Host : Shi Shan / Editor : Li Hong / https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/11/11/a102984287.html / Translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan, KUCINTA SETIA
News (1)
Pfizer's SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is part of Trump's anti-covid action
On 10 November 2020, the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer announced that early test data showed that the SARS-CoV-2 (CCP virus, novel coronavirus) vaccine developed by the company and the German biotechnology company BioNTech (BNT) is 90% effective. President Trump and Vice President Pence respectively tweeted to announce the good news.
Trump is very happy because he has been saying during the campaign that the U.S. federal government launched an "Operation Warp Speed" in April to accelerate the development of vaccines and other drugs. He believes that Pfizer’s results are related to this government action.
Immediately, the New York Times reported that it denied it. Their report quoted Pfizer’s head of vaccine research and development, Kathrin Jansen, who said that he has never taken money from the US government or anyone, and claimed that Pfizer has never participated in the “curvature speed operation”.
This is a lie.
The National Public Radio (NPR) reported in July that the Trump administration reached a nearly $2 billion agreement to help distribute vaccines. Pfizer announced in its July press release that the U.S. government had ordered the first 100 million doses of vaccines for $1.95 billion. Although no government funds were specifically invested in vaccine research and development, Pfizer definitely took the government money. Therefore, Pfizer subsequently remedied what Johnson said.
Those left-wing media hurriedly quoted a Pfizer spokesperson to clarify that the vaccine is related to Operation Curvature Speed, and that vaccine research and development did not receive funds from the federal government.
The problem is that what others said was related to "curvature speed action", but they went to clarify that they did not take the money.
The small American right-wing media The Federalist said that it took 10 seconds to search on Google to find that Pfizer was part of "Operation Curvature Speed"; the Wikipedia page also showed that Pfizer was part of the operation but why could The New York Times, which has thousands of employees, not find this information?
Of course, the crux of the problem is not here, but so many news media believe that the point of Pfizer's big news is not that the world is getting close to an effective vaccine, but that Trump must not get any credit for it. Therefore, the article said that these media, including the New York Times, are "absolutely shameful."
In fact, this is a typical approach of the so-called mainstream media in the United States. They lied, at least, they did not do anything similar to due diligence, as long as the content of their report could harm Trump. This is certainly not responsible news reporting.
The Federalist said millions of people will continue to believe this lie that can be corrected in less than two hours.
Regarding this news, Trump has always believed that the United States can get an effective vaccine in November, but he was bombarded by various media, believing that he was exaggerating. Many people came out and accused him of lying. All the leftist parties, all the so-called mainstream media, do not want the United States to have an effective drug, or a vaccine, to treat and prevent the CCP virus before the election, because everyone remembers that the bad epidemic prevention and control topic in the election is their greatest weapon.
News (2)
Fake news media on the presidential election
A matter related to the safety of all people's lives and the stability of the country has been manipulated by these media in this way. You can imagine what happens to reports on the presidential election itself?
In fact, the earliest manipulation started long before the general election. The so-called polls of the major media are one-sidedly biased. Democrat Biden's leading figures vary from 8% to 15%. These media said that there will be a blue wave in the United States. Not only will Biden be elected in a large proportion, but the Democratic Party will win the national congressional elections but this blue wave did not appear.
In addition to the election of the presidential election, the Democratic Party has only won one more seat so far, while the Democratic Party has lost 4 seats for the House of Representatives, while the Republican Party has won 4 more seats.
Let's take a look at an example of the second district in New Jersey.
New Jersey is a typical Democratic blue state. In the second constituency, the former member of Congress was Jeff Van Drew. He was originally a member of the Democratic Party. However, in 2019, because he opposed the Democratic Party’s impeachment and recall of Trump, he transferred to the party and became the Republican Party member.
Of course the Democratic Party hates him to death. In order to get him down, the Democrats deployed and mobilized in this district and launched a member of the Kennedy family, Amy Kennedy, wife of former Congressman Patrick Kennedy, to confront him.
In all past opinion polls, it was determined that Van Drew would definitely lose, lagging behind Amy Kennedy, by as much as 15%. Until the last poll a week before the election, various mainstream leftist media said he was behind. 7% to 8%.
Of course, it turned out that Van der Rohe won, winning nearly 7%. Let’s talk about it, from falling behind by 8% to winning by 7%, this is 15%. For a so-called poll, this is a farce at all, it has no reference at all, and it is ridiculously wrong.
The reason why we take these two examples out is because before the current US election is still without results, how should we understand the current situation, including the large number of election frauds, how should we understand it? Very very important. I know that most people, especially most Hong Kong people, will get to know them through the so-called mainstream media, and then the mainstream media in Hong Kong and Taiwan are met through the so-called mainstream media in the United States. But we know that these American media have no objective stand on the issue of the general election. They have completely lost the principle of balanced reporting. They have made mistakes many times, even ridiculously wrong. Should we trust them?
Regarding election fraud, many people will follow these media to say that there is no evidence or minor mistakes, and every activity will have some. It means don't hold it accountable, that's it. Some people say, don’t fail to lose.
These are the main statements of the mainstream media in the United States.
News (4)
Election fraud in Michigan and Pennsylvania
Let's talk about fraud. At least, a few of the things that everyone broke out now have been confirmed. First, in Michigan, a sudden increase of 130,000 votes was given to Biden. Later, several mainstream media in the United States said that this was just a mistake and it had been corrected. However, the results of their investigations were different. Some said it was a typographical error by the election agency, the decimal point was wrong, and some said that the county election agency clerk was wrong. No matter what, this error still exists. In a county, there are 130,000 votes.
Also in Michigan, the 6000 votes originally cast for Trump were recorded for Biden. This was also confirmed, and the investigation found that it was also a "small mistake."
There are many "small mistakes". Yes, we often make small mistakes, but if these small mistakes are all of the same kind, it is very suspicious.
In another key state, Pennsylvania, the situation is more serious.
A data expert named Mei Ting wrote a data analysis article for the Epoch Times. Let me introduce to everyone.
Now, the Penn State government’s big data was last updated on November 6. All voters’ birthdays, party affiliations, date of application, date of mailing, and date of withdrawal of ballots can be found, but cannot be found. Name, address, phone number and other information. There are a total of 3,098,705 people with non-sensitive information. These can be checked.
According to data from the Pennsylvania government, it can be seen that 52 people born between 1800 and 1907 applied for mailed ballots, and 34 of them successfully returned ballots, including those born in 1800.
According to public information, the oldest person in Pennsylvania is 113-year-old Ms. Ardith Grose, born in 1907. A person born in 1800, who helped him or her register and voted?
Because it does not contain information such as names and addresses, it is impossible to track who it is, but the department in charge of voting in the state government should have these specific information. The main person in charge of the department is responsible for these illegal votes, which are counted as official votes. Form a judicial interpretation.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. The state government can check other age groups, including people who have died but voted, track all illegal mailed votes, and bring to justice those involved in making false votes in the process of premeditating and participating in mailed voting.
News (5)
The problems of mail voting in Pennsylvania
The biggest problem for the US Election is mail voting.
The United States Postal Service (USPS) regular mail mailing speed is about 1 to 3 working days. The election committee sends out the ballots, and the voters send them back after they are received. It usually takes a few days to return.
It is "almost unbelievable" that the ballot papers are received the next day or the same day after they have been sent. According to the work process of the post office, even in areas within the same county that are close to each other, it takes 1 to 2 days for ordinary mail to be delivered.
The ballots have been collected before being sent, and the ballots have been collected before being sent.
According to the public information of the Pennsylvania government, 51,200 people received ballots the day after they were sent, accounting for 1.652%; 34,916 people received ballots on the day they were sent, accounting for 1.127%; some votes were received before they were sent. 23,305 people, or 0.752%, and 9005 people, or 0.291%, had votes received before they were sent. The total here is 118,426 mailed ballots. These votes have the possibility of fraud.
The following is the website of the Penn State government that provides big data. Readers are encouraged to download it and leave evidence to avoid data tampering:
For comparison, in another state, a county with 210,000 voters, the situation is similar. According to similar analysis, the percentage of ballots received one day after mailing in this area is 0.054%, which is 30 times the difference from 1.652% in Pennsylvania; the ballots are sent on the day of mailing. The percentage of received votes is 0.078%; the number of votes received before it is sent is 0.
News (6)
Vote fraudsters must be punished by law, mainstream media must expose election fraud
The U.S. High Court requires the Pennsylvania government to count the votes before and after 8 p.m. on November 3 separately to facilitate judicial screening. However, the 118,426 votes recorded above alone are enough to make people suspect that fraud existed before November 3. Now the Senate Judiciary Committee requires a thorough investigation of all election fraud, hoping to deliver a fair result soon to the public.
Two states, two key swing states, have hundreds of thousands of vote problems, and when they are both beneficial to one party, it is inevitable that the beneficiaries will be suspected. Now the Republican Party’s complaint mailbox and mobile phone messages have received more than 200,000 complaints and reports, and thousands of people are willing to come forward to testify. The U.S. Federal Election Commission has announced that if a thorough investigation is not done, the Pennsylvania vote will be considered illegal.
In school examinations, if someone is caught cheating and is deprived of exam qualifications, the candidate's score is zero. I think that the general election is much more serious than the student examination. If someone cheats, will there be any punishment for the cheater? "They were all careless, and the decimal point was mistyped. It doesn't matter, it depends on the overall situation." This kind of argument is the CCP. Isn't it? The left pursues fairness, but fairness is impossible without justice, and without transparency rules, it must be the moon in the water.
Stalin once said that voting is not the key, nor is it who you vote for. The key is who counts the votes. As long as the counting of votes and public opinion are controlled, the entire system can be completely controlled.
Now, all the news about large-scale fraud and large-scale complaints is not reported, not followed up, or downplayed by the mainstream American media on the left. I believe that now is an important moment in history that not only determines the future politics of the United States, but also the future media ecology of the United States and the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment