Saturday, November 28, 2020

Pennsylvania House of Representatives submitted a resolution objecting to the statewide 2020 election results

News (1)

Pennsylvania House of Representatives submitted a resolution objecting to the statewide 2020 election results

Reporter : Li Yi / https://www.aboluowang.com/2020/1128/1528277.html / Direct translation



The statewide election results that announced the 2020 general election are controversial.

Whereas, Article 1, Section 4, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution authorizes state legislatures, including the Pennsylvania State Assembly, to stipulate the "time, place and manner" of elections; and

Whereas, Article 2, Section 1, Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution authorizes state legislatures, including the Pennsylvania Legislature, to direct the manner in which electors for the President and Vice President of the United States are appointed; and

Whereas the Pennsylvania State Legislature has exercised its power to establish an election management procedure for the Union, namely the Pennsylvania Electoral Act; and

Whereas the Pennsylvania State Electoral Act stipulates that all mailed ballots must be received by 8 pm on the day of the election; and

Whereas the Pennsylvania Electoral Act stipulates that election officials at polling stations must certify the signatures of voters who are present in person; and

In view of the Pennsylvania Election Law, the county election committee shall not meet before 7 a.m. on election day to pre-check all absentee ballots and mailed ballots, and find defects in mailed ballots in advance; and

Whereas the Pennsylvania Electoral Law prohibits the counting of defective absentee ballots or mailed ballots; and

Whereas the Pennsylvania Electoral Law authorizes "observers" elected by candidates and political parties to observe the process of checking absentee ballots and mailed ballots; and

Whereas the Confederation held federal elections on November 3, 2020, including electors who elected the President and Vice President of the United States; and

Whereas officials of the federal executive and judicial departments illegally changed the rules of the federal election on November 3, 2020, which violated the powers of the Congress under the U.S. Constitution; and

In view of the fact that on September 17, 2020, less than 7 weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the party majority of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court illegally unilaterally extended the deadline for mailing ballots, stipulating that ballots without a postmark will be It is presumed to be received in time and can be accepted without the signature of a verified voter; and

In view of October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the election on November 3, 2020, at the request of the Federal Secretary, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the signature of the postal ballot does not need to be authenticated. Distinguish between voters who vote in person and those who send ballots by post, removing important safeguards to prevent potential election crimes; and

Whereas on November 2, 2020, the eve of the election on November 3, 2020, before the prescribed pre-check time, the Office of the Federal Secretary encourages certain counties to notify the party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters who have defective ballots; and

Whereas counties with more Democrats allow voters to be mailed to correct ballot deficiencies, while counties with more Republicans abide by the law and invalidate defective ballots; and

Whereas in certain counties in the Federation, observers are not allowed to meaningfully observe pre-voting and voting activities related to absent and mailed ballots; and

Whereas in other parts of the Federation, observers have observed abnormalities in the absentee ballot and pre-voting and voting process of mailed ballots; and

Whereas, Pennsylvania postal personnel have reported unusual circumstances related to mailing ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to an unfamiliar address, and mailing ballots to vacant houses, open spaces, and non-existent addresses; and

Whereas witnesses who testified before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 provided more convincing information on the management of the 2020 election; and

Whereas the federal election administration litigation on November 3, 2020 is still ongoing; and

In view of the 2016, Pennsylvania election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Federal Secretary, regardless of ongoing litigation, unilaterally prematurely certified the results of the presidential election on November 3, 2020 ;as well as

In view of the responsibility of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives to ensure that no citizen of this Union will be deprived of the right to vote, it insists that all elections are conducted in accordance with the law, and that the public is assured that every legitimate vote will be counted accurately.

Therefore, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives resolved:

1. Recognize that in the election on November 3, 2020, major violations and misconducts related to postal voting, pre-inspection and vote-inspection; and

2. Disapprove of infringement of the power of parliament to manage elections under the U.S. Constitution; and

3. Disagree and disagree with the Federal Secretary's premature verification of the results of the presidential election on November 3, 2020; and

4. Declare that there is a dispute between the election of the elector for this federal president and other statewide elections;

5. Urge the Federal Secretary and Governor to withdraw or revoke the certification of presidential electors, and postpone the certification of other statewide election results voted in the 2020 general election; and

6. Urge the U.S. Congress to declare that the selection of the president of the state is controversial.


___________

News (2) UPDATES 29/11/20

There are many fraud proofs, and the Pennsylvania State Assembly will withdraw the right to appoint electors

Reporter : Yan Xi / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/28/a102997810.html / Direct translation

 The US general election is pending. In Pennsylvania, one of the key states for election fraud lawsuits, the state legislature Republicans plan to regain the right to appoint electors. President Trump expressed his gratitude to those who bravely defended the Constitution.

Senator Doug Mastroiano of Pennsylvania said in a tweet on Saturday (November 28): "There is growing evidence that the Pennsylvania presidential election has been compromised. In this case, According to Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution (Method of Election of Electors), the state legislature has the power to decide how to appoint Electoral College representatives.

On the 25th, the Senate of Pennsylvania held an election hearing in Gettysburg. A large number of witnesses testified against the election fraud in Pennsylvania in this general election. State Senator Mastroano announced on the 27th that he opposed and rejected the state’s certification of the controversial election results, and plans to propose a resolution on November 30 to withdraw appointments from the governor and secretary of state. The power of the electoral college representative of the state. He said the state legislatures controlled by the Republican Party will act together.

Once the Pennsylvania Legislature withdraws its power to appoint electors in the state, it is likely to overturn the previous election results and the legislature will re-elect candidates. The outside world believes this is a major victory for the Trump team.

On Saturday, President Trump said on Twitter: “1,126,940 votes were generated out of thin air. I am a lot ahead of Pennsylvania, maybe more than any of you know. Pennsylvania votes are manipulated and the world is watching.” "Thank you to all the brave men and women of the state legislature for defending our great constitution. Thank you!"

___________

News (3)

Giuliani: The Pennsylvania lawsuit has achieved its purpose and can be submitted to the Supreme Court

Reporter : Gu Fan / Editor : Yun Tao / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/28/a102997660.html / Direct translation

Although the Pennsylvania lawsuit was rejected by the Court of Appeal, Trump lawyer Giuliani said that the lawsuit has achieved its purpose because it can now be submitted to the Supreme Court.

Giuliani told Newsmax on Friday (November 28) that allegations of election fraud have been subject to "major scrutiny" by the courts and the media. In court, they encountered difficulties because judges were unwilling to listen to the case, and the media were unwilling to report their statements.

"We have a lot of evidence. But we don't have a lot of time (statements). The public only knows a little about what kind of evidence we have."

Due to the suppression of the court, the Trump team turned to present evidence of cheating to state assemblies, including Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan. The Pennsylvania hearing was held in Gettysburg last week. Next Monday, some members of the Arizona State Assembly will hold a hearing. On the same day, officials are expected to certify the state's election results.

The Trump legal team will participate in the meeting via video. Participants also included members of the Arizona House of Representatives and Senate and a group of experts.

On Friday, a federal appeals court in Philadelphia rejected Trump's lawsuit challenging the results of the election. However, Giuliani said, "Basically we achieved the purpose of this case" because they have presented the evidence before Republican congressmen. He said that the Supreme Court "can hear it now."

Also on Friday, the Republican Congressman of Pennsylvania introduced a resolution requiring the Secretary of State to invalidate the premature certification of the Pennsylvania election results, requiring the declaration of disputes over the choice of presidential electors, and requiring the secretary of state and the governor to withdraw the presidential election. People’s certification requires that the US Congress also announce that the 2020 presidential election is controversial.

In addition, this Wednesday, a Pennsylvania judge, Patricia McCullough, issued an injunction prohibiting Pennsylvania from continuing to certify the election results, pending further hearings. The order is a ruling on the lawsuit of Congressman Mike Kelly. Kelly alleged that a Pennsylvania law allows residents to vote by mail without any excuses, which violates the Pennsylvania Constitution.

______

News (4)

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overturns Block on Certification of Election Results

Reporter : Janita Kan / The Epoch Times PREMIUM 

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Saturday overturned a lower court’s order blocking election officials from certifying the results of the 2020 election. The court also dismissed the case with prejudice.

In a Per Curiam opinion, the state’s top court ruled to vacate Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough’s injunctive relief that would have prevented the state from taking further steps to complete the certification of the presidential race.

The court said the petitioners had failed to file their challenge in a “timely manner,” as they had filed their suit more than one year after the enactment of Act 77—the law central to the case.

The case at hand—cited as Kelly v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania—was filed by a group of Republican politicians who argue that Act 77, a law that made voting by mail without an excuse legal in Pennsylvania, violates the state’s constitution.

The lawsuit alleges that the state law is “another illegal attempt to override the limitations on absentee voting prescribed in the Pennsylvania Constitution, without first following the necessary procedure to amend the constitution to allow for the expansion.”

Earlier this week, McCullough granted an emergency request by the plaintiffs to temporarily block the certification after the Keystone state announced it was poised to finalize the process of formal certification for the presidential election results.

The Commonwealth judge explained in her opinion, issued on Friday, that the “petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment.”

She also opined that the “petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene” the plain language of the provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which deals with absentee voting.

The state Supreme Court said on Saturday that the petitioners waited until days before the county of boards of election were required to certify the election results, which could “result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters” who voted by mail.

“It is beyond cavil that Petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim,” the court wrote.

Chief Justice Thomas Saylor issued a separate opinion agreeing to reverse the preliminary injunction. However, Saylor said he believes the Republican petitioners should still be able to argue their case about the constitutional validity of Act 77.

“I find that the relevant substantive challenge raised by Appellees presents troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme,” Saylor wrote.

Justice Sallie Mundy joined in that opinion.

The lawyers of the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.


_________

News (5)

'The President Has Clear Paths to Victory:' Michael Flynn

Reporter : Allen Zhong / Publisher : The Epoch Times

Gen. Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser for President Donald Trump who was pardoned by the president, said that Trump has clear paths to victory.

“The president has clear paths to victory,” he said during an interview with WVW-Tv.

He added that it doesn’t require a lot of courtroom action but will require Americans to come forward to tell their stories.

Hundreds and hundreds of Americans in different states are coming forward, Flynn said, with 10 to 12 new affidavits from one state received just on Saturday.

“We’re not in this to lose these battles, we’re in this to win these battles. I believe we’re going to win. I’m confident because we have the right people and the right plan and strategy,” he stated.

Various posts by Flynn on social media suggest that he works closely with Sidney Powell—his lead attorney since 2019—who is focusing on the alleged fraud related to voting machines and claims that voting software companies have been involved in a transnational conspiracy to overturn the election.

Currently, there are several teams or individuals working on the legal battle for Trump’s re-election in battleground states. Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani is leading the Trump campaign’s legal team. Powell is leading another legal effort and working independently. Some state Republican committees and individual Republicans have also joined these legal fights.

Possible Paths for Trump’s Re-election

In Pennsylvania, a judge ruling may clear a narrow path for a Trump victory in the Keystone state.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough wrote in an opinion (pdf) on Friday that the Republican argument that the mail-in voting conducted in the recent general election was unconstitutional may win the case, according to Act 77. She wrote to explain her rationale for her injunction blocking the certification of Pennsylvania’s election results.

McCullough suggested that because having the legislature to appoint the electors—an “untenable” option “if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method”—was not the only “equitable remedy” for the state to uphold “a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election,” she would grant to injunction.

But her ruling was overturned by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which is the appeal court in the state, on Saturday. The case is now very likely to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Another possible path for Trump’s reelection goes through the state legislature.

The GOP state lawmakers in Pennsylvania announced on the same day that they will introduce a resolution to request the United States Congress to declare that the results of the 2020 election in the Commonwealth are in dispute, The Epoch Times reported.

State senator Doug Mastriano, a Republican, told Steve Bannon’s War Room on Friday that the GOP-controlled state legislature was going to make a bid to reclaim its power to appoint the state’s electors to the Electoral College.

The Pennsylvania Republicans took those actions after a public hearing organized by the Senate Republicans on Nov. 25. Giuliani, several poll watchers, and experts testified during the hearing.

Similar hearings have been scheduled in Arizona for Monday and in Michigan on Dec. 1.

Trump on Saturday praised state lawmakers for defending the U.S. Constitution.

“So much credit to all of the brave men and women in state houses who are defending our great Constitution. Thank you!” the president wrote in a Twitter post.

Ref: https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-president-has-clear-paths-to-victory-michael-flynn_3597034.html

___________

News (6)

Pennsylvania Senator: 'Mounting Evidence' Shows Election Was Compromised

Reporter : Zachiary Stieber  / Publisher : The Epoch Times PREMIUM

A growing body of evidence shows the presidential election in Pennsylvania was compromised, a state senator said Saturday.

“There is mounting evidence that the PA presidential election was compromised. If this is the case, under Article II, Section 1.2 of the U.S. Constitution, the state legislature has the sole authority to direct the manner of selecting delegates to the Electoral College,” state Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, said on Twitter.

“This power was given to the state legislature for the purpose of safeguarding the appointment of our president, specifically contemplating corruption and ensuring that the people are not disenfranchised through a corrupt election process,” he added. “Therefore, we are introducing a resolution to exercise our obligation and authority to appoint delegates to the Electoral College.”

Mastriano and other state lawmakers announced Friday they will soon introduce a resolution to dispute the results of the election, alleging that “documented irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing have undermined our elector process and as a result we cannot accept certification of the results in statewide races.”

The resolution calls on the Pennsylvania House of Representatives to recognize the alleged irregularities and improprieties and disapprove of what lawmakers describe as the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority to regulate elections.

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar extended the mail ballot deadline without permission from the legislature. The U.S. Supreme Court earlier this month ordered Pennsylvania election officials to separate ballots that arrived after the previously-scheduled deadline up to the extended one while justices weigh whether the action was legal.

Pennsylvania lawmakers also said in the resolution they disapprove and disagree with the certification of election results, calling it “premature,” and want Boockvar and Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, to withdraw or vacate the certification. And they called on the U.S. Congress “to declare the selection of presidential electors in this commonwealth to be in dispute.”

Republicans control the House and Senate in Pennsylvania but it’s not clear if they have enough support to pass the resolution. Twenty-six of the House’s 203 members are co-sponsoring the resolution so far.

Mastriano has said the legislature is trying to claim its power to appoint the state’s electors to the Electoral College, an unusual mechanism that’s rarely been triggered in U.S. history. “We have a fight on our hands and we’re gonna fight. We’re gonna take the fight all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to,” he said.

Trump wrote on Twitter early Saturday that he “won Pennsylvania by a lot, perhaps more than anyone will ever know,” calling the election “RIGGED.” The current results show Democratic presidential nominee Biden won. Biden’s campaign has dismissed allegations of election fraud.

In a separate matter, a judge on Friday said Republicans who filed a lawsuit challenging a mail-in voting law passed last year will likely succeed.

“Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment,” Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough, who blocked the certification of Pennsylvania’s election results, wrote in her ruling.

Ivan Pentchoukov and Jack Phillips contributed to this report.

________

News  (7)   UPDATES 30/11/20

Data expert: FBI has launched an investigation into illegal voting

Reporter : Zhu Ying / Editor : Mei Lan / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/29/a102998252.html / Direct translation

Well-known data expert Matt Braynard disclosed on Sunday (29th) that the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has proactively contacted him and asked him to provide information about the general election. Data analysis of illegal voting, he is providing relevant information to the agency. He expressed optimistically that he believes that this law enforcement agency still has many patriots dedicated to upholding the Constitution and laws.

Matt Braynard, the data director of Trump’s 2016 campaign, posted on his Twitter account on Sunday morning: “@FBI has directly asked me to provide VIP (analysis) results indicating the existence of illegal voting. "

He went on to state in a tweet, "As of Tuesday, we will pass all data (including name, address, phone number, etc.) to the organization."

Braynard is still tweeting: "In the past few years, (I) have made legitimate criticisms of the actions of the leaders of this organization, but I can personally prove that there are many ordinary people in this organization. The Patriots are fighting to maintain the Constitution, law and order."

Braynard also disclosed that the data research team he leads has submitted part of the data analysis and related statements about fraud in the election to the hearing or court; there are also some data analysis results that will soon appear in Pennsylvania and Georgia. State, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona court documents.

After the voting day of the US general election, a number of key swing states were accused of large-scale election fraud, and evidence continued to burst. A few days later, Brainard formed a professional team and launched an operation named "Voter Integrity Project", which specifically analyzed the voting statistics of key states in the 2020 general election, and found that There are a lot of voting violations.

In a number of key swing states in recent days, President Trump’s re-election campaign is pushing ahead with a legal battle over election fraud. Following the election hearings held by the Pennsylvania Senate on the 25th of this month, the Arizona State Assembly and the Michigan State Assembly will also hold hearings on election fairness on November 30 and December 1, respectively. It is reported that Matt Braynard will go to Arizona to testify in person, and there will be more witnesses and material evidence including statistical data analysis at the hearing.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Hotel Review : Louis' Runway View Hotel, Phuket

 Review, photo copyright by : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA This hotel has the nearest walking distance to the Domestic Terminal of Phuket A...