News (1)
Chairman of the Election Committee: Trump is submitting legal charges to court
Trainor: Hundreds of sworn testimonies now show that election fraud exists
U.S. Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor stated that the Trump campaign team passed sworn testimonies from credible witnesses and is challenging states. The other evidence used in the election results is being submitted to the court as "legal charges."
According to a report on the "Just the News" website on November 21, Trainor stated that after reviewing the evidence released by the Trump team, including many sworn testimonies declaring voter fraud, as well as Pennsylvania up to 10% issued by a famous mathematician, affidavits with 10,000 votes are in question. He believes that these evidences have met the first level of legal review to avoid motions to withdraw the case, or avoid the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Article 12 (b) ) Subparagraph (6) "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted" (failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted) and the case was dismissed by the court.
Professor Steven Miller, a mathematics expert at Williams College, a world-renowned liberal arts college, said that based on the analysis of Pennsylvania election data and a survey of telephone interviews with voters in the state, the analysis showed that the state has up to 100,000 absentee ballots that are questionable.
Miller said that he analyzed Pennsylvania vote data collected by former Trump campaign data director Matt Braynard (Matt Braynard) and telephone interviews with 2,684 voters and found two worrying signs: 1) It is possible that legitimate votes are not counted; 2) Another is that someone impersonated a registered voter to apply for votes.
News (2)
Chairman of the Election Commission: Witnesses can be booked to be credible
Trainor pointed out that the subsequent legal threshold for crossing the "movement to withdraw" is the "summary judgment stage." He believes that considering the level of testimony he has observed so far, at this stage, the witnesses can be booked to be credible.
The website of the Legal Information Institute of Cornell University School of Law explains, “When considering a motion for summary judgment, the judge will look at all the evidence from the perspective that is most beneficial to the opponent’s opponent.”
On Friday (November 20), Trainor said on the "Just the News AM" program, "If I were the other side of these elections that are going on across the country, what I would worry about is that if you look at these oaths the level of evidence provided in the book—hundreds of affidavits confirming local incidents—in the summary judgment stage of these cases, you must use the plaintiff’s evidence as true evidence.”
“The court must treat the plaintiff’s evidence as true and see if the other party can file a lawsuit.” He added, “Therefore, in these cases, the large number of affidavits we have seen indicate that there is actually fraud. These questions really need to be answered."
On Thursday (November 19), the Trump lawyers team led by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani held a press conference. Trump lawyers team members reiterated that they would seek to protect many sworn witnesses' privacy, waiting to share their identity with the court to protect them from potential harassment.
News (3)
Chairman of the Election Commission: These legal charges will be tried in court
At present, the Trump campaign is launching legal proceedings in multiple swing states. Trainor said:,"In the final analysis, what I want to say is that these legal charges will be tried in court."
He added, "We need to make this legal process work so that we can draw valid conclusions about this election (in order) to make everyone think it is legal (the election)."
Trump team lawyer Sidney Powell said on Friday that in the next two weeks, her team will be able to prove all allegations of election fraud in court because there is currently a lot of evidence that is more than enough.
News (4)
Trump’s road to victory will be an uphill battle
In an interview with John Solomon, the famous Harvard legal scholar Alan Dershowitz said that if the plaintiff proves that a sufficient number of votes are affected, According to the results of elections in specific states, Trump’s legal challenge to the results of the 2020 presidential election may rise to the Supreme Court.
Dershowitz also said that Trump’s road to victory will be an uphill battle. He said that this was due to the lack of certified election results in certain states that caused constitutional issues that had never been raised in American history.
The Thomas More Society's National Conservative Legal Organization Amistad Project announced on Friday that it will provide support to Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia, and Arizona. The results of the presidential election filed federal and state lawsuits to challenge the results of the presidential elections in these states. Giuliani said that the Trump campaign team will work with the Amistad project based on specific circumstances.
_______
News (5)
Law firm withdraws from representing Boockvar in Trump campaign's Pennsylvania lawsuit
Reporters : Tom Ozimek, Jack Phillips / Source : The Epoch Times
Law firm Kirkland & Ellis has requested withdrawal from representing Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar in a lawsuit brought forward by the Trump campaign, with Kramer Levin attorney Barry Berke stepping in as a substitute.
Kirkland & Ellis attorneys made the request in a notice of substitution of counsel filed on Nov. 20 (pdf), noting that Boockvar would be represented by law firm Kramer Levin, Myers Brier & Kelly, and the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, until the end of legal proceedings.
This is not the first time Berke is to confront President Donald Trump’s legal team, with the National Law Journal reporting that Berke served as special counsel to the House Judiciary Committee as it built its impeachment case against Trump.
The move to switch legal representation comes after Linda Kerns, a lawyer leading the Trump campaign’s efforts to dispute the election results in Pennsylvania, complained to a federal court that she received an abusive voicemail from a Kirkland & Ellis attorney, with Kerns saying the message “by any measure falls afoul of standards of professional conduct.”
In a response, Kirkland lawyer Daniel Donovan said he thought the call was “discourteous and not appropriate” but disagreed with how Kerns had described it.
He said the company associate was “acting unilaterally, in his personal capacity, without the knowledge or authorization of undersigned counsel or the firm.”
Kerns has been placed under official protection after allegedly being subjected to various forms of harassment, with a Nov. 18 filing (pdf) saying she was “the subject of threats of harm, to the point at which the involvement of police and U.S. Marshals has been necessary to provide for her safety.”
She wrote on Nov. 16 that she had “been subjected to continuous harassment in the form of abusive emails, phone calls, physical and economic threats, and even accusations of treason—all for representing the President of the United States’ campaign in this litigation.”
Kerns later sought permission to quit working on the case, and Judge Matthew Brann allowed her to be “withdrawn as counsel” for the Trump campaign, according to a court filing.
There have been reports of harassment targeting lawyers representing Trump in election-related legal challenges.
The Trump campaign and Republican allies have filed several lawsuits in Pennsylvania, including challenging a deadline extension that allowed mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day to be counted, another alleging poll observers were kept too far away from vote counters and that Democrat-majority counties received preferential treatment, and another challenging Boockvar’s deadline extension for absentee voters to provide missing proof of identification.
No comments:
Post a Comment