News (1)
Pennsylvania election investigation hearing witnesses reveal a lot of fraud
Reporter : Luo Tingting / Editor: Zhu Xinrui / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/26/a102995599.html / Direct translation
Image : On November 25, the people of Pennsylvania protested in Gettysburg, demanding that the Biden camp stop the election stealing. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Image : On November 25, the people of Pennsylvania protested in Gettysburg, demanding that the Biden camp stop the election stealing. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
On November 25, local time, the Senate of Pennsylvania held a public hearing on election fraud in Gettysburg. Rudy Giuliani, the head of the Trump campaign lawyer team, and several witnesses disclosed a large number of fraudulent inside information at the hearing.
At the hearing, the witness pointed out that according to public data, Pennsylvania had influxed nearly 600,000 votes in one and a half hours during the counting of votes on November 4. Among them, Biden had 570,000 votes, while Trump only 3200 sheets. The testimony caused an uproar at the hearing.
At the hearing, the witness pointed out that according to public data, Pennsylvania had influxed nearly 600,000 votes in one and a half hours during the counting of votes on November 4. Among them, Biden had 570,000 votes, while Trump only 3200 sheets. The testimony caused an uproar at the hearing.
On election day (November 3), Trump once led Biden in Pennsylvania by about 700,000 votes, which is almost a sure chance. However, Pennsylvania suddenly stopped counting votes at night. At the White House press conference, Trump accused the Biden camp of fraud.
On the morning of November 4th, Pennsylvania suddenly flooded with a large number of suspicious Biden mailed votes, causing Biden to overtake Trump.
Trump spoke at the hearing on November 25 over the phone that the Democrats did not expect him to get so many votes. They flooded the votes and showed their feet.
In addition to a large number of suspicious ballots, an elderly female voter testified via remote video that she went to the polling station to vote on November 3. The ballot given to her by the staff did not have the option of Trump and Vice President Pence, but she herself wanted to voted for President Trump.
Polling staff were vague about this, claiming that it was for the privacy of voters and did not indicate it. Just ask them to put the ticket in the scanner as it is. She did so, but felt very disturbed, but after questioning other voters, she learned that this phenomenon did not happen.
Another Democratic scrutineer witness said that she chose to be a witness because "I don't care who won the election, I only care that the election is fair."
She said that she saw at the scene that the election director guided a non-compliant person into the voting point to vote. She tried to stop, but was abused by the supervisor and tried to threaten her to leave the scene. In addition, she also found a potential duplicate voting phenomenon at the polling station, which was completely out of compliance.
Trump's lawyer Giuliani alleged at the hearing that during the Pennsylvania election, several Republican supervisors were barred from conducting meaningful supervision of the election process.
Giuliani quoted the testimony of witnesses who will be present at the hearing, saying, "In the cases in Philadelphia, Allegheny County, and one or two other counties, the mailed votes they received were not monitored by any Republicans. These votes are hidden from Republicans."
Giuliani said that there is only one chance to monitor a ballot. Once you separate the envelope with verification information from the ballot, you can no longer verify it.
During the hearing, several Republicans in Pennsylvania testified to the committee that they were obstructed in the voting in Philadelphia and confirmed other violations in Philadelphia.
The election monitor, Justin Qweder, confirmed that he was unable to conduct proper supervision while supervising the counting of votes at the Philadelphia Convention Center. "The Election Commission erected a fence of about 50 feet throughout the length of the (counting) room. All inspectors were enclosed behind the fence. More than one hundred employees of the Philadelphia Election Commission handled and opened the fence on the other side of the fence. Mail the ballot."
Qweder said the workers were placed "about 10 feet to 200 feet above us." “Because the workers are far from the erected fence, neither I nor any of the inspectors can see what the workers are doing. The inspectors cannot challenge any decisions regarding the handling of these mailed ballots."
He said, "The Philadelphia Election Commission processed hundreds of thousands of mailed ballots without public supervision or observation."
Another monitor, Kim Peterson, also stated that she was unable to conduct normal supervision and was about 20 feet away from her nearest election employee.
She said that the monitors were originally used to show the counting of votes, but they were vague and could not be read at all. "You can't even see (the vote count)...very frustrating."
Qweder testified that the second problem he found in irregular elections was the committee’s repeated procedures.
The Election Committee will copy the damaged mailed ballots that cannot be read by the scanner. He was told that there were more than 5,000 damaged ballots. The actual number is unknown and may be even higher.
The Election Committee will copy the damaged mailed ballots that cannot be read by the scanner. He was told that there were more than 5,000 damaged ballots. The actual number is unknown and may be even higher.
During the copying process, there were only two employees. One person read the check mark on the damaged ballot aloud, and the other used a pink highlighter to mark a blank ballot. The committee's plan is to scan these duplicated ballots through a scanner.
But on November 12, the inspectors were told that the pink highlighter could not be read by the scanner and the committee had to reproduce all ballots.
"The Election Committee's solution is to give the workers stacks of hundreds of blank mail ballots," Qweder said. The workers filled in with dark pens, and the process was not monitored. The inspector was not informed in advance.
Qweder said the workers had been working for hours before the inspectors realized what had happened. When the inspector questioned the relevant officials about this violation, the workers were only 6 to 20 feet away and waved to the observers every "twice re-engineered" mailed ballot... In the end there were thousands of ballots in this way Be counted.
Qweder said this process is illegal.
Trump also mentioned at the hearing that the Republican vote scrutineers in Pennsylvania were made things difficult by local election officials. "If you are a scrutineer for the Republican Party, you will be treated like a dog, while the Democrats have no such problem... This is a crude tactic."
Trump said, "This is what happened in Pennsylvania. This is not what should happen in the United States of America. I think everyone understands why you are here and why you are doing so hard on this matter."
At present, the Trump team's lawsuit in Pennsylvania has entered the appeal stage. On November 25, a Pennsylvania judge ordered that state officials shall not continue to authenticate the results of the 2020 election until the court holds a hearing on Friday (November 27).
Reporter : Luo Tingting / Editor: Zhu Xinrui / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/26/a102995599.html / Direct translation
News (2)
U.S. election fraud reveals stuff, Trump taunts: they stepped on the wrong accelerator
Reporter : Luo Tingting / Chief Editor: Zhu Xinrui / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/26/a102995570.html / Translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA
Image : The Senate of Pennsylvania held a public hearing on election fraud in Gettysburg on November 25. Several witnesses revealed the facts of election fraud in Pennsylvania. President Trump participated in the meeting by telephone. Schematic.
The Pennsylvania Senate held a public hearing on election fraud in Gettysburg on November 25. Several witnesses revealed the facts of election fraud in Pennsylvania. President Trump also participated in the meeting by telephone. He pointed out that there was election fraud in key states such as Pennsylvania, and mocked that Democrats did not expect him to get such a high number of votes. They stepped on the wrong accelerator to show his feet.
The Pennsylvania senator who presided over the hearing said that this will be the most important hearing in Pennsylvania in 100 years. President Trump also made an "unexpected" speech at the hearing. The people responded enthusiastically, stood up and applauded Trump and shouted the rally slogan "Trump, Trump" in unison.
Trump spoke on the phone for nearly 10 minutes. He first thanked all the affidavits signed and all the speakers at the scene. He said, "It's a very sad thing that people have been tampered with in this election, and we can't let this happen."
Trump said that a program he listened to in the morning said that it is impossible for Trump to lose the election. Look at Trump's rally in Pennsylvania before the vote. So many people attended.
Trump mentioned that the Republican scrutineers in Pennsylvania were made difficult by local election officials and were not allowed to enter the ballots; even if they were allowed to enter the counting room, they had to supervise the counting of votes from a distance like a baseball game.
At the hearing, election monitors Justin Qweder and Kim Peterson stated that they were placed "10 feet to 200 feet or more" from the scene, but they still found many violations of local regulations.
Trump also said, "We won the election with 74 million votes. If you were talking about 74 million votes before the election, every professional in this industry would say impossible."
"We now have 11 million more votes than four years ago in 2016. We have more votes than President Ronald Reagan when he won 49 states. No one thought we would lose."
He suggested that the public look at the numbers after 10 pm of election night (November 3). When everyone thought the election was actually over, something very strange suddenly happened—Trump’s votes were constantly being taken by Biden to catch up and even be surpassed in some key states.
For example, Trump said that in Wayne County, Michigan, where Detroit is located, two Republican Election Committee members refused to certify the election because 70% of the county's electoral districts received far more votes than they were sent out. This is an obvious sign of fraud. As a result, they were harassed by the left of the Democratic Party.
"This is really terrible. They (Wayne County) gave more votes than voters." Trump said, "This election is manipulated, and we cannot let this happen. The results of the election must be reversed."
"The Democrats lost this election and they cheated. This is a fraudulent election. They flooded the vote." Trump said, "They are crazy because the votes we got far exceeded their imagination. They stepped on the wrong accelerator and got caught, just like I caught them monitoring my campaign team (referring to 2016)."
At the hearing, the issue of a large number of Biden votes in Pennsylvania was publicly questioned. Witnesses pointed out that according to public data, Pennsylvania poured in nearly 600,000 votes in one and a half hours during the counting of votes on November 4. Among them, Biden had 570,000 votes, while Trump had only 3,200. The testimony caused an uproar in the hearing.
Trump said that he now has all kinds of evidence and testimony from all parties, and called on the judicial system to hear cases impartially.
Trump finally thanked former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani for his courage,. "This is much more important than you become a great mayor of New York City and a big man in New York City. This will be your highest achievement because you are saving our country."
_______
News (3)
At Pennsylvania hearing, Giuliani and witnesses reveal insider election fraud
Reporter : Zhang Ting / https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/20/11/25/n12575647.htm / Direct translation / Image : The public hearing in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (Samuel Corum / Getty Images)
On Wednesday (November 25), the Pennsylvania State Senate held an election hearing in Gettysburg. Rudy Giuliani, head of Trump's campaign lawyer team, and several witnesses accused the state of major voting violations, saying that Republican scrutineers were deprived of the process of scrutinizing votes s right.
The Senate of Pennsylvania issued a notice on Tuesday that at the request of Senator Doug Mastriano, Republican of Pennsylvania, the Senate Majority Policy Committee will hold a hearing on Wednesday to discuss issues related to the 2020 Pennsylvania election.
Giuliani: Handling of mailed votes is not monitored by Republican scrutineers
Giuliani alleged at a hearing on Wednesday that during the Pennsylvania election earlier this month, several Republican supervisors were barred from conducting meaningful oversight of the election process.
Giuliani quoted the testimony of witnesses who will be present at the hearing, saying, "In the cases in Philadelphia, Allegheny County, and one or two other counties, the mailed votes they received were not monitored by any Republicans. , These votes are hidden from Republicans."
Giuliani said that there is only one chance to monitor a ballot. Once you separate the envelope with verification information from the ballot, you can no longer verify it.
Witness exposes inside story of fraud in Philadelphia
Several Republicans in Pennsylvania also testified to the committee, claiming to have witnessed similar violations during the state's election.
A number of witnesses testified that they were obstructed while scrutinizing votes in Philadelphia, and they also confirmed other violations in Philadelphia.
Election monitors Justin Qweder and Kim Peterson were the first two witnesses at the hearing. They confirmed that they were unable to conduct proper supervision while supervising the counting of votes at the Philadelphia Convention Center.
Qweder said he was an accredited inspector on election day and returned as a volunteer inspector for the next 10 days. He estimated that he spent a total of about 85 hours in the center. He said the scenes he saw were "problematic to say the least."
Qweder said: "The Philadelphia Electoral Commission processed hundreds of thousands of mailed ballots without public supervision or observation."
"The Election Commission erected a fence of about 50 feet throughout the length of the (counting) room. All inspectors were enclosed behind the fence. More than one hundred employees of the Philadelphia Election Commission handled and opened the fence on the other side of the fence. Mail the ballot," Qweder said.
He also said that these workers were placed "about 10 feet to 200 feet above us."
He said: “Because the workers are far away from the erected fence, neither I nor any of the inspectors can see what the workers are doing. The inspectors cannot challenge any decisions about handling these mailed ballots."
Qweder said the second problem he found irregularities was the committee's repeated procedures. The inspector was told that the Election Committee would copy damaged mailed ballots that could not be read by the scanner. He was told that there were more than 5,000 damaged ballots, the actual number is unknown and may be even higher.
The copying process only involved 2 employees. One person read aloud the check mark on the damaged ballot, and the other used a pink highlighter to mark a blank ballot. The committee's plan is to scan these duplicated ballots through a scanner.
On November 12, the inspectors were told that the pink highlighter could not be read by the scanner and the committee had to reproduce all ballots.
"The Election Committee's solution is to give the workers stacks of hundreds of blank mail ballots," Qweder said. The workers filled in with dark pens, and the process was not monitored.
He said they were marking thousands of blank mailed ballots, and the workers had been doing it for hours before the inspector realized what had happened because the inspector had not been told what had happened.
He also said that only when the inspectors questioned the relevant officials about such violations did they establish a system where the workers would shake each "twice re-engineered" post to the observer from 6 to 20 feet away. Votes... Thousands of votes were eventually counted in this way.
Qweder said that he found this to be a problem, which is illegal.
Pennsylvania Democratic Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar (Kathy Boockvar) said she has not seen any evidence of election fraud or large-scale violations. State data show that Biden leads Trump with approximately 80,000 votes.
Another inspector, Peterson, also said that she could not conduct normal supervision. She said it was about 20 feet away from her nearest election employee.
She said that the monitors were originally used to show the counting of votes, but they were vague and could not be read at all.
She said: "You can't even see (the count)... It's very frustrating."
________________
News (4)
Pennsylvania voter's witness: 47 USB cards were missing on polling day
Reporter : Luo Tingting / Editor : Deming / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/27/a102996400.html / Direct translation
At an election fraud hearing in Pennsylvania, a Republican scrutineer in Delaware County testified that he saw with his own eyes many violations on polling day. Including 47 USB flash memory cards missing. He also said that recently almost all of Delaware County's regulatory records, audio and video recordings and other things have been lost.
On November 25, the Republican Policy Committee of the Pennsylvania Senate held a public hearing on election fraud. Security fraud expert and polling station observer Greg. Greg Stenstrom testified at the hearing.
Stansstrom said that he has seen many chain-of-custody violations with his own eyes, including the issue of mailing ballots, the balance of ballots in the drop box, and the handling of USB flash memory cards.
Stansstrom said that all of this violated both the Delaware County Election Commission's regulations and the election process review regulations. "They didn't abide by any rules. I was surprised that this happened."
He also recounted that on election day, he witnessed a supervisor uploading USB card data to the voting machine without the supervision of voting observers.
Stansstrom said that he had seen such a situation at least 24 times. "He (the supervisor) was wearing wide clothes when he came in. We took the picture and put it in the testimony. The Democratic Party's voting observers also saw it at the time."
A lawyer told Stansstrom that it is normal for the manager to take several USB cards left on the machine and input them into the counting system. But Stansstrom asked the federal prosecutor William. William McSwain and some law enforcement officials said it is abnormal for more than two USB cards to stay in the voting machine.
Stansstrom said that he later learned that "the destination of these 24 to 30 USB cards with data uploaded" is unknown, and "as of today, 47 USB cards are missing."
He also emphasized that nearly all of Delaware County's regulatory records, audio and video recordings, and yellow pages have been lost recently. He believes that there are now approximately 120,000 votes in Delaware County being questioned.
Another witness, Internet security expert Phil Waldron, who has studied intelligence and information warfare for about 30 years, said at the hearing: "The voting machine system in the United States and Pennsylvania (Dominion) is R&D to manipulate elections."
He said, “Our experts and other scholars believe that as many as 1.2 million votes in Pennsylvania may have been tampered with or fraudulently conducted. This is what we have discovered in the past 22 days.” Identification and analysis are required to determine the specifics. Number.
Rudy, the chief lawyer of the Trump team. Rudy Giuliani said at the hearing that the Pennsylvania election process was a "scam." He also said that Penn State's violations also occurred in other swing states.
Although there have been a large number of election fraud incidents in Pennsylvania, the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania confirmed that Biden won on the 24th. On the 25th, Pennsylvania Federal Judge McCullough ordered that before the hearing on the 27th, Pennsylvania should stop certifying the results of the presidential election and stop certifying all election results.
Giuliani told the Pennsylvania Republicans at the hearing that according to the Constitution, the state assembly can ignore the popular vote and decide on its own to assign 20 Pennsylvania electoral votes to Trump. He suggested that Republican Senators of Pennsylvania vote for their own electoral college.
Trump’s personal lawyer Ellis (Jenna Ellis) also told the hearing attendees that because the election was rife with corruption and fraud, Pennsylvania’s established procedures for selecting voters no longer apply. According to the Constitution, the state legislature has the power to disqualify the state electoral college and re-elect the electoral college.
U.S. President Trump also delivered a speech at the hearing over the phone, "We must come back, there is no doubt."
Trump said, "We have all the evidence and all the testimony. All we need to do is to get some judges to listen to the opinions correctly, without political opinions or other issues."
_____________
News (5)
Significance of the Tri-state Hearing Trump Pennsylvania Connection
Host : Yokogawa / Editor : Li Hao / https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/20/11/26/n12576370.htm / Direct translation
There are currently three state legislatures in the United States calling for hearings on allegations of election fraud. Today, Pennsylvania first held a testimony with dozens of witnesses. Before the end, President Trump called to thank the participants. What is the significance of this type of hearing, and what does the witness testimony indicate? How does it affect the current legal proceedings?
There are three major developments in the US election: hearings, courts, and litigation.
What is the significance of the hearings in Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Michigan?
The constitution stipulates that elections are not presided over by the governor's secretary of state. Only state legislators have the power, including the election of electoral college members/public hearings, national broadcasts, and the process of electoral fraud through eyewitnesses.
Today’s hearing was held in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and many speakers mentioned its historical significance. A congressman said that 100 years from now, people will think this is the greatest hearing of the state assembly. In the history of the three major crises in the United States, the public hearing of the State Senate Majority Policy Committee proposed by the state senator, and the YouTube live broadcast by NTDTV, were watched online by up to 80,000 people at the same time.
Witnesses include scrutineers (at most), chairman of Republican local committees, ordinary voters, data experts, and occupations include lawyers, former prosecutors, company owners, and information warfare and electronic warfare experts. Many people have been scrutinizing votes for many years, are very experienced, are the backbone of society, and are typical voters with very high credibility.
The strange thing is that those who come out to tell the truth need to swear to testify and bear the legal responsibility for perjury, while those who cheat arbitrarily do not seem to be liable.
In terms of testimony, many scrutineers talked about repeated counting, inexplicable increase or disappearance of votes, and the unusual operation of the counting machine, such as witnessing someone inserting a USB flash drive into the machine more than 20 times. Illegal operation. The scrutineers are not allowed to enter and can only enter in an invisible place. The on-site monitor is blurred and the on-site vote counting is not updated immediately.
We have all heard of these before, but they are all summed up by the legal team, and seeing real people speak directly, it feels completely different. Americans pay most attention to personal experiences and feelings. The court values these sworn personal testimonies.
Speaking of individuals, I would like to mention the remote video testimony of a family of three. The main witness is an 80-year-old mother. After printing out the voting results, I found that Trump and Pence did not have the election, but everyone else did. The daughter was in another county. On this question, the son-in-law’s testimony is particularly interesting. Printing the ballots on the spot and sending them to the machine for scanning is very complicated and inconvenient for the elderly.
Giuliani asked a very good question. Why did the same situation occur at the same time everywhere, driving away or banning Republican scrutineers, and suddenly there was a sudden increase in Biden votes in the second half of the night, but Trump’s votes stagnated? This time there is a data. It was the information warfare team that said that the 600,000 votes that were suddenly added that night were almost all Biden's, and Trump had only 3,000, which is statistically impossible. He also talked about sending more than 1 million copies by mail, and actually recovered 2 million, 700,000 more, no one explained.
At the beginning, the senator who initiated the hearing said that even the Afghan elections are safer and safer than Pennsylvania. The United States often sends observers to monitor elections around the world. If domestic elections in the United States fail to meet the standards of the United States for monitoring foreign elections, how can we promote American values in the world?
Many senators and witnesses have said that it has nothing to do with who was elected, but the integrity and credibility of the election is the cornerstone of American democracy.
The last senator talked about the need to add barcodes to mailed ballots so that scanning can confirm the uniqueness of the ballots. The result was immediately rejected by the governor who insisted on mailing ballots and the Dominion system to count votes. Apart from fraud, there is no reason to do so. In fact, what witnesses witnessed and personally experienced this time is incredible, and only deliberate and organized fraud can explain it.
News (6)
Legal progress for Republicans in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada and Arizona
After the secretary of state certified the election results, a Pennsylvania court heard Friday, and a judge ruled that further certification should be suspended before the Friday hearing.
Michigan was forced to pass the certification, and the Michigan High Law immediately recommended an independent audit, because the general election has sufficient evidence of disturbing and serious allegations of election fraud and anomalies.
Big news from Nevada: A judge allowed Nevada Republicans to submit findings of widespread voter fraud at a court hearing on December 3. Now Americans will hear the testimony of eyewitnesses-this is a crucial step in increasing transparency and correcting illegal votes.
Arizona Republican Party Chairman Kelli Ward initiated a lawsuit requesting the audit of Maricopa County's mailed ballots, especially those duplicate ballots and due to the unusually large number of these ballots, requiring the court to issue subpoenas.
__________________
News (7)
Gingrich: Democrats are destroying fraudulent evidence, courts need to act quickly
Reporter : Yuning / Editor : Zhang Lili / https://www.soundofhope.org/post/446869 / Direct translation / Image {: Newt Gingrich (John Amis/AP)
Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich, published a commentary on the "English Epoch Times" website on November 25 (Wednesday) , To expose the trick of the Pennsylvania Democrats to hijack the 2020 election. He also used evidence to show that the Democratic Party was destroying fraudulent evidence in order to cover up the crime. Therefore, he urged the Penn State Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which has accepted the case, to take immediate action to prevent Democrats from destroying evidence in order to protect voters’ confidence in the election.
The article writes that the Democratic Party’s election fraud in 2020 involves a wide range of illegal activities involving private and public officials. The new complaint filed by the Trump legal camp in Pennsylvania on November 21 lists various illegal actions by the Pennsylvania Democrats to illegally increase Biden’s votes, such as allowing voters to "modify" non-compliant votes and allowing support for the Democratic Party. Groups register voters on a large scale from outside the system, and so on.
For example, Gingrich cited an unprecedented number of mailed ballots and absentee ballots in the U.S. election this year. "People will certainly estimate that there will be a large number of vote rejections due to voter filling errors, and Pennsylvania may have tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of rejected mailed votes. However, Pennsylvania rejected mailed votes. The number is only 0.03%. Some counties controlled by the Democratic Party have only 1,000 ballots rejected because they failed to fill in or the voter did not return a special ballot envelope with confidential voter information."
He explained that this was caused by the state's Secretary of State and Democrat Kathy Boockvar, who issued election guidelines without legal authorization and allowed the state's election officials to give voters the opportunity to modify their votes. He said that in counties controlled by the Democratic Party, such as Allegheny County, Philadelphia County, and Delaware County in the Pittsburgh area, a large number of voters have appeared. In the phenomenon of ballot modification, some election officials even contact voters according to the list and ask them to modify or supplement ballot information. "This has led to a large number of non-compliant votes in the state that should not be counted. Most of the voters in these Democratic-controlled counties support Biden. This has greatly increased Biden's support. At the same time, because of this The state controlled by the Republican Party is strictly enforcing the laws of the state, prohibiting the counting of non-compliant votes. As a result, many of the votes of President Trump in these counties are not counted, which invisibly separates the two candidates with vote gap."
Gingrich also said that this is not the only way for the Democratic Party to help Biden gain an advantage in the 2020 election. A large-scale investigation conducted by lawyers and investigators of the American non-party organization Thomas Moore Association last year also revealed another Democratic conspiracy to help Biden increase support, which is to allow organizations that support the Democratic Party to help voters register their qualifications. Enter the State's Unified Electoral Registry (SURE). After Secretary of State Boockvar exceeded his authority to allow radical pro-Democratic organizations, including Rock the Vote, to enter the state's unified electoral registry and help voters register their qualifications, Pennsylvania's voter list appeared similar to " Suspicious names like "Mary April Smith", "Mary May Smith", "Mary June Smith", and "Mary July Smith".
"What's even stranger is that these suspicious names have now mysteriously disappeared from the voter list." Gingrich believes that this shows that someone is systematically modifying the Pennsylvania voter list to cover up their fraud. Therefore, the Penn State Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit needs to immediately stop this modification of Penn State's unified election registration records and thoroughly investigate Penn State's fraud cases before more evidence is destroyed.
Gingrich wrote, “Those who try to hijack the 2020 election will definitely leave evidence and traces of the crime. Now they are trying to clear the evidence before the evidence is exposed to the American people. We cannot allow this to happen, Otherwise we may no longer be able to believe the integrity of our election."
No comments:
Post a Comment