Direct translation
Li Keqiang's strongest protest against Xi Jinping! Shocking leaks of secret conversations and transcripts
— Hu Liren reveals another handwritten document from Li Keqiang, revealing the reasons behind his death
Editor: Fang Xun / Source: People's Daily / https://www.aboluowang.com/2025/1006/2287037.html
Shanghai entrepreneur and social media personality Hu Liren, in addition to dedicating himself to uncovering the truth behind former Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's death, has previously stated that he will release each of Li Keqiang's important documents during his lifetime.
Recently, he released a handwritten document on his show, written by Li Keqiang after Xi Jinping's 2018 constitutional amendment.
In the document, Li Keqiang revealed that he voted against the amendment, a powerful protest against Xi Jinping's perverse and tampering with the constitution, thus sowing the seeds of his own demise.
On October 4th, Hu Liren stated on his social media program "Real China" that the document he was releasing today was particularly weighty, as it was written by Li Keqiang in March 2018, the year of the constitutional amendment.
In the document, Li Keqiang wrote: "If any country arbitrarily amends its constitution, it is tantamount to shaking the very foundation of the nation.
Once power is unchecked, social trust will inevitably collapse, and the system will inevitably become meaningless."
The document also stated that China has experienced such pain before.
During the Cultural Revolution initiated by Mao Zedong, his personal will trumped the system, inflicting a heavy price on the entire nation. Countless families were torn apart, the economy was on the verge of collapse, and ideology spiraled into extremism.
But Xi Jinping has continued to reverse course, concentrating power once again, tampering with the constitution, destabilizing society, and eroding economic trust.
A society without rules can only descend into chaos and fear.
In this document, Li Keqiang stated that this was precisely why he insisted on voting against Xi Jinping's constitutional amendment.
He knew the outcome of the vote might be certain, but the people still had the right to reject dictatorship.
Li Keqiang was also fully aware of the consequences of this vote and fully prepared to bear a heavy personal price.
But even so, he remained willing to bear it.
The document pointed out that if the constitution is trampled upon, so-called prosperity will become a castle in the air.
Dictatorship is not strength, but fragility.
Family-based systems are not stability, but decay.
True strength comes from institutions and stability, from the trust of the people, and from cooperation with the civilized world.
Li Keqiang concluded by expressing his hope that future generations will remember that the foundation of the nation lies in the Constitution, and that the hope of democracy lies in the rule of law.
Repeating the same mistakes would be a betrayal of the efforts of generations and a betrayal of the future.
History cannot go back, and China cannot lose its way again.
On March 11, 2018, the Third Plenary Session of the First Session of the 13th National People's Congress of the Communist Party of China was held in the Great Hall of the People. Of the 2,980 delegates who were supposed to attend, 2,964 attended, and 16 were absent.
The meeting voted to adopt the "Amendment to the Constitution of the People's Republic of China," with 2,958 votes in favor, 2 against, 3 abstentions, and 1 invalid vote.
The approval rate exceeded 99.7%.
The Chinese Communist Party's legislature abolished presidential term limits, providing constitutional support for Xi Jinping to remain in office indefinitely and perpetuate his hard-line rule.
Who cast these two dissenting votes? If one was cast by Li Keqiang, who was the other? It's said that when Mao Zedong was elected Chairman of the Central People's Government in 1949, there was also one dissenting vote.
Delegates viewed this lone dissenting vote as a manifestation of Mao's "great humility." However, another widely circulated theory suggests that Mao wasn't as humble as the delegates imagined, and that the dissenting vote came from someone else—Yenching University professor Zhang Dongsun.
Mao Zedong reportedly conducted a thorough investigation into the matter.
As is well known, given Xi Jinping's character, he would undoubtedly investigate the identity of the dissenting vote.
If it were confirmed that Li Keqiang cast that vote, it would be a thorn in Xi Jinping's heart, and he would remove it at the first opportunity.
In August of this year, Hu Liren released another manuscript written by Li Keqiang.
This manuscript records Li Keqiang's concerns and personal resistance before and after the constitutional amendment.
The letter also records a confidential conversation between him and Xi Jinping regarding the constitutional amendment.
In his letter, Li Keqiang recalled that at the end of 2017, Xi Jinping summoned him for a private conversation in the West Building of Zhongnanhai.
Xi Jinping stated bluntly, "We are preparing to push for constitutional amendments to remove presidential term limits. For a stable and strong country, we must rely on centralized leadership."
Li Keqiang responded, "General Secretary, reform is not yet complete.
Amending the constitution now would not only cause unrest within and outside the system, but would also seriously damage our image and trust in the international community."
Xi Jinping replied, "This is not a matter for you to influence personally. This is a decision made after unified consideration by the Party Central Committee.
The overall situation is set and cannot be opposed."
Li Keqiang again insisted, "General Secretary, we cannot replace institutional constraints with personal will.
Power must be regulated. This is the direction of reform we have always pursued."
In the handwritten letter, Li Keqiang wrote, "The atmosphere of the conversation was tense and there was no common ground.
He spoke of centralized leadership, I of the system.
He spoke of the historical mission, I of the national trust."
Li Keqiang said he sensed a warning from Xi Jinping.
His opposition to the constitutional amendment was bound to have disastrous consequences. Hu Liren stated that since forcibly amending the Constitution, Xi Jinping has pushed power to extremes, prioritizing personality cult over the system.
Currently, China's economy is in full recession, and people's livelihoods are suffering. Xi Jinping is using so-called "strengthening the military" and "grand military parades" to intimidate the people and the world.
Xi Jinping is gradually pushing China to the brink of war.
At the same time, Xi Jinping is actively colluding with the global authoritarian camp, echoing regimes such as Russia, North Korea, and Iran, in an attempt to forge a dark alliance that opposes world civilization.
China has been pushed into isolation, losing opportunities for development and the trust of the international community.
Hu Liren also reiterated that Li Keqiang's sudden death, on the surface, was an accident and a mystery.
But everyone understands that in the CCP's ruthless power struggle, so-called accidents are often cold cover-ups.
Under the CCP's centralized system, those who uphold justice and conscience have never had room to survive.
Li Keqiang is not the first victim to be devoured, and he is destined not to be the last.
In June of this year, details of Li Keqiang's murder were widely circulated.
In July, Hu Liren suggested that Li Keqiang may have died from "underwater electrocution."
Hu Liren also stated that Li Keqiang left behind a large number of personal notes, speech transcripts, and handwritten letters.
These materials, totaling over 500, cover major policy considerations, inner reflections, and concerns and hopes for China's future.
The most valuable of these documents were secretly preserved by a close friend.
In the future, he will gradually release these important documents in "Real China."
Aboluowang.com commentator Wang Duran analyzed that Mr. Hu Liren's disclosures reflect his familiarity with the CCP system and its internal dynamics as an entrepreneur who has lived in Shanghai for a long time. He may indeed have access to some information channels or understand some details of the system's operations. However, in terms of journalistic rigor, the information he has released currently lacks independent third-party verification. To date, no physical evidence, such as photos, handwriting comparisons, or paper examinations, has been released, and no other sources or media outlets have cross-verified its authenticity.
No comments:
Post a Comment