pressing these media. So, now there are other points of view.
For example, the host of Fox News, Tucker Carlson, said that first of all, the general election vote has ended, and this scandal will not affect people’s voting tendency; second, they want to find something to divert people’s attention and not let people pay attention to the controversial issues of the general election itself; third, and more critical, Carlson proposed a possibility that there is a force behind the investigation of the Biden family scandal, and this person is not someone else, but Biden’s party in the office are likely to include Biden’s deputy Kamala Harris. They know that when investigating Hunter Biden, the old Biden must also be involved. If, therefore, there is something wrong with the old Biden, it is likely that Harris would be in charge, and she and her sponsor in Silicon Valley would control the overall situation.
American conservative media person Charlie Kirk also holds a similar view. He believes that the leftist media began to follow up on the Biden scandal because it was the forces behind them and wanted to use this to target Biden.
In addition, if the judiciary finally finds out about foreign hostile forces’ interference in the United States, or issues involving general election disputes, these dirty waters must be carried away with someone. It is not impossible for those evil forces to do it.
News (5)
Di Dongsheng "revealed" Biden. Who is he? Authorities broke the news
Recently, Di Dongsheng, a member of CCP Xi Jinping’s think tank, publicly stated that the CCP has "someone" in the U.S. core circle of power, and mentioned that the CCP has helped the Biden family establish a global fund. The CCP's own words made it difficult for Biden. Rebuttable facts.
Yuan Hongbing, a well-known jurist who left Australia in his early years and was originally in the mainland system, has some details about Di Dongsheng. He said that Dongsheng's revelations were true, but his motives were unbearable. Hongbing said that he learned from friends who are familiar with Dongsheng in his country that Dongsheng was jealous of Jin Canrong who was at Renmin University because of his "mistress" problem. In order to be famous, he overshadows Jin Canrong, and often "speaks endlessly" on different occasions. Of course it was also to please the CCP, but the flattery hit the horse's legs. Yuan Hongbing predicted that Di Dongsheng may face severe punishment within the party.
And I also saw another revelation, saying that Di Dongsheng is a little academic bastard within the system, who is relatively shallow, but likes to show off. He did not predict the successful election of Trump in 2016. Moreover, in an interview later, it was said that the deep state of the United States is the deep government, composed of high- and middle-class affairs officials from key departments such as the U.S. Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, the State Department, and the intelligence community, saying that they are anti-Communist. These people belong to the Washington establishment, and so is Biden. This is a problem. Because in his recent speech, he also mentioned that the CCP wants Biden and those traditional establishments to be in power. This will benefit the CCP. Zhai Dongsheng didn't follow the preface here. Therefore, related analysis does not agree with his statement and definition of deep state.
But Di Dongsheng's exposure of Biden really made him popular. However, it is not only the Biden family who has the problem of "communist treason" in the United States. They are only members of that group.
News (6)
At least thousands of spies in the United States, men and women and gays take all
Fox News reported on December 10 that according to former U.S. defense and intelligence personnel, CCP spies in the U.S. are at least a few hundred or a few thousand in size. Most of them come from prestigious schools and speak fluent English. There is extensive communication on social platforms like LinkedIn or Facebook. Among them, most of the pornographic spies are women, but there are also male pornographic spies, and even the CCP has pornographic spies targeting homosexuals. They will threaten the "prey" after the lure is successful, because these CCP spies will secretly take pictures or video when committing crimes, and become the handle of threats.
Sometimes, CCP spies are rampant. Take a well-known case, Chen Wenying, the double agent of the Chinese Communist Party. On the surface, she was working for the FBI. In fact, she was a running dog of the Ministry of National Security of the Communist Party of China. During the crime, she lured at least two FBI officials into bed and became their lovers. In fact, anyone who has seen the photo thinks that she is not a beauty. But she was able to send intelligence documents directly to the desks of the US president and the Chinese Communist Party leader, respectively, and was quite active. In the end, this Chen Wenying was charged on April 9, 2003.
The recently exposed female Communist spy Fang Fang had an ambiguous relationship with at least two U.S. Mayors including members of the Intelligence Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, threatening U.S. security. What about more people? Therefore, how many people in the United States have been infiltrated and how many people are acting as Chinese spies, the actual situation may be quite astonishing.
News (7)
U.S. Intelligence Director calls for war against the CCP, the Pentagon takes action
At night of December 7, John Ratcliffe, the U.S. intelligence director responsible for overseeing U.S. intelligence agencies, told Fox News: The United States should go to war with the CCP, and don't wait until it is too late. Ratcliffe pointed out that his intelligence will not lie. The CCP is the greatest threat to the United States, and no regime has planned a thorough plan like the CCP to replace the United States. The CCP wants to replace the United States and hopes to dominate the world's economy, technology, and military. At present, the CCP has built the world's largest navy. He also accused the CCP's army of developing gene editing technology and wanted to change the DNA of at least 2 million soldiers to make their bodies stronger. Everyone knows that this is anti-human.
Under the warning of the U.S. Director of Intelligence, the Pentagon in the U.S. have taken corresponding actions.
Based on media reports from the United States and the United Kingdom, Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller sent a letter to the CIA, deciding to significantly reduce military support for the CIA’s operations in the Middle East on counter-terrorism, and reorganize a large amount of manpower and material resources to focus on fighting the CCP and Russia.
Do not be discouraged. The drama is staged. The difficulties and obstacles encountered by the Trump administration are temporary. The matter is not over and the process of attacking the CCP is still going on. Be positive and confident. Come on!
_________
News (1) Updated 13/12/20
The Texas lawsuit was dismissed, the Republicans responded hard
Writer : Liang Dong / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/12/12/a103008527.html / Direct translation
In response to fraud in the US general election, Texas sued the four swing states for violating the constitution. Those who expressed support for Texas were all Republican states, while those who supported the four swing states were mostly Democratic states. Some commentators believe that the essence of this lawsuit is a battle against the U.S. Constitution.
December 8 is the deadline for each state in the United States to certify election results, the so-called "safe harbor period." Left-wing media and social platforms desperately suppressed various opposition voices in an attempt to end the debate about this election.
A lawsuit that day also attracted great attention from the outside world.
The U.S. Constitution stipulates that disputes between two states can be brought directly to the Supreme Court.
In response, Texas Attorney General Paxton filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court, accusing the electoral process of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in violation of the U.S. Constitution. It also requires electors to be appointed by the state legislature.
Texas alleges that the defendant states used courts or administrative means, rather than legislatures, to change voting rules and procedures, violating the "elector clause" stipulated in the Constitution. In addition, within the same state, the voting rules and procedures of different counties are also different, which violates the "equal protection clause" in the constitution.
Attorney General Paxton believes that the illegal actions of the defendants in the states not only harmed the voting rights of their citizens, but also undermined the voting rights of citizens in Texas and other states loyal to the Constitution.
On the same day, U.S. President Trump and Vice President Pence, also acting as plaintiffs in their personal capacity, sued the Democratic presidential candidates Biden and Harris in the circuit court in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. The two counties are accused of a large number of illegal votes and unfair elections. They are asking the judge to overturn the election results in the two counties.
The Texas lawsuit is supported by more than one hundred congressmen from about 20 states across the United States.
The attorney generals of the 22 states controlled by the Democratic Party also sent a letter to the U.S. Supreme Court requesting that they refuse to accept the Texas lawsuit.
Let this lawsuit be the dividing line between parties.
Tang Jingyuan, a current affairs commentator in the United States, said, "On the surface, it is a confrontation between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. I think this is a superficial phenomenon. In fact, the essence of this lawsuit is aimed at protecting the U.S. Constitution. War. This is why we see President Trump saying that if the fraud cannot be eradicated this time, then the United States will no longer have a country."
President Trump sent a number of tweets to the Supreme Court, hoping that the justices, in the face of strong public opinion pressure and threats from the left, would show courage to protect the Constitution, defend democracy, and save the country.
Trump said in a tweet, "If the Supreme Court shows wisdom and courage, the American people will win what is probably the most important case in history, and our election process will be respected again."
Regrettably, on the 11th, the Supreme Court of the Federal Supreme Court rejected Texas's prosecution by a 7-2 vote.
The Supreme Court's order read: "Texas has not proven its judicially recognized interest in the election of other states. All other pending motions are deemed meaningless and will not be considered."
The two justices, Alito and Thomas, who agreed to accept the case, issued a statement saying that they reserved the right of the plaintiff to lodge a complaint, but did not express opinions on other issues in the case.
Texas Attorney General Paxton then issued a statement saying, "I will continue to unremittingly defend the integrity and security of the election and hold those who overthrow the established election law for their own benefit to accountability."
The Texas Republican Party also issued an emergency statement condemning the High Court's connivance of the swing state's ignorance of the constitution, and at the same time calling on all states that abide by the constitution to unite and form a constitution-abiding consortium.
Republican Senator Johnson, chairman of the US Senate "Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee", previously issued a statement saying that the committee will hold its first congressional hearing on December 16 to review "violations" in the 2020 presidential election.
Johnson said that although the court has accepted some related cases, it has not fully reviewed the irregularities in the general election and cannot allow this situation to continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment