Reporter : Zhong Jingming
Editor : Ming Xuan
Publisher : New Tang Dynasty Television
Ref : https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/05/08/a102842091.html
Translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan
/ KUCINTA SETIA
Image : Pasteur Institute website and researcher Etienne Simon-Lorière. (Webpage Screenshot)
Recently, the CCP media have thrown the black pot of virus origin to France, and even quoted French research reports as endorsements. But the expert subject of the report later came forward and accused the CCP media of distorting the original intention of the report, and pointed out that the virus originated in Wuhan without doubt. Prior to this, the CCP dumped virus responsibilities to Italy and the United States. These acts which had staged similar farce and were refuted by the experts involved.
A few days ago, the People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China, claimed that according to a research report from the Pasteur Institute in France and the report by the French media Echo, “The French epidemic is caused by an unknown virus circulating in the local area. Caused by the strain. " This article from the party media was heavily hyped and used to dump the pot of virus origin to France.
To this end, Etienne Simon-Lorière, the head of the research report and a researcher at the Pasteur Institute, clarified at the French Broadcasting on 7 May 2020, pointing out that the report of the Chinese Communist Party media does not conform to the original intent of the Pasteur Institute report.
The research report titled "Trace Analysis of Imported and Early Viruses in France" was published in the pre-published form on the shared website of the BioRxiv archives network in the United States on April 23.
Simon Lorrier said that the report only said that the information currently available is not enough to determine how the virus arrived in France. That is to say, the path of the virus from Wuhan to France is still inconclusive, not the party media. The advertised "French outbreak was caused by a local virus strain".
According to Simon Lorriere, the purpose of this study was to find a way to spread the virus in France. By comparing the genome sequence of the virus, the research team concluded that the virus spread to France through multiple paths. The earliest spread to France directly through China and Italy, but after the French government adopted isolation measures, this spread came to a halt. Virus samples collected in France today can no longer see the traces of the earliest imported virus. In addition, 95% of the viruses spread in France belong to one of the three variant branches of the virus, and in most European countries, the three branches of the virus are spread at the same time, which is a major feature of the French epidemic.
Simon Lorrier emphasized that there is no doubt that the virus first came from the People's Republic of China. There are several possibilities for the route of the virus from PRC to France, or the virus comes directly from China, or arrives in France from China via Italy, or arrives in France from China through a third country without genetic sequencing, such as Lebanon.
Simon Lorrier also pointed out that the "Echo" reported a problem with the title of the report. I have verified the content of the "Echo" report, but the title of the report was later somehow changed to "The new French novel coronavirus may not come from China or Italy?" ". Pasteur College has already asked the "Echo" to amend the title and apologize.
Simon Lorrier finally pointed out that the Global Shared Influenza Initiative (GISAID) currently has a large amount of gene sequence data of SARS-Cov-2 strains around the world. Judging from the evolutionary tree of viral genes, the earliest gene sequences all come from Wuhan, which means that the ancestors of all these viruses are in Wuhan.
The CCP’s public opinion hype in this round of virus origin dumping to France began with a report in France. The report quoted local doctors as saying that a French patient admitted to the hospital on 27 December 2019 was later diagnosed as a CV virus infection. In this regard, a WHO spokesperson stated that “it is not unexpected” and pointed out that this does not mean that the virus came from somewhere other than Wuhan.
According to a paper published by Chinese experts, the first registered Wuhan covid patient was admitted to the hospital on 1 December 2019. The Hong Kong media "South China Morning Post" quoted internal documents of the CCP as saying that the earliest official record of the infected person appeared on 17 November 2019.
The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak first broke out in Wuhan, and early virus strains have all evolved from Wuhan virus strains. Therefore, the fact that the virus came from PRC has almost reached consensus in the academic community and the international community. However, in order to shirk its responsibility, the CCP is still continuously creating public opinion to deceive the Chinese and foreign countries.
Earlier, the CCP had taken the Italian expert's statement and the US paper out of context and tried to throw the virus source to these two countries. However, experts quoted by the CCP clarified afterwards, emphasizing that the virus came from PRC.
Editor : Ming Xuan
Publisher : New Tang Dynasty Television
Ref : https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/05/08/a102842091.html
Translation, editing : Gan Yung Chyan
/ KUCINTA SETIA
Image : Pasteur Institute website and researcher Etienne Simon-Lorière. (Webpage Screenshot)
Recently, the CCP media have thrown the black pot of virus origin to France, and even quoted French research reports as endorsements. But the expert subject of the report later came forward and accused the CCP media of distorting the original intention of the report, and pointed out that the virus originated in Wuhan without doubt. Prior to this, the CCP dumped virus responsibilities to Italy and the United States. These acts which had staged similar farce and were refuted by the experts involved.
A few days ago, the People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China, claimed that according to a research report from the Pasteur Institute in France and the report by the French media Echo, “The French epidemic is caused by an unknown virus circulating in the local area. Caused by the strain. " This article from the party media was heavily hyped and used to dump the pot of virus origin to France.
To this end, Etienne Simon-Lorière, the head of the research report and a researcher at the Pasteur Institute, clarified at the French Broadcasting on 7 May 2020, pointing out that the report of the Chinese Communist Party media does not conform to the original intent of the Pasteur Institute report.
The research report titled "Trace Analysis of Imported and Early Viruses in France" was published in the pre-published form on the shared website of the BioRxiv archives network in the United States on April 23.
Simon Lorrier said that the report only said that the information currently available is not enough to determine how the virus arrived in France. That is to say, the path of the virus from Wuhan to France is still inconclusive, not the party media. The advertised "French outbreak was caused by a local virus strain".
According to Simon Lorriere, the purpose of this study was to find a way to spread the virus in France. By comparing the genome sequence of the virus, the research team concluded that the virus spread to France through multiple paths. The earliest spread to France directly through China and Italy, but after the French government adopted isolation measures, this spread came to a halt. Virus samples collected in France today can no longer see the traces of the earliest imported virus. In addition, 95% of the viruses spread in France belong to one of the three variant branches of the virus, and in most European countries, the three branches of the virus are spread at the same time, which is a major feature of the French epidemic.
Simon Lorrier emphasized that there is no doubt that the virus first came from the People's Republic of China. There are several possibilities for the route of the virus from PRC to France, or the virus comes directly from China, or arrives in France from China via Italy, or arrives in France from China through a third country without genetic sequencing, such as Lebanon.
Simon Lorrier also pointed out that the "Echo" reported a problem with the title of the report. I have verified the content of the "Echo" report, but the title of the report was later somehow changed to "The new French novel coronavirus may not come from China or Italy?" ". Pasteur College has already asked the "Echo" to amend the title and apologize.
Simon Lorrier finally pointed out that the Global Shared Influenza Initiative (GISAID) currently has a large amount of gene sequence data of SARS-Cov-2 strains around the world. Judging from the evolutionary tree of viral genes, the earliest gene sequences all come from Wuhan, which means that the ancestors of all these viruses are in Wuhan.
The CCP’s public opinion hype in this round of virus origin dumping to France began with a report in France. The report quoted local doctors as saying that a French patient admitted to the hospital on 27 December 2019 was later diagnosed as a CV virus infection. In this regard, a WHO spokesperson stated that “it is not unexpected” and pointed out that this does not mean that the virus came from somewhere other than Wuhan.
According to a paper published by Chinese experts, the first registered Wuhan covid patient was admitted to the hospital on 1 December 2019. The Hong Kong media "South China Morning Post" quoted internal documents of the CCP as saying that the earliest official record of the infected person appeared on 17 November 2019.
The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak first broke out in Wuhan, and early virus strains have all evolved from Wuhan virus strains. Therefore, the fact that the virus came from PRC has almost reached consensus in the academic community and the international community. However, in order to shirk its responsibility, the CCP is still continuously creating public opinion to deceive the Chinese and foreign countries.
Earlier, the CCP had taken the Italian expert's statement and the US paper out of context and tried to throw the virus source to these two countries. However, experts quoted by the CCP clarified afterwards, emphasizing that the virus came from PRC.
No comments:
Post a Comment