Reporter : Yue Wenxiao
Editor : Yuan Mingqing
Publisher : Sound Of Hope
Extract translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan
/ KUCINTA SETIA
Image courtesy : UIP
A CDC expert in China, Wu Zunyou, emphasized that the Beijing's new epidemic rebounded from the end of May. Compared with the outbreak in Wuhan at that time, it was discovered and controlled as early as possible, but there was no concealment, but Gao Fu, Director of the China CDC, begged to differ. He revealed that the epidemic in Beijing may not start at the end of May or only appeared in early June. The time may be pushed forward one month. This statement echoes the analysis on whether the two sessions of the Chinese Communist Party were convened.
According to mainland media reports, the Beijing epidemic resurrected. As of the official data as of the morning of the 17 June, a total of 137 cases were diagnosed in just 6 days. This official data is still being questioned involving concealment. The official also admitted that the epidemic was severe.
On 16 June, Gao Fu, Director of the CCP's China CDC, said at a survey meeting on major epidemic prevention and control mechanisms held in Shanghai by the CPPCC National Committee that the virus will "live" in dark and humid environments, and then suddenly be exposed to many people. He believes that " This time, Beijing is probably not a patient who appeared in early June or late May, and it is likely to be pushed for a month in advance. That is, around the beginning of May, the epidemic spread quietly.
Gao Fu pointed out that there are already a lot of asymptomatic infections or light patients in the environment, so that there can be so many viruses in the environment, but he also emphasized that it is only speculation and needs further verification.
Wu Zunyou, the chief expert in epidemiology of the Chinese Communist Party’s Center for Disease Control, previously said that patients “should be infected at the earliest by the end of May at the earliest.” He also believed that Beijing’s epidemic should have been detected in a timely manner, and the authorities began large-scale The blockade and investigation should be able to be effectively controlled to avoid the out-of-control state at the outbreak of Wuhan.
Gao Fu's statement is obviously inconsistent with Wu Zunyou
Analysts believe that Gao Fu has openly questioned that the epidemic in Beijing has quietly spread as early as a month ago. It is obviously that the epidemic prevention and control work in the capital Beijing is not in place. Cai Qi, the secretary of the Beijing Municipal Party Committee, is a close believer of Xi Jinping. Beijing has entered an "unusual period".
Regarding the outbreak of this epidemic in Beijing, some netizens have questioned that it was the introduction of representatives of the two associations in late last month.
Some Twitter users pointed out that the epidemic was discovered before the end of May, but in order to prevent Xi Beiguo (because he insisted on having two sessions), he had been hiding for more than 10 days, and now he can’t suppress it, otherwise Beijing will Will become the second Wuhan, so local data was released.
Time commentator Zheng Zhongyuan wrote, "The two sessions" represent thousands of miles of poisoning? Plague fear enveloped Zhongnanhai pointed out that since the outbreak of Wuhan, official experts have admitted that there are a large number of asymptomatic infected people in China. Does the two associations nationwide still carry viruses? The delegates and committee members went to Beijing for a meeting as scheduled under the strict inspection of Bai Mi, and quietly brought the virus to the participants in Beijing? Of course we cannot deny and confirm. Official experts will not go back in this way. They regard political stability as more than everything, because once they check it, they question the decision of the Chinese Communist Party to hold two sessions at that time.
The article believes that the two sessions of the Chinese Communist Party, which ended on 28 May, now appear that not only thousands of delegates need to take the risk of contracting the epidemic to come to Beijing for meetings, but also all the top leaders of the Chinese Communist Party are meeting at the risk.
The convening of the two sessions this year is considered an opportunity for the CCP authorities to divert their attention. At that time, because of the concealment of the epidemic, it was internationally held accountable for claims, and from time to time, protests under the banner of anti- Xi were released through the Internet, and the Chinese Communist authorities were under great pressure, so the labor and people hurt the money. As a result, the meeting turned out to be anxious to forcefully suppress Hong Kong's human rights and directly destroy the "one country, two systems" Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, which caused uproar.
No comments:
Post a Comment